Galileo was a crypto-Muslim

Galileo, the Father of Eurabia

At the Source of the Conflict: Counterreformation vs. Reformation

Indian religious philosophy regards the universe as resulting from a non purposive manifestation of, or emanation from, an absolute unity (substance; cp. homoousios) that is not personal in any strict sense. In the Assyrian inscriptions we find recorded the Chaldeo-Babylonian idea of an evolution of the universe out of the primeval flood or “great deep,” and of the animal evolution out of the earth and sea. The general idea of evolution in Nature, transmitted from the Chaldeans through the Phoenicians, took strong hold upon Greek thought and was developed in many perverse ways; Aristotle sometimes developed it in a manner which reminds us of modern views.

Hand in hand with evolutionism goes the idea that the Universe is built of four basic elements. In ancient Greece, at the very dawn of philosophy itself, a group who are now called atomists (particularly Leucippus, Democritus, and the Roman author Lucretius) postulated that all matter was formed of “atoms”, which were small, hard and indestructible. They taught that the atoms moved in a void, and that it was in eternal fallings and collisions of them that creates everything in the world (similarly in modern Science these fallings and collisions were initiated by “Big Bang”). By postulating the void that all atoms “fell” with relation to, they were perhaps the first explicit absolutists in history. They inspired Newton's absolute Space. He speculated, If ever space had not existed, God at that time would have been nowhere.

Muhammad, for political reasons, rejected the idea of the Biblical Eden planted by God on earth and embraced instead the idea of the garden of material (atomic) Immortality that the Babylonian myth placed in Heaven. Unlike the Biblical Adam who was simply “sent forth from the garden of Eden” (Gen. 3:23), the Koran’s Adam was “sent down from the garden” (Sura Ta-Ha 20:123). Similarly, in the so-called Gospel of Marcion Jesus was send down, maybe from a “hanging, heavenly garden”, like a certain Clark Kent who can live in Smallville, like huris can live up there. One of French dioceses worships Jesus as an alien.

In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar,
Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea,
Jesus descended (out of heaven) into Capernaum, a city in Galilee,
and was teaching (in the synagogue) on the Sabbath days,
And they were astonished at his doctrine (3:1/4:31)

Their “astonishment” is explained by the Syrian translation of the New Testament which in the Gospel of Luke puts into the mouth of the youthful Jesus a heliocentric lecture according to the Syrian astrologer Seleucus. Well, it was a high ranking Catholic hierarch of Vienna J. A. Widmanstadt working on his project of the Syriac Bible who presented Copernicus's research in the Vatican Garden to the Pope Clement VII (Copernicanum de motu terrae sententiam explicavi), for which was was rewarded a precious Greek manuscript which is still preserved in the Munich Public Library.

Is the Moon a Sign or a Body?

One cannot help but wonder, is the moon a heavenly body (like material girls, or huris) in the Copernican sense, or is it a light serving as a sign: “And God said,. 'Let there be lights in the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years.” (Gen 1:14)
We learn from the Mishna Treatise Rosh Hashana 2:8 that “Rabban Gamliel had a chart of moon shapes on a wall, and he would show this to the people, and ask: Was it like this one? Like that one?” And that's exactly what the word 'sign' means.
Defending the central idea of the Koran, the 12th century Muslim commentator Ibn Rushd (Averroes) misattributed to Aristotle the statement that “since the moon in itself is dark, and is bright on account of another body, it is therefore similar to the earth in nature.” In fact, Aristotle did not regard the moon as akin to the earth, or similar to it in nature. His moon is a heavenly body that moves, whereas his earth is a non-heavenly body that does not move. His moon has something in common, not with the earth, but with the sun” and becomes as it were a second and lesser sun.” (Generation of Animals, IV. 10:777b 24-26) (Cp. “And God made the two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night; and the stars. - Gen 1:16)


Heliocentrists' Attack on the Biblical Moon

Averroes was regarded as a reliable authority on Aristotle by Copernicus, Maestlin and Kepler. They accepted Averroes's assertion that in a work on animals Aristotle declared the earth and moon identical in nature, even though they could not have found any such statement in any of Aristotle's works. And could easily have found its opposite.

This conclusion that the moon is the body akin to the earth. is supported by many arguments adduced by one of the interlocutors in Plutarch's book On the Face in the Moon. Plutarch as a priest of Apollo defended philosophical heliocentrism of Aristarch of Samos and rejected geocentrism defended by Archimedes. Aristotle was drawn in this camp by his Arab interpreters. For Kepler the ebb and the flow of the tides was the clearest proof of this kinship and of...the existence of the daemons. “If the earth ceased to attract its own waters to itself, all the water in its seas would be lifted up and would flow into the body of the moon. The sphere of the attractive power which is in the moon extends as far as the earth”; that this is the explanation of the ebb and flow of the tide” was emphasized by Kepler's sidenote. (GW III, 26:1-3) There was no zero-gravity area for Kepler.

In his Harmonics, Book IV, last chapter, he discussed an additional reason for the ebb and flow of the tide: “ For if the daemons (or, jins) live nowhere else except in the cone of shadow, but are conceived as hurrying the body upward toward the apex of the cone, unless the moon is present at the same time in its passage through the cone, surely they will be alone, without any help from anything, toiling, sweating, and, naturally, exhausted. But if they undertake their work when the moon is favorable, its presence in the shadow will aid their efforts with the magnetic pull of a kindred body.” Keep in mind that Jesus used to cast out the daemons by the thousands.

Anticipating Galileo's Heliocentric “Science”

The introduction of the Spanish printed version of a Renaissance forgery, the Gospel of Barnabas book tells us how a friar named Fra Marino, the father inquisitor of Venice from 1542 to 1550, had found the Gospel in the library of Pope Sixtus V, at a moment when the Holy Father had taken a little nap. The friar is said to have been so impressed by the reading that he converted to Islam.

The teaching of The Gospel of Barnabas appears with full evidence in the passage where Jesus tells his disciples about the Creation and the Fall. When Adam is created, he sees a writing in the air with the Islamic confession: “There is only one God, and Mohammed is the messenger of God” (Chapter 39) Jesus tells James (Chapter 43) that the Messiah descends not from Isaac, as the Jews believe, but from Ishmael, from whom the only true Messiah – Mohammed – will descend. Accordingly, it is not Isaac but Ishmael whom Abraham was ordered to sacrifice (Wouldn’t that explain the willingness of Palestinian parents to sacrifice their children as living bomb?). Finally, Jesus declares that he has seen Mohammed in a vision and cries out: “O Mohammed, God be with thee, and may he make me worthy to untie thy shoelaces, for obtaining this I shall be a great prophet and holy one of God” (Chapter 44) We can safely assume that the Jesus of the Gospel of Barnabas was an alien like that of Syrian gnostic Marcion.

In 1547, or three years after Copernicus's book was published the first Italian translation of the Koran was published by an Italian printer named Arrivabene. This Italian edition of the Koran was to counter the German edition of the Bible by Gutenberg. The Koranic heliocentric cosmogony stood against the Biblical geocentrism. Now let me explain, how the Koranic cosmogony inspired Galileo's proof of the moving earth.

In 1597 the Pisan scientist wrote a letter to Kepler, saying that he had found in the Copernican doctrine a way to explain many natural phenomena, perhaps (as Kepler supposed, referring to Galileo's letter) even a puzzling one, like that of the tides. What, exactly, the Galilean solution to the problem of the tides was, became clear only in 1616, when Galileo was in Rome, trying to convince the Church not to ban the Copernican theory. After this attempt failed, with the consequence that the Copernican position could no longer be held or defended, Galileo wrote his "Discorso sul flusso e il reflusso del mare", in the form of a private letter to Cardinal Orsini.

It was in 1595 when Galileo first came up with his explanation for the tides. The idea occurred to him while traveling on a barge that was ferrying freshwater to Venice. (Galileo lived in nearby Padua and often visited Venice.) He noticed that whenever the barge's speed or direction altered, the freshwater inside sloshed around accordingly. If the vessel suddenly ground to a halt on a sandbar, for instance, the water pushed up towards the bow then bounced back toward the stern, doing this several times with ever decreasing agitation until it returned to a level state.

Galileo realized that the Earth's dual motion—its daily one around its axis and its annual one around the sun—might have the same effect on oceans and other great bodies of water as the barge had on its freshwater cargo. The key, as Galileo saw it, was that even though we don't sense it, different parts of our planet move at different speeds depending on the time of day. It's as if the Earth were a barge, which sped up, slowed down, and periodically changed direction.

Galileo also thought his tidal theory provided powerful support for the notion that the Earth revolved around the sun (and not the other way around, as virtually everyone in the world then believed). For years, Galileo kept his thoughts on the matter close to his chest, but eventually he could contain himself no longer. He fervently believed Copernicus was right, and he would tell the world. In 1632, Galileo published his Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. During the six years he had labored on it, Galileo's working title for the book had been On the Flux and Reflux of the Sea, and indeed, he reprised his 1616 argument in the last of the book's four sections.

According to Einstein, it was Galileo's longing to find a mechanical proof of the Earth's motion, that misled him into not only formulating but clinging so tenaciously to his flawed theory on the tides. The planet's motion accounts for the tides, Galileo posited, and the tides account for the planet's motion. Galileo turned the earth into a perpetual motion machine. Contrary to his wish, expressed at the end of his Tratise on the Tides of 1616 “that his idea does not turn out to be delusive, like a dream which gives a brief image of truth followed by an immediate certainty of falsity” a lengthy summary of our understanding of the tides that the British physicist Lord Kelvin published in 1882 mentions Galileo only in passing. A look back at Galileo's big mistake offers clues to how and why such a great thinker could have made it, and what lessons it can offer us today.

In fact, it was the God of the Koran who failed Galileo, because the ridiculous comparison of the earth to a barge which inspired the idea of our earth as “a Little ship” of the ill-famous Rome's Report was inspired by the Koranic verse: Adlai Stevenson said in his last speech:
“We travel together, passengers on a
little space ship....”

"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon, all (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its orbit with its own motion. (21:33)"

Abdullah Yusuf Ali commented on this verse: “...the metaphor of swimming implied in the original words how beautiful is to contemplate the heavenly bodies swimming through space (or ether) in their rounded courses before our gaze.

In the Book of Hermes, "Pimander" The celestial ocean, the ÆTHER, which flows from east to west, is the Breath of the Father, the life-giving Principle, the HOLY GHOST!" "For they are not at all separated and their union is LIFE." Gnosticism going by name of Hermetism in the Renaissance and Reformation, practiced magic and meditation to try to free the spirit from the body.

According to Aristotle, the celestial bodies are not made of the same four elements as the earthly bodies. They are made of a “fifth element” or “aether”. Cleopatra waiting to meet eternity declares, that she is “fire and air”, my other elements I have to baser life. (Ascent, 11)

Heliocentrism is a Mystery Religion

The Hermetic idea of the celestial ether influenced also Newton's thinking about gravity: “Is not this medium much rarer within the dense bodies of the sun, stars and planets and comets than in the empty celestial sphere between them? And in passing from them to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser perpetually and thereby cause the gravity of those great bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the bodies; every body endeavoring to go from the denser parts of the medium towards the rarer? As the Gnostics taught?” When we try to find a closer analogy to the Stoic idea of the working of the pneuma, it will be worth while to contrast this principle of differentiation by density gradients with Newton's earlier speculations on the aether. In his letter to Oldenburg before, he says: “But it is not to be supposed that this medium is one uniform matter, but composed partly of the main phlegmatic body of aether, partly of other various aethereal spirits, much after the manner that air is composed of the phlegmatic body of air intermixed with various vapours and exhalations. For the electric and magnetic effluvia, and the gravitating principle seem to argue such variety. The principle of differentiation by mixture propounded here is very similar to that of the Stoics which we would trace back to that of Diogenes of Apollonia. Pneuma, it is true, had gradually become the “fifth element”, identified with aether, and was probably in the course of time detached from its origins and regarded as a simple substance.” Some of Newton's early ideas derive the aether from the principles of continuity and mixture in a picture surprisingly close to the basic Stoic assumptions: “Perhaps the whole frame of nature may be nothing but various contextures of some certain aetherial spirits and vapours, condensed as it were by precipitation...and after condensation wrought into various forms...Thus perhaps may all things be originated from aether.” (S. Sambursky's book The Physics of the Stoics. New York 1959)

Annie Besant,in her address given in London on September 4th, 1891, to the United Democratic Club elaborated on this science: “As you lowered the temperature the apparently empty receiver would soon be filled with a delicate mist; as you continued to lower the temperature, that mist would gradually assume the form of definite vapour, then of definite liquid, and further on of solid (the Stoic pneuma of physis is more humid and colder, while that of psyche is drier and hotter.)” To say that pneuma under certain circumstances is “wetter and colder” and sometimes “drier and hotter,” comes very near to the Newtonian conception of a simple substance “intermixed with various vapours and exhalations.

Well, Sir William Crookes, Physicist, chemist and a President of Royal Society, claimed to have seen materialized, by scientific precipitation spirit forms, or spiritual bodies walking and talking during séances, and Charles Darwin opined that Sir. Crrokes was thoroughly scientific in his procedures. Sir Crookes himself materialized a spirit whom he named Katie King weighing 42 pounds and in New York former minister to Portugal Mr. J. O'Sullivan had a photograph of a materialized spirit of a former pirate John King condemned for his atrocities. On Mr. O'Sullivan's picture John King was at full length floating (levitating) in space, holding up a peculiar globe of light shaped like a glass decanter.
felixcircle.blogspot.com/2008/06/brazilian-ec... felixcircle.blogspot.com/2008_10_23_archive.html

In other words, the Koran placed the biblical geocentrism in the cosmogony of the mystery religions. The same idea inspired the phallic architecture of the Al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. This trend was initiated by Muhammad himself. Disappointed when the Jews did not acknowledge his leadership, Muhammed turned against them and invoked Hanifism, the supposedly uncorrupted religion of Abraham, against them (According to one tradition, in this “uncorrupted religion” Abraham went through with the sacrifice of his son). He also ascribed to Abraham many of the elements of Arab paganism that he took over into Islam. From this time on, Muhammed no longer regarded Islam as a form of revelation ranking with Judaism and Christianity; he proclaimed it to be the one and only true religion.

And the phallic architecture of the Dome of the Rock which is modeled on the architecture of the innumerable Indian shrines of linga and yoni is the best symbol of the Hanifism or the de-judaized religion. Muhammad turned into an Aryan anti-Semite; he went back to the sacred prostitution of the ancient Babylonians and revived the idea of their Heavenly Brothel, in which the black-eyed huris abound.

A few years ago, Father George Coyne, head of the Vatican Observatory Research Group who actually run the pontificate of John Paul II suggested that we might view stars as God's sperm. Every sperm has the potential to produce life, he said, but most of them never realize that goal. Like sperm, “each star is fired with a propensity for life, but there is no reason to think any of them have achieved this.” Well, the so-called sperm gnostics joined sperm with the Holy Logos, like Justin the Martyr.

Back to the Bible

The Russian Professor of astronomy A.B. Arkhipov in his book Nyerazgadannye Tainy Vsyelennoy(The Unsolved Secrets of the Universe) published in Moscow (2004 ISBN 5-94538-446-1) among the lunar marvels mentions the following astronomical events described in ancient chronicles:

1048 The Armenian Chronicle of Etaum Patmich of the 13th century reads: “In that year, on May 14, in the early night during the New Moon a star was visible on the disc of the Moon. According to Armenian astronomers Barsegyan and Parsamyan an attempt to identify this star with the supernova of 1054 means stretching the truth.
1064 “in those days a star of unusual brightness appeared within the circle of the moon after a few days following her moving away from the sun. J. Malvesius Chronicon (Muratori L.A. Retum Italicarium scriptores. Lib. 14. Milan, 1729, p. 873)
1540 W.S. Cameron's Lunar transient phenomena catalog (NSSDC/WDC-A-R&S 78-03, Greenbelt: NASA, 1978, p. 109) describes a strange engraving depicting a star which appeared On November 26 on the black part of the New Moon

The same catalog mentions that on March 5, 1587 many people saw a star within the circle of the Moon “exactly between the edges of her horns.”

On page 136 of Prof. Arkhipov's book you'll find two copies: one representing a Byzantine coin depicting a star inside the horns of the New Moon (see the flag of Turkey and of other Muslim states) and a similar event as depicted by the pre-Columbian astronomers of Peru.

So try it for yourself and you'll see with your naked eyes. You'll see the blue sky through the “cutout” of the new moon, and sometimes the black part of it, which, obviously blocks the view of the blue sky, but not always, contrary to Galileo's claim. And then, you will be compelled to ask yourself the question, is Venus a body too if I can see blue sky through the cutout of its crescent. And then, maybe, you will admit that the earth created by G-d as our homeland is totally unique in the Universe. Exactly, like the Torah claims. Everything up there is to remind us of times, and seasons, and years and of other events important for our lives. And then you'll find easily the answer to the question why God created the heaven first: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. In the myth it is the goddess of earth Gea, presently worshiped by the highest ranking politicians as Gaia, who gives birth to both: gods and men. Exactly like Bishop of Lincoln R. Grosseteste taught.
Another surprising thing about the Dialogue is that Galileo not only misrepresents the Copernican system as a beautifully simple affair, but seems to have been himself unaware of its complexities. He had never taken much interest in the tiresome details of planetary theory, and there was no real reason for him to plod through the technical chapters in the Revolutions from cover to cover. If he had done so, he could not have believed that all planets move with the same linear velocity, nor attributed the idea to Copernicus that the moon either shines in her own light or is transparent to the light of the sun. (Lettera del Maestro Paolo Antonio Foscraini, Carmelitano, sopra l'opinione de i Pittagorici e del Copernico della mobilita della Terra e stabilita del Sole, il nuove Sisteme del Mondo, Napoli, 1615). But transparency of the Moon would explain, otherwise incomprehensible fact mentioned above, that we can see through the moon during certain phases. Let me make my point by reminding that Alah was a sun god worshiped in Syria and that the name of the country itself is derived from an Indian sun god Surya.

Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi on Al-Jazeera on April 10, 2006:

"There are Signs That Allah Will Grant Islam Victory in Europe;" Europe & the U.S. "Should Agree to Become Islamic... or Else Declare War on the Muslims:"

"The so-called Old Testament and New Testament are neither Old Testament nor New Testament - because both testaments were superseded, and they are forged. They were written by hand hundreds of years after Jesus."

"We must search for the Gospel of Barnabas*, of St. Barnabas, because this is the true gospel."


Geert Wilders Forming International Anti-Islam Alliance
Av 7, 5770, 18 July 10 05:25, by Gil Ronen

(Israelnationalnews.com) Dutch anti-Jihadi lawmaker Geert Wilders is forming an international alliance, hoping to ban Muslim immigration into Western countries.
Wilders told the Associated Press Thursday he will launch the movement late this year in five countries: the Unites States, Canada, Britain, France and Germany. The new movement will be called the Geert Wilders International Freedom Alliance.
Speaking at the Dutch parliament, Wilders explained: "The message, 'stop Islam, defend freedom,' is a message that's not only important for the Netherlands but for the whole free Western world.”
Besides outlawing immigration from Islamic countries to the West, Wilders' group will push a ban on Islamic Sharia law. Wilders hopes the grassroots movement will act as a lobby to influence lawmakers, or eventually run as a party itself.
Ayhan Tonca, a prominent spokesman for Dutch Muslims,  told AP he feared Wilders' message would be well-received in Europe. "So long as things are going badly with the economy, a lot of people always need a scapegoat," he said. "At the moment, that is the Muslims in Western Europe."
Wilders perceives a need for an anti-Muslim movement that is more militant against Islam than traditional conservative parties, yet is not a far-right wing like the British National Party. "The BNP is a party that, whatever you think of it, it's not my party - I think it's a racist party," Wilders said.
Wilders' Freedom Party came in third in national elections last month, with 24 seats in the 150-seat Parliament, up from nine. However, mainstream parties refuse to form a coalition with Wilders.
Wilders will stand trial in October on hate speech charges based upon his short Internet film "Fitna," which depicted the Quran as a fascist book that inspires terrorism. The film was censored in some outlets but Arutz Sheva has kept it online.
Speaking with Yishai Fleisher on Israel National News earlier this year, Wilders said: “I know the majority of Muslims are not terrorists, but are rather law-abiding citizens. Islam is the problem; in Islam, there is no room for anything else but Islam, and therefore at the end of the day, we will lose everything that we stand for. I’ve visited almost every Islamic country, and I know that wherever Islam is dominant, there is one common denominator, and that is a loss of freedom, especially for Jews, women, non-Muslims, etc. We have to stand up and say that whoever wants to replace our ideology and culture with Islam is not welcome to stay.”
www.IsraelNationalNews.com