The Hoax called Foucault's Pendulum

“Even if you are dispersed to the ends of the heavens, from there will YHWH your G-d gather you and from there will He take you up. And YHWH your G-d will bring you to the Land which your ancestors have inherited and you shall inherit it. And He will do well by you, and make you more numerous than your ancestors.” (Dt.30:4,5)
And the prophet Jeremiah said the same:
“The days are coming,” declares YHWH, “when men will no longer say, ‘as surely as the Lord lives who brought the Israelites up out of Egypt,’ but they will say, ‘as surely as YHWH lives who brought the Israelites up out of the land of the North and out of all the countries where he banished them.’ For I will restore them to the land that I gave to their forefathers…Then they will know that my name is YHWH.” Jer. 16:14-16, 21).
In order to delegitimize such prophecies the Roman imperialists, who wrote the Gospels, put into Jesus' mouth the words in which he disassociated himself from the God of the Bible thus leaving open the question of his sonship. They wanted, at all price, to turn the Holy Land into Palestine, which, finally, they did.
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lies he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. (John 8:44)
A Greek word translated as the “Jews” 'Ioudaioi” occurs 71 times in the fourth Gospel, most of the time in an antagonistic context, pitting that group against Jesus and his followers. Much of the ugly anti-Semitism of the last 2,000 years has been blamed on the Gospel of John. Hitler must have been influenced above all by the anti-Jewish statements of the Gospel of John (“children of light”=Christians; “children of darkness, or devil=Jews). John makes Jesus to believe that the Jews were children o devil.
The New Testament Heliocentrism for the “Children of Light”
The notion of “outer darkness” belongs to the heliocentric cosmology of the Aryans. The poetic figure of the Candle-Sun (See Mt. 5:15) stood for the Expanding Center exemplified in the Shri-Yantra mandala, which was composed around a central point – the metaphysical and irradiating point of primordial energy of Big Bang. The earliest state of disorganized creation or chaos was impelled towards the creation of a New Order (Dharma, Tao, Logos) whose heavenly nature holds from the center and spins all else around it because monarchy is necessary to the world for its well being (Dante). The swastika signifies the action of the origin or,vortex of the solar energy (Brahma) upon the Universe. The “outer darkness” is beyond the actual reach of the expanding center of light, or, using the poetic figure of the Persian poet Omar Khayyam “outside the box.” “And the light shineth in darkness and the darkness comprehended it not.” John 1:5. And Heliocentrism was a perennial religion of the Romans. The New Agers are trying to establish a New World Order aka Global Capitalism. Ahmadinejad is a modern apostle of Omar Khayyam.
Wells states, “Scholars do not dispute that one of the motives underlying the gospels is the desire to set Christianity in the right light in the eyes of the governing class and Roman officialdom generally.” Brandon demonstrates that a major theme of the gospels is the turning of blame for Jesus' death from the Romans to the Jews. St. Augustine stated: “I would not believe th Gospels if the authority of the Catholic Church did not compel me.
That explains all those investigations of the alleged war crimes committed by Israeli soldiers during the war in Gaza and elsewhere. One could say, the Israeli soldiers, unlike the good French or British colonizers, who worship Jesus Christ are the children of devil, who “was murderer from the beginning.”
When Th. Herzl approached Pope Pius X in Jan 1904, seeking his assistance for the Zionist venture, the pope dismissed him with these words: “We cannot favor this movement. The Jews did not recognize Jesus, our Lord, and we therefore cannot recognize the Jewish people. If you come to Palestine and settle your people there we will be ready with priests and churches to baptize you.” And Card. Roncalli, the future Pope John XXIII, was sufficiently cooperative with Pius XII’s anti-Semitic policy, to advise the Curia against Jewish transportation to Palestine, which might challenge Christian possession of the profitable Holy Places. That’s why six million had to die! No pope throughout centuries has ever prayed that the Jews would one day have their own state in their historical Promised Land. On the contrary, it was mostly the Catholic priests who incited the Christian, and now Palestinian mob to pogroms and to complete isolation of the Jews inside their ghettos. Is not the fence that Israel built along its border a result of the perennial Roman ghettoization policy vis-à-vis the Jews?
Well, Pope John Paul II in his relentless pursuit of Palestinian statehood met with “martyrdom seeking” terrorist fuehrer Y. Arafat 14 times, thus turning Palestinians into the Vatican’s new “chosen people”, which was the core of the Roman policy of hate towards the Jews. The anti-Semitic mob applauded. John Paul II’s mad monk Father T. Rydzyk through his radio and TV stations promotes the Stuermer’s-like anti-Semitic propaganda even though it is against the Polish law. But it is in agreement with mainstream world media. This sole fact adequately mirrors the Vatican obsession with and fear of the Jewish state. Because, the furious opposition of the Vatican notwithstanding, the Jewish people received, after centuries of dispersion, their Promised Land back; as the God of the Bible had promised them.
The fanatical obsession of establishing Palestinian state was adequately explained by the Palestinian ambassador to Lebanon Abbas Zaki on 14 May 2009: "With the two-state solution, in my opinion, Israel will collapse, because if they get out of Jerusalem, what will become of all the talk about the Promised Land and the Chosen People? What will become of all the sacrifices they made – just to be told to leave? They consider Jerusalem to have a spiritual status. The Jews consider Judea and Samaria to be their historic dream. If the Jews leave those places, the Zionist idea will begin to collapse. It will regress of its own accord. Then we will move forward."
And the “Brotherhood of Pius X” aka the New Agers paralleling John Paul II's Neocatholicism in their missionary efforts directed at Jews, would prefer that before leaving the scene, the Jews would first put their G-d to death, by admitting that their faith was based on a fiction. This would mean a complete victory, as far as the priorities of the 'Aryan ascended masters' are concerned. In other words they demand from the Jews the recognition of two pillars of materialistic buddhism: heliocentrism and evolutionism. That would prove beyond any doubt that the God of the Bible is really a liar who deceived His people with the false ideas of creationism and geocentrism. And that was the primary goal of the double rehabilitation of those materialistic and atheistic Sciences.
Copernican science enabled Hitler to proclaim that the Bible was “Jewish folklore and therefore contemptible nonsense”. The Nazis commemorated the four hundredth anniversary of publication of Copernicus’s The Revolution in 1943 by issuing a post stamp in the occupied part of Poland called Generalgouvernement bearing Copernicus’s portrait (the young seminarian K. Wojtyla used to put this stamp on his letters). In the same year the Poles could hear the triumphant tone of the news: “The Jews have disappeared from Europe,” and the “reservoir of the East from which the Jewish plague has for centuries beset the people of Europe has cased to exist!” In what sense did Copernicus’s book justify the Final Solution of the Jewish problem? By negating Christian tradition of Europe Copernicus removed the one and only obstacle, which stood in the way of the racial solution of the Jewish question. Indeed, the Holocaust did occur at a time when the Bible had definitively lost its power over men’s hearts.
In the book entitled Kopernikus-Forschungen (published in Leipzig 1943 when the Warsaw Ghetto was burning) Eugen Brachvogel explained how the Church “enriched” her teaching by promoting the Copernican heliocentrism. In the chapter entitled Griechischer und deutscher Geist in der kopernikanischen Anordnung der Planeten he reminded the opinion of Werner Jäger: “Ein Zeitalter ohne alle Tradition hat es nirgendwo gegeben und wird es nie gegeben. Es wäre die grauenhafteste Verödung und Verarmung des Menschenlebens, die sich niemand auch nur vorstellen kann…Immer wieder ist die Wandelstern des europäischen Geistes auf seiner mehr als 2000-järigen Bahn mit der hellenischen Sonne in Konjunktion geraten.” (p.35)
In the opinion of the Nazi pagan author the most important achievement of Copernicus was that he “brought the planet of the European Spirit into union with the Hellenic Sun”. Obviously, the Nazi author, while writing this paragraph had in mind Copernicus's passage in his book (I, 10) in which he praised the sun as a god “ruling his family of stars.” Thanks to Copernicus the traditional, solar religion of the Imperial Rome regained its superiority over Judaic Christianity and Islam.
In his First Report….on the Books of the Revolutions of…the Reverend Doctor Nicolaus Copernicus of Torun Rheticus wrote about Copernicus: “…he assumes new hypotheses, not indeed without divine inspiration and the favour of gods…” Invoking mythological gods in contradistinction to the Biblical monotheism was a common practice in the Renaissance period. Because the Renaissance had opposed to the Judeo-Christian ideal of obedience to revelation of God’s Law, the humanism of the Greeks. The early Christian rejected their pagan beliefs for the same reason as the author of the Martyrdom of George of Cappadocia who made the spirit to raise up from the dead a pagan called Boes, in order to tell Dadianus, the governor that he had been on earth a worshiper of the “stupid, dumb, deaf, and blind Apollo.”
Resigned to his Dumbness
Archbishop Dziwisz said the last words he heard the pope say were ‘totus tuus,” the pope’s Latin motto for “completely yours.” Well, the whole world saw the picture of the pope after his tracheoctomy, when he tried to say a few words. In vain! The only sound, the millions could have heard was something like a shriek and after that the pope resigned himself to his dumbness. I dare to think that it was the God of the Bible's critical review of John Paul II's pontificate.
Well, in his dedicatory letter to Pope Paul III, published with the Revolutions Copernicus extolled mathematics as his most important tool proving the intellectual superiority of Hellenistic heliocentrism over the biblical geocentrism.
Interestingly, Copernicus contradicting himself, did not use mathematics to prove the movements of the earth. Rather, totally in agreement with the spirit of the Renaissance paganism, he proved the immobility of the sun by pointing to the divine rank of the sun to whom the earth as his maid makes obeisance by circling his Majesty:
“W conceive immobility to be nobler and more divine that mutability and instability, which latter is therefore more appropriate to the earth than to the universe. I add to this that it would seem quite absurd to attribute motion to that which contains and locates, rather than to that which is contained and located – namely, the earth.” Well, in all materialistic systems throughout all ages motion is inseparable from matter.
Shakespeare immediately embraced the Copernican doctrine, because it justified the absolute power of all Christian monarchs, the pope included
The glorious planet Sol
In noble eminence enthroned and spher’d
Amidst the other…
The sun not only is the King of the sky
But he is like the King
And the King is like sun.
Contrary to the prevailing opinion that the Church persecuted heliocentric doctrine from the beginning, which culminated in the Galileo Trial, the letter of high ranking curialist cardinal Schoenberg encouraging Copernicus to publish his book and therefore printed as a second preface to The Revolutions points to something very important, namely the Copernicanism being the fulfillment of the gist of the Catholic atheistic theology as established by the so-called Angelic Doctor i.e. Thomas Aquinas:
Like Strato, Thomas Aquinas acknowledged atheist naturalism as in some measure an intellectually considerable alternative to theism: “ It seems that God does not exist. For if of the two contrary things one were to exist without limit the other would be totally eliminated. But what is meant by this word God is something good without limit. So if God were to have existed no evil would have been encountered. But evil is encountered in the world. Therefore, God does not exist.” The second objection of Aquinas is a statement of Naturalism, the view that all the phenomena of the Universe can and must be explained without reference to any principles in any sense “outside,” or “beyond.” In Summa Theologica Aquinas identified God with the impersonal, mechanical Eternal Reason of the philosophers which has nothing to do with the personal God of the Bible. In this way Th. Aquinas prepared way for Copernicus and his sun god as the ultimate natural ruler of Nature.. Thomas Aquinas’s critical judgment of the Ptolemaic system, which was regarded heretic by Rome, sounds like that: “The assumptions made by the astronomers are not necessarily true. Although these hypotheses seem to be in agreement with the observed phenomena we must not claim that they are true. Perhaps one could explain the observed motion of the celestial bodies in a different way which has not been discovered up to this time.” It is a paraphrase of Averroes, a vile atheist’s critic of the same system. In conformity with the natural religion of Aquinas.
Obviously the disciples of Thomas Aquinas had not ceased to worship. They had only given another form and a new name to the object of worship: having denatured God, they deified nature. They could, therefore, without self-consciousness, and with only a slight emendation in the sacred text, repeat the cry of the psalmist: “I will lift up mine eyes to Nature from whence cometh my help!”
The Exodus disclosed a God who was intensely concerned with human affairs. Whereas the surrounding gods were primarily nature deities, reifications of the numinous awe that people feel for nature’s grand phenomena, the Israelites’ God had come to them not through sun or storm or fertility but in a historical event. The difference in religious meaning was decisive.. The God that the Exodus disclosed cared enough about a human situation to step in and do something about it. That realization changed Israel’s religious agenda forever. No longer would the Jews be party to cajoling nature’s forces. They would rivet their attention on discerning Yahweh’s will and trying to enact it.
Interestingly, the well-known Polish poet Aleksander Wat who sought refuge during WWII in the USSR mentions in his Memoirs titled My Century that while he was doing time in the dreadful Lubyanka Prison in Moscow he could borrow from the prison library the books by St. Thomas Aquinas. The French Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin who was mourning his Church’s unwillingness to incorporate what Science had discovered into its understanding of the world, criticizing the “geocentricity” to which she clung psychologically for four hundred years after she had ceased to support it astronomically, and rebuking those religious thinkers who recognized nothing new under the sun since “instantaneous creation” is honored by the Moscow Museum of Atheism which is exhibiting his books. “Creationism” is as ugly word in the USA as it was in the USSR, or in the ancient Rome where to millions it seemed that everything was governed by the sheerest luck, or chance.
There are no gods: to say that Jove reigns is wrong;
'Tis a blind chance that moves the years along
Juvenal, Satire X
At a scientific convention in Chicago in 1980, over 150 of the world’s leading evolution experts faced the facts of the fossil record and virtually pronounced the death of Darwinism. They admitted that after 120 years of digging, the fossil record showed that there are no fossil links between one species and another, i.e., there are no transitional fossils. Thus, it was acknowledged that there is indeed a genetic barrier between species which renders impossible the theory that mankind evolved from apes...More>>> John Paul II silenced their voices by rehabilitating evolutionism.
Thomas Aquinas was a professor at the Paris Sorbonne and as such he can be considered as the father of the “bolshevik” French Revolution symbolized by an actress standing on the altar of Notre Dame as the goddess of Liberty. So it comes as no surprise that it was Aquinas's compatriot a certain engineer Foucault who built a machine which allegedly proves the truth of the Copernican system and at the same time explains away the existence of the God of the Bible. Foucault's Pendulum is a reminder that the French Revolution of 1789 and its anti-Semitic slogan Ecrasez l'infame never really ended. In the mind of French revolutionaries and especially of Voltaire, the Jews were relics of a barbarous and obscurantist past, and as such were unworthy of the rights of free men..
William James observed in his book Scientists: “There never lived a set of men more blinded by dogma to the meaning of the past, to the trend of the future, by the belief that they had a new truth (for New Age). No one of them can lift the stone and show what lies under Darwin’s demonstration. They run about with little pamphlets and proclaim a New Universe (aka Theosophists' New Age) like Frenchmen. They bundle up all beliefs into a great Dogma of Unbelief, and throw away the kernel of life with the shell…”
The most important observation regarding the human psychology states: “ It is not scientific to invent theories to explain away that which you do not like...Even scientists have not been able to explain life so far.”
Here is how the Encyclopedia Americana describes the working of this deceitful device:
Foucault's Pendulum is dependent on the principle enunciated in Newton's Firs Law of motion, that a mass moving in straight line tends to maintain both the direction and speed of its motion unless it is acted on by some external force.
First of all, the mention of Newton's first law of motion in the context of this device reminds of the cult of the Soviet party bosses who always opened their speeches by quoting a line from the “bible” of dialectic materialism” which proclaimed that there is no matter without motion. This law is contradicted by a magnetic device centered in the floor beneath which issues its command to a cylinder hidden in the heart of the sphere, thus assuring continual motion. (Umberto Eco, Foucault's Pendulum. Translated from Italian by William Weaver. Ballantine Books 1988, p. 3) This is confirmed by Wikipedia: “Foucault pendulums in museums often incorporate an electromagnetic or other drive to keep the bob swinging; others are restarted regularly. In the latter case, a launching ceremony may be performed as an added show.”
In Umberto Eco's international bestseller a student wearing glasses explains the functioning of the pendulum to a girl as follows:
“It proves the rotation of the earth. Since the point of suspension doesn't move...”
“Why doesn't it move?”
“Well, because a point... the central point, I mean, the one right in the middle of all the points you see ...it's a geometric point; you can't see it because it has no dimension, and if something has no dimension, it can't move, no right or left, not up or down. So it doesn't rotate with the earth. You understand? It can't even rotate around itself. There is no itself.”
“But the earth turns.”
“The earth turns, but the point doesn't. That's how it is. Just take my word for it.” The pertinent question here is: How can you suspend anything on something that has no dimension? Only if you can imagine the axis of the earth rotation as a Euclidean line, the North or South Pole would be such fixed points.
“Once set in motion, the pendulum will continue to oscillate with a constant amplitude. It also tends to swing continuously in the same vertical plane in terms of a coordinate system fixed in space, except as constrained by gravity. But the earth itself, as a result of its daily motion, will rotate constantly beneath the pendulum bob. If a graduated circular dial is placed beneath the pendulum, the linear path of the pendulum's motion will apparently rotate around the dial's center like the hands of a clock. If the Foucault pendulum is located at either of the earth's geographic poles, this apparent rotation will occur in exactly 24 hours. Actually, it is the earth that has rotated beneath the pendulum in this period while the pendulum's direction of motion remains fixed in space. This is a common laboratory proof of the earth's rotation.”
Well, if it is the earth that rotates constantly beneath the pendulum which makes the pendulum's bob to imitate the hands of a clock we wouldn't expect it to swing freely in any direction which is made possible by a ball-bearing pivot at the top of the cable. The fixed point of suspension mentioned by Eco's student stands for the stationary sun of the Copernican system. We can measure time by translating the movements of the sun into the earth's movement. But could we do the same if both the sun and the earth moved. Could you tell me what time is it if both the dial and the hands of your watch moved?
Foucault's original pendulums at Paris rotated clockwise at a rate of more than 11° per hour, or with a period of about 32 hours per complete rotation. The rate of rotation of a Foucault pendulum can be stated mathematically as equal to the rate of rotation of the Earth times the sine of the number of degrees of latitude. Because the Earth rotates once a sidereal day, or 360° approximately every 24 hours, its rate of rotation may be expressed as 15° per hour, which corresponds to the rate of rotation of a Foucault pendulum at the North or South Pole. At latitude 30° N—for example, at Cairo or New Orleans—a Foucault pendulum would rotate at the rate of 7.5° per hour, for the sine of 30° is equal to one-half. The rate of rotation of a Foucault pendulum at any given point is, in fact, numerically equal to the component of the Earth's rate of rotation perpendicular to the Earth's surface at that point.
Which means that, judging by Foucault's pendulum, certain regions of the earth rotate faster or slower than the others. Our watches show otherwise. Under Foucault's mechanical tyrant the natural cycle of day and night would be disturbed. People living closer to the equator would be forced to work longer than the people living in the circumpolar zones.
Foucault's pendulum, which I call Foucault's merry-go-round, gives the distinct impression to viewers that they are watching a process which proves the Earth is rotating, the signs tell them flatly that such is the case. Viewers assume that this Pendulum is giving observable proof that the earth is moving. They are told on the signs that they are viewing a scientific demonstration which proves the earth is moving. Everybody knows that (having learned it as a scientifically proven fact that throughout their school years) that the Earth is rotating on an axis and orbiting the sun. Now they see the confirmation before their very eyes. Who now can doubt the “science god of truth?!” aka “Stupid, dumb, deaf, and blind Apollo.” Who now dares to believe the Bible is without error?! People watch a minute or two, read the message, and go to another taxpayer supported “educational” display which tells them that life on earth has been evolving for three billion years and that they are the end result of that evolutionary process (M. Hall, The Earth is not Moving. 1991, p.170). Like the Aryan Ape King, Hanuman.In other words, exactly like in the above mentioned Moscow Museum of Athism. Foucault's merry-go-round and the so-called moon walk giving the false impression of the moving earth belong to the same magic repertoire. Indeed, in the heliocentric hoax the moon has to go on its trajectory around the sun in the opposite direction than the earth, but this dogma itself belies the heliohoax, because it suggests that the moon is moving back and forth at the same time, which inspired Lenin's dialectical derogatory dogma of 1904 about the party of Mensheviks going one step forward and two steps back.
There is one Foucault Pendulum in New York, in the UN Building, there's another one in the science museum in San Francisco, and God knows, how many others. Pendulum's presence in the UN Building proves how important for the religious purposes of the New Agers the Copernican hypothesis is. This pendulum stands for ecumenism in hatred expressed by ideologically kindred movements: the Renaissance paganism, the Nazism and the Palestinian solar baalism.
Bertrand Russel expressed his reservation toward mathematics as the ultimate proof of truth even more succinctly: “Physics is mathematical not because we know so much about the physical world, but because we know so little: it is only its mathematical properties that we can discover.”
Pope John Paul’s Speech
In his speech of reply to the members of the Pontifical Academy and other distinguished guests the Pope explained:
The problem posed by theologians of that age was, therefore, that of the compatibility between heliocentrism and scripture. Thus the new science, with its methods and the freedom of research which they implied, obliged theologians to examine their own criteria of scriptural interpretation. Most of them did not know how to do so. It was French Cardinal Poupard who wrote his speech. The Pope caps this with a generous tribute to Galileo the theologian: ‘Paradoxically, Galileo, a sincere believer, showed himself to be more perceptive in this regard than the theologians who opposed him.’
One last remark, When you go to a Chinese restaurant, you can see the cooks preparing your meals, but you are not allowed to see the underground mechanism of Foucault's Pendulum. When Marshall Hall, the author of The Earth Is Not Moving went to Paris to investigate closely the device a “series of mishaps prevented him from access to its inner working,” which he mentions in his book. Because the French diplomats need a “Scientific” justification for their branding Israel as a “little, shitty country.” The French revolutionary slogan Ecrasez l'infame is still leading the French scientists in their anti-Biblical propaganda. It was the Red Army, which after capturing Poland in the 1940s recognized as its most important task to launch the University named after Copernicus in Torun, where he was born. John Paul II, so to say, canonized it by his rehabilitation of Galileo with the help of the Soviet physicist A. Sakharov, who was proving in his researches that the sun is immortal, like the mythological phoenix.
The following is an excerpt from Prof. Stuart A. Kauffman's Online article titled
Breaking the Galilean Spell:
“Even deeper than emergence and its challenge to reductionism in this new scientific worldview is what I call breaking the Galilean spell. Galileo rolled balls down incline planes and showed that the distance traveled varied as the square of the time elapsed. From this he obtained a universal law of motion. Newton followed with his Principia, setting the stage for all of modern science. With these triumphs, the Western world came to the view that all that happens in the universe is governed by natural law. Indeed, this is the heart of reductionism. Another Nobel laureate physicist, Murray Gell-Mann, has defined a natural law as a compressed description, available beforehand, of the regularities of a phenomenon. The Galilean spell that has driven so much science is the faith that all aspects of the natural world can be described by such laws. Perhaps my most radical scientific claim is that we can and must break the Galilean spell. Evolution of the biosphere, human economic life, and human history are partially indescribable by natural law. This claim flies in the face of our settled convictions since Galileo, Newton, and the Enlightenment.” Breaking the Galilean Spell actually means Breaking the Thomistic Spell.
In the Latin tradition the words ‘God’ and ‘Nature’ are interchangeable and that explains the equivalence of Aquinas's God with Natural Laws (the Vatican brands in vitro fertilization because it is against Natural Laws not against God's Laws) and Copernicus sun god replacing easily the God of the Bible. But the creative acts of Nature are not the same as the creative Acts of YHWH described in the first chapter of the book of Genesis. There is no word 'nature' in the Bible and there is no entry 'nature' in the Encyclopedia Judaica. In this context the entry 'nature' in M. Eliade's Encyclopedia of Religion should be read
Will Durant, in one of his books wrote, Anaxagoras’s On Nature (480 B.C.) was acclaimed by the intelligentsia of Athens as the greatest scientific work of the century. It carried on the traditions and speculations of the Ionian school. The universe, said Anaxagoras, was originally a chaos of diverse seeds (spermata), pervaded by a nous, or Reason, akin to the source of life and motion in ourselves. And as reason gives order to the chaos of our actions, so the World Reason gave order to the primeval seeds, setting them into a rotatory vortex (Aristophanes in his The Clouds satirized this vortex as Socrates’ substitute for Zeus; Newton identified his gravity with the 'spiritual body' of Jesus Christ), and guiding them toward the development of organic forms. This rotation sorted the seeds into the four elements – fire, air, water, and earth – and separated the world into two revolving layers, and outer one of “ether” and an inner one of air. In consequence of this violent whirling motion, the surrounding fiery ether tore away stones from the earth, and kindled them into stars. The sun and stars are glowing masses of rock. Probably other celestial bodies are inhabited like the earth (original idea of aliens); upon them “men are formed, and other animals that have life. All organisms were originally generated out of earth, moisture and heat, and thereafter from one another. Man has developed beyond other animals because his erect posture freed his hands for grasping things (squirrels use their front legs while eating their nuts but that doesn't turn them into humans). The speculations made Anaxagoras at once the Copernicus and Darwin of his age. The Athenians might have forgiven him these hypotheses had he not neglected his nous in explaining the events of nature and history; they suspected that his nous was a device for saving his skin (exactly like the Logos is in the Gospel of John). He aroused the simple by giving a natural explanation of meteors, and reduced many mythical figures to personified abstractions. The Athenians took him good-humoredly for a time, merely nicknaming him Nous. Cleon, his rival, brought a formal indictment of impiety against him on the charge that he had described the sun (still to the people a god) as a mass of stone on fire, and the philosopher was convicted. Copernicus did not repeat his mistake and called the sun Reason of the World, and therefore sun god.
Teilhard de Chardin believed that belief in God and assent to the theory of evolution are completely compatible. In his Phenomenon of Man, he teaches that the law of entropy applies merely to the without of things, and that it must be complemented by a law of complexification that explains the within of things. The law of complexification governs the emergence from matter of life, intelligence, and spirituality, and finally directs the entire evolutionary process to its termination in the Omega Point, which is God himself. Well, in the Aryan mythology God is called “puru” i.e. Point, like the point which explodes in Big Bang and expands the world and then after the Big Crunch it returns to the same point, called by The French Jesuit the Omega Point, which is a variant of nirvana. The Nazis translated the slogan Ecrasez l'infame Juda verrecke.
What Ecrasez l'infame really means
Plato called by the church fathers “divine Plato” said that a poor man...who was no longer able to work because of sickness should be left to die.” (Alvin Schmidt, How Christianity Changed the World, 2004, p. 128)
“The graceful Greeks laughed at the 'graceless' Jews for recoiling in horror at the Greek custom of exposing an infant to death when the shape of its skull or nose did not please them.” (Max Dimont, Jews, God and History, 1994, p.108)
“Society as great authorized agent of life must be made responsible for every unsuccessful life – it has to pay for it, so it must prohibit it.” -A. Hitler, Mein Kampf
Voltaire said that Plato should have been canonized by the Christian Church, for, being the propounder of the Christos mystery, he contributed more to its fundamental doctrines than any other single individual. Some argue that Plato's tyranny, his cruelty and lust for dominance are forgivable because he was writing so early in the history of rationalism. Well, the Ten Commandments were revealed even earlier. Plato famously warned of the evil of democracy. Well. Hitler turned the Jews into slaves and let them die of starvation and cruel, sadistic treatment.
Immaculata:
Already in the 50s, when Wojtyla was getting his doctorate in theology, his dissertation director, the eminent Fr. Garrigou-Lagrange (perhaps THE greatest theologian of the 20th century) wrote on his dissertation: “You write a lot, but you don’t say much.” Fr. Garrigou knew *garbage* when he saw it.
Main Entry: glibPart of Speech: adjectiveDefinition: slick, smooth-talkingSynonyms: artful, articulate, easy, eloquent, facile, fast-talking, flip, fluent, garrulous, hot-air, insincere, loquacious, plausible, quick, ready, silver-tongued, slippery, smooth operator, smooth-spoken, smooth-tongued, suave, talkative, urbane, vocal, vocative, voluble.

Big Bang or, the Aryan Genesis

Big Bang theory also referred to as Modern “Genesis” retired the Biblical Genesis because the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske imparted to the enthusiastic audiences his conviction that the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world. According to this Aryan “Genesis”, we are bundles of atoms i.e. bundles of energy at the quantum level, and bundles of energy consist of 99.99999% empty space. We are all transparent, so to say and can pass through a closed door.
In the beginning was the Word (John 1:1)
The Universe does not grow out of Spirit and Matter – two separate conceptions – it is an evolution from Spirit-Matter, or the One with a dual aspect. You find H.P. Blavatsky laying a great stress on this fundamental unity which yet becomes dual in manifestation, Spirit-Matter, Purusha-Pradhana. Pradhana, which is the essence of Matter, Purusha, which is the essence of Spirit; when these disappear, the form of Vishnu that is Time remains. Fohat underlies all forces, and by it the force of electricity is generated.
With this there comes Sound. You cannot have motion in matter without generating vibration; and all vibration is changeable into Sound, transmutable into Sound; and the old phrase that the Serpent glides hissing though Space carries with it a very real signification. Therefore is it that the first property generated in Akasha is Sound – the Word, the Logos; the whole universe is but the uttering of the Word which is latent in the unmanifested Logos; it is this spoken word which is the objective Kosmos. Sound without which form cannot be, Sound which is the builder of the form, which generates form, every sound having its own form, every sound being of this triple character, that it generates form, and it upholds form, that it destroys form. Thus once again, the Trimurti appears, the Creator, the Preserver, the Destroyer; they are all one in different aspects, for the Divine is One, whatever the form of its manifestation.
According to Popcak the answer to Deepak Chopra’s question“Does God have orgasms?” is “Absolutely yes. My own faith tradition teaches that God is a lover and that the cosmological orgasm physicists refer to as the Big Bang... is the model for human sexuality. Who wouldn’t give their eye teeth for a night like that with their beloved?”
A few years ago, Father George Coyne, head of the Vatican Observatory Research Group suggested that we might view stars as God's sperm, which is the basic teaching of the Aryan cosmogony. In the Hindu Myth when the desire arose in it (i.e. in the sun god in the shape of linga (phallus) and BANG! The “creation” or rather emanation or emission (ejaculation) of semen followed. The Christian heretic Justin who envisaged Jesus as ever-existent “seed-sowing Reason” believed that the good God was an erect phallus, like Shiva (Hippolytus, Refutation 5.7.21-22).
Well, Jesus’ saying, Verily I say unto you, That the pimps (publicans) and the prostitutes (harlots) go into the Kingdom of God before you (Mt 21:31) should be read in this context.
In old chronicles syphilis was called “Canonical Flu”. Well, it was Pope Boniface VIII (1294-1303) who forbade priests to keep butcher shops, brothels, and to serve as go-betweens for prostitutes. John Paul II made sure, when it came time to clean the “Last Judgment”, that the restorers removed about half the leggings, breech, cloth, and other draping with which the Curia had hidden Michelangelo’s Bacchic nudes, years after the painting had been completed. Recall that in the Renaissance period Rome was called Coda Mundi, the world’s anus by those who deplored the mercenariness of its clergy and the number of prostitutes who felt absolved by the nudities of “holy” icons. This pornocracy initiated by one of the early Popes endures.
Cross and Big Bang
Regardless of the swastika’s configuration, i.e. right-angled (embraced by the Nazis) or left-angled (as on the chest of Buddha statue in Hong Kong), the symbol’s significance does not suffer; it merely indicates two opposing principles, evolution and dissolution.
The Hindus believe that the universe periodically dissolves (Cp. Big Bang’s contraction) and is then “re-created” (cp. Big Bang’s expansion). The period between dissolution and “re-creation” is known as “Pralaya”, a time of rest between creative periods. A period of creativity is called “Manvantara” and both periods constitute a “Kalpa” or a cycle of “creation.” The dissolutionary process has been labeled by Western cosmologists as “the big crunch”. The entire creative process is again more descriptively labeled by the Hindus as “the breathing out of Brahma” while the dissolutionary process is seen as “the breathing in of Brahma”. This cyclic process of cosmic, periodic, involution, evolution and dissolution is symbolized by the forward and backward movement of the cross.
The ancient Vedic seers described the original cosmic creative process as “the churning of the milky ocean” whereby fields of subtle substance become condensed into gross matter; a view that is now widely accepted today in energy-field physics research. The Brownian movement is also a miniature replica of “the churning of the milky ocean.” This “churning” is represented geometrically in Tantric ritual as a four armed cross within a circle and the cross is meant to be imagined as oscillating backwards and forwards as in a churning motion. The forward movement marked by right-angled break of the arms of the cross, and thus forming a swastika, is towards evolution while the left-angled break marks movement towards dissolution. The circle represents the universe in its potential un-manifested state prior to creation and is called in Hinduism “Brahmanda”.
How Cross was transformed into Swastika
Passing back over the millenniums down through them all into still older ruins of a civiliza­tion that has left no trace, save in these deep buried records; even there you shall find a Cross marked on pottery that has long outlasted the very bones of thy people that made it; for the pottery, found beside little heaps of dust that vanish when the tomb is opened, has graven on it the symbol of the Cross, and buried by the side of the dead conveys its own sacred signification. Go back as far as you will into the antiquities of this - the most ancient of all lands so far as the Fifth Race of man is con­cerned - there is no place where you will not find this symbol; in the most ancient of the Scriptures you will find the Cross, representing, in later times, the circle of the horizon, representing farther back the form of Vishnu, which is Time. The circle symbolizes Time unending, and within it a Cross on which lie all Gods, all Rishis, all Suns and all Stars, everything which is in the manifested uni­verse. Go farther back, before the Fifth Race is born - back into those times of which no record remains, save in the hands of the Initiates them­selves - here and there is a rock of which they only can explain the meaning, and on these rocks, deep graven, there still is found the figure of the Cross.
Jesus answered, Verily, Verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of
Water and of the Spirit (=Fire, like in the cloven tongues of Fire which sat on Apostles' heads
(Acts 2:3) he cannot enter into the Kingdom of god. John (3:5)
It was in the circle always in the oldest records; in later times the circle has fallen away from it, and the Cross, losing the circle, became degraded from its loftiest significance. Always the symbol has its highest meaning in the Spirit; and from the spiritual sphere it comes downward into outer manifestation and finds a second explanation in the stars which are the outer forms of the great Intelligences, by which the Kosmos moves; and then lower still it falls, until it comes down to man, and then it becomes more degraded in its latest phallic signification, polluted by the impure thoughts that flow to it from the mind in man. Take then the circle, and in its earliest significance it stands for that Boundless Existence which, coming into manifestation, circumscribes Itself. First, we have been taught of a circle of light bounded by darkness which has no limit; and the circle of light is the beginning of the manifested Kosmos. Thus we found in studying light that first we had light without form, and then later form came as the visible side of the manifestation; and the circle in its earliest significance means manifestation, therefore limitation, the beginning of things. The Cross which, as the next stage, divides it is that fire which, flashing from the centre outwards, makes two diameters, gives active life within this circle of the universe, and makes possible the evolution which from the centre is gradually to proceed. At first, one line of the Cross is the line drawn in both directions by the light of the Logos from the centre outwards to the circumference - that light of the Logos that I spoke of in the second lecture, as shining out from the dual Logos, from that which we saw as Fire and Water, that which is Spirit-Matter, shining out from the centre which is the unmanifested Logos; this, passing outwards to the circumference, divides the circle first into two and then into four. It is this line of light starting from the point, passing outwards in the four directions, that traces the first Cross in manifestation, the symbol of the division into Spirit and Matter.Then coming down a little further and recognizing this division of Spirit and Matter, there is the generation of the Kosmos, which is symbolized by the revolution of the Cross, so that the Cross is no longer two straight lines, but to each arm of the Cross there is attached a part of the circle of manifestation, and you get the ancient Swastika, which gives not only the idea of division, but also the idea of revolution. In the Swastika, with the limbs turned, there is a sugges­tion of the circle as well as of the Cross, but no longer of the circle set and steady, but of the circle revolving, having therefore become a generating force of life. ! (Annie Besant. Building of the Cosmos – www.anandgholap.net/Building_Of_the_Cosmos-AB.htm)
In the Egyptian religion you will find the Cross and the circle changed in appearance. The Cross is no longer the Cross which is traced on the circle of Time, with its two arms of equal length. It has become the letter T with one arm below the other, and instead of being within the circle of Time, the circle has gone outside it and rests on the top of the Tau. The circle is no longer Time, it stands for the female principle. In other words the cross in the Egyptian religion regained its orginal Aryan symbolism, that of Shivalinga.
To this day, Shiva is worshiped in the image of his organ of procreation, often alone, and frequently conjoined with the corresponding female organ, which is sculpted to receive Siva's seed.
This representation of Shiva is known as the lingam. The word lingam literally means a 'sign' or distinguishing mark. Thu says the Linga Purana: “The distinctive sign by which one can recognize the nature of something is called lingam.” Primarily, the glowing, flaming linga was a pillar of fire, connecting heaven and earth.
In Vedic hyms, Rudra (an epithet for Shiva) is identified with Agni, who in these sacred texts is deified as the carrier of the sacrificial offerings to the gods for whom they are intended. Hence, Agni is the mediator between men and gods, and acts as a metaphysical bridge between the two, just like the cosmic linga. A pertinent observation here is that every creative process is accompanied by the generation of heat. Indeed the sexual act is nothing but the offering of the seed of life into the sacred fire of love. Hence, Agni, the God of Fire, is eminently suited as a metaphoric emblem of the tejas (creative heat) of Shiva.
In his aniconic form Shiva is visualized as the cosmic pillar. Yet this pillar also evokes his phallus. As an abstract shape, the pillar symbolizes a purely conceptual reality that cannot be sensed in material terms. Visually however, the shape of the cylindrical pillar with a rounded top resembles that of the phallus. Also when the time came for Shiva to reveal himself to both Brahma and Vishnu, he did so in the form of a linga. Hence the linga is an object of the greatest sanctity, more sacred than any anthropomorphic image of Shiva. Not surprisingly thus, the innermost sanctuary of all Shiva temples is reserved for the linga, while the outer precincts of the sacred architecture may show him in his human form. Indeed, though his iconic images abound, no such image ever occupies the center of attention in a Shiva temple, this honor being reserved exclusively for his linga.
In Stoic philosophy, which began with Zeno of Citium c. 300 BCE, the logos was the active reason pervading the universe and animating it. It was conceived of as material, and is usually identified with God or Nature. The Stoics also referred to the seminal logos, ("logos spermatikos") or the law of generation in the universe, which was the principle of the active reason working in inanimate matter. Humans, too, each possess a portion of the divine logos. The Egyptian god Atum creates the world by masturbating. The texts say that the god ejaculated (BANG) to his mouth and simultaneously spat creatively. We have here combination of phallus and mouth that points to logos spermatikos.Stoic philosophers identified their creative logos with Hermes, so that the special doctrine of the logos spermatikos takes on a phallic connotation. Justin adopted the Stoic doctrine of the “seed of God, the Word.” that impregnated the virgin in order to become something physical or “flesh” (Apology, 32). Hermes was worshiped by the name of Phales, derived from Phalos and in the image of phallic stone (M. Eliade, Encyclopedia of Religions, entry phallus). Justin was executed for his teaching, but at the same time he was recognized a Martyr. The god Atum's Martyr!
In other words, the swastika or Fylfot Cross is derived from the sun wheel (a cross within a circle) by breaking the circumference of the circle (Rudolfph Koch, The Book of Signs.1955, p.18) Because the universe is seen as evolving from the central Sun, the point (puru), the ever-congealed germ. The lotus flower, represented as growing out of Vishnu’s navel is the most graphic allegory of this process ever made. In chapter LXXXI of the Egyptian Book of the Dead, called “Transformation into the Lotus,” a head emerging from this flower, the god exclaims: “I am the pure lotus, emerging from the Luminous one…I carry the messages of Horus. I am the pure lotus which comes from the Solar Fields…”
The Hindu Big bang was well-known to ancient Romans which is confirmed by the two “pralaya” swastikas (i.e. right-angled and left-angled swastikas) on a Roman tombstone from Spain. (See picture in: Prudence Jones and Nigel Pennick a History of Pagan Europe. London and New York 1955, p. 55) This tombstone which simply expresses the philosophical idea of resurrection inspired father Le Maitre with his idea of Big Bang which he brought to the New World. America embraced the Big Bang the same as it earlier embraced Copernican heliocentrism after Father Settele, a professor of astronomy in Rome and Washington. proclaimed it as a fact. We see the same inspiration in the icon of Jesus Christ in a painting of the descent from the cross in the church of Rennes-les-Bains, the crown of thorns has been given the appearance of a gigantic spider.
The spider belongs to the mythological lore of the Brahmins who assert, that the world arose from the infinite spider, who spun the whole complicated mass from his bowels, and annihilates afterwards the whole or any part of it, by absorbing it again, and resolving it into his own essence.
For the life of Brahman is not as the life of man. His life, as it were, includes the infinite lives that it generates, and each of these is but the wink of an eye to that life which is eternal; and though as he out-breathes he breathes out the flames, and though as he in-breathes he breathes the flames in once more, still to him it is but as the wink of an eyelid; and what to us is millions of years is to him but the shortest space that we can imagine. What from the standpoint can be Nirvana, or separation of consciousness? What from that standpoint can mean our words of Manvantara and Pralaya? It is the infinite Fire sending out its flames into space and gathering them back into its bosom again, and again sending them out in ceaseless undulations.
The Same Motif in the Babylonian Cosmology:
The Sun Impels them Forward, then Draws them Back
“From astronomical speculations the Chaldeans had deduced a whole system of religious dogmas. The sun, set in the midst of the superimposed planets, regulates their harmonious movements. As its heat impels them forward, then draws them back, it is constantly influencing, according to its various aspects, the direction of their course and their action upon the earth. Fiery heart of the world, it vivifies the whole of this great organism, and as the stars obey its command, it reigns supreme over the universe. The radiance of its splendor illuminates the divine immensity of the heavens, but at the same time in its brilliance there is intelligence (therefore Copernicus called the Sun, Reason of the World – rp); it is the origin of all reason, and, as a tireless sower it scatters unceasingly on the world below the seeds of a harvest of souls. Our brief life is but a particular form of the universal life…This coherent and magnificent theology, founded upon the discoveries of ancient astronomy in its zenith, gradually imposed on mankind the cult of the “Invincible Sun” as the master of all nature, creator and preserver of men.” (Astrology and Religion Among the Greeks and Romans).
Expansion and Contraction of Big Bang in Greek Mythology
The fact that the universe presents itself as both a unity and multiplicity suggests that it really is both one and many at the same time. Interestingly, this cosmological approach is implicitly reflected in the sacred symbolism of Delphi, the central Greek shrine where both Apollo and Dionysus have “an equal share.” (Plutarch, The E at Delphi 388E) That is because, in Greek theology, Apollo represents the principle of unity and Dionysus represents the principle of multiplicity. Apollo is “recollection”, the return movement of multiplicity towards divine unity, while Dionysus is “manifestation”, the first movement of unity towards divine multiplicity. As Neo-Platonist Proclus observes, “To divide and produce wholes into parts, and to preside over the distribution of forms, is Dionysiacal; but to perfect all things harmonically, is Apolloniacal” (Proclus, Commentaries on the Timaeus of Plato, II, p. 77). As one philosopher neatly summed up the matter, “When Dionysus had projected his reflection in the mirror, he followed it and was thus scattered over the universe. Apollo gathers him and brings him back to heaven, for he is the purifying God and truly the Saviour of Dionysos.” What Abbé Lemaître referred to as “the moment of creation” when the universe was at its smallest size, Pythagoras, the originator of the classical heliocentrism called monad indicating that it is both a primeval Unity and apart (monas) from all other things, transcending time, space, and the multiplicity of the phenomenal world. The same idea is behind the expanding and contracting point of Big Bang hypothesis. Behind this perverted science lies the Pythagorean dogma proclaiming that extended physical bodies are composed of nonextended mathematical points. Accordingly, Zeno argued that everything in the universe is both infinitely large and has no size at all. The infinite divisibility of any physical body regardless of size means that it is composed of an infinite number of elements and thus is infinitely large. On the other hand, the body has no size at all because no number of nonextended units can produce an extended body. The ancient Greeks referred to the whole process as Logos, the same Logos which in the Gospel of John creates the whole universe and sends the God of the Bible into retirement.
Plato's Big Bang: Broken Apart and Reassembled
Plato's Timaeus contains a very detailed discussion of virtually all aspects of physical existence, including biology, cosmology, geography, chemistry, physics, psychological perceptions, etc., all expressed in terms of these four basic elements and their transmutations from one into another by means of the constituent triangles being broken apart and re-assembled into other forms according to the dogma of Eternal Recurrence in Cyclical Time. (Newton's comments about the “sides” of light particles are very reminiscent of Plato's language in Timaeus (Platonic Solids and Plato's Theory of Everything www.log4.com/log/pix03A/030813-Resurrection2.jpg)
The frontispiece of the book The Migration of Symbols by Count Goblet d’Alviella is a representation of Apollo, from a vase in the Kunsthistorisches Museum of Vienna; on the middle of Apollo’s breast there is a large and prominent swastika. In other words, the Greeks, like the Brahmins, regarded their sun god Helios, or Apollo as a chakravartin, a supreme ruler who ruled the four quarters of the world. According to quite a few websites this god failed NASA miserably; he never landed on the moon. Rather he was faking the whole show in a secret military base in the Nevada desert, the so-called area 51. On the chest of a giant Buddha Statue in Hong Kong a left-angled swastika is displayed proclaiming that the world is in the process of dissolution...
Thinking Atoms or, Cogito ergo sum or Descartes's Material God (Spirit-Matter)
Parmenides pictures himself as the philosopher traveling along the road leading from the palace of Night to the palace of Day where he is introduced to the goddess of light. (Liberty Statue) He is told by the goddess that he will be given the knowledge of all things. The positive truth she tells him, is that “Being is” and “Non-Being is not”; it is therefore wrong to believe that “Being is not, and non-Being must be.” The goddess says that thinking and being are one and the same. It would follow that what cannot be thought cannot be. Non being cannot be thought and, hence, cannot be. Being is one. It suffers no alterations. It cannot be thought to come to be (Because then it would not have been “being”; it is void of beginning, without any ceasing. Conversely, Non being cannot, by definition, come to be. The goddess warns Parmenides to avoid the error of believing like Heraclitus that being and Non being equally exist. Plato insisted that non-being is itself a form of being. The character of being is, therefore, that it is one, eternal, indivisible, boundless, and perfect.
Res Cogitans
...for one thing are Thinking and Being...
...and to me 'tis indifferent
Whence I begin, for thither again thou shalt find me returning
Res Extensa
One continuous one; for of it what birth shalt thou search for?
How and whence it hath sprung? I shall not permit thee to tell me,
Neither to think: 'Of what is not,' 'for none can say or imagine
How Not-Is becomes Is; or else what need should have stirred it.
“It is atoms in us that think,” said Epicurus after Democritus. But my friend, how does an atom think? Admit that you have no idea!”
From Democritus to Galileo and Newton
From his theory of atoms Democritus derived an explanation of perception. Every object gives off or imprints on the atoms of the air images of itself, which travel through the air, reach the eye of the beholder, and then interact with its atoms. The product of that interaction passes to the mind and, in turn interacts with its atoms. He thus anticipated, albeit in largely incorrect detail, today's theory of vision, which holds that photons of light, emanating from an object travel to the eye, enter it, and stimulate, the endings of the optic nerves, which sends messages to the brain, where they act on the brain's neurons. All knowledge, according to Democritus, results from the interactions of the transmitted images with the mind. Like Protagoras, he concluded that this means we have no way of knowing whether our perceptions correctly represent what is outside or whether anyone else's perception is identical with our own. As he put it, “We know nothing for certain, but only the changes in our body produced by the forces that impinge upon it.”
Having visited Galileo and been greatly impressed by his physics, Hobbes concluded that all events are matter in motion; applying this to psychology, he reasoned that all mental activities must be motions of atoms in the nervous system and brain reacting to motions of atoms in the external world. He did not say how the movements of atoms in the brain could be a thought; he simply asserted that a metaphor for “life”, and that all talk of the soul as an incorporeal substance is “vain philosophy” and “pernicious Aristotelian nonsense.”
From Newtonian physics David Hartley (1705-1757) derived the idea that external vibrations in matter must cause corresponding vibrations of infinitesimal particles within the nerves (which, he rightly asserted were solid, not hollow). These vibrations produced miniature counterparts or “vibratiuncles ... the physiological counterpart of ideas”.
Big Bang and the Jewish Holocaust
Theosophy which became the surrogate religion of Anglo-American intellectual elites is dreaming about “the day when the mind of the western race has broken away from Mosaic chronology and Mosaic ideas of man and nature.” (See William W. Judge The Ocean of Theosophy. 1893, p.62) And that explains their admiration for men like A. Hitler or Ahmadinejad who speaks so eagerly about wiping Israel off the map.
During WWII the people in the State Department who were most closely associated with the rescue of Jews were Assistant Secretary Breckenridge Long and several middle-level officials. They included George Brandt, Long’s executive assistant, James Dunn and Wallace Murray, departmental advisers on political relations, Ray Atherton, acting chief of the Division of European Affairs, Howard Travers, chief of the Visa Division, and a number of lesser officers, especially R. Borden Reams. These men were indifferent to the tragedy of the European Jews. Randolph Paul of the Treasury Department described them as an American “underground movement…to let the Jews be killed.” That was confirmed by an eighteen-page memorandum on State Department obstruction entitled Report to the Secretary (of Treasury) on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews. Led by DuBois, the Foreign Funds Control staff prepared this searing indictment, which charged that the State Department was “guilty not only of gross procrastination and willful failure to act, but even of willful attempts to prevent action from being taken to rescue Jews from Hitler.
Towards a New Pornocracy and the World Without Jews
Christopher West’s appearance on Nightline, during which he praised Hugh Hefner and asserted that John Paul II advanced the sexual revolution “in the right direction,” is but the latest in a long series of scandals arising from West’s promotion of “John Paul II’s Theology of the Body” (TOB).
TOB, West exclaims, “has already begun a ‘sexual counter-revolution’ that’s changing lives around the world. The ‘fire’ is spreading and in due time we can expect global repercussions.” Not impressed? Wait, there’s more!: “Brace yourself! If we take in what the Holy Father is saying in his Theology of the Body, we will never view ourselves, view others, view the Church, the Sacraments, grace, God, heaven, marriage, the celibate vocation...we will never view the world the same way again.”
Here is a short catalog of his main points:
suggesting that a man and woman bless their genitals before making love;
blessing the ovaries of women in his classes;
advising young men in college and the seminary to look at their naked bodies in the mirror daily in order to overcome shame;
using phallic symbolism to describe the Easter candle;
criticizing “flat-chested” images of Mary in art while encouraging Catholics to “rediscover Mary’s ... abundant breasts” (Crisis, March 2002);
referring to the “bloodied membrane” of the placenta as a "tabernacle" (Colorado Catholic Herald, 12/22/06);
stating that, while “there are some important health and aesthetic considerations that can’t be overlooked,” “there's nothing inherently wrong with anal penetration as foreplay to normal intercourse," (Good News About Sex and Marriage, 1st ed., emphasis in original), though qualifying this in the revised edition and stressing the subjective dangers of lust in such activity;
and, on Nightline, praising Hugh Hefner for helping rescue sex from prudish Victorian attitudes, saying that there are “very profound historical connections between Hefner and John Paul II,” while emphasizing that John Paul II took the sexual revolution further and in the right direction.
The Sexual Life of Priests under the material god of Big Bang
WARSAW (AFP) — Polish Friar Ksawery Knotz has been dubbed the high priest of Catholic Kama Sutra, but he says that by giving married couples tips on how to practice divine sex he is simply doing God's work."I certainly encourage married couples to pray for a good and happy sex life -- it's a way for them to become closer to God," the 43-year-old Roman Catholic monk told AFP. At first people are usually slightly shocked but at the same time happily surprised," says Knotz, who like all Catholic clergy has taken a vow of celibacy.Knotz has held retreats with more than 3,000 devoutly Roman Catholic couples in Poland since 2000, with the tacit blessing of church superiors ... and an approving nod from secular therapists. This priest is following simliar lines as to the book Holy Sex by Dr. Gregory Popcak.. "At first people are usually slightly shocked but at the same time happily surprised," says Knotz, who like all Catholic clergy has taken a vow of celibacy.
Marco Politi, Vatican correspondent for “La Repubblica, in his book La Confesione (2001) disclosed a network of gay priests throughout Italy. Rev. Andrew M. Greeley wrote in 1989: “Blatantly active homosexual priests are appointed; transferred and promoted…National networks of active homosexual priests are tolerated. Pedophiles are reassigned.” Knotz has held retreats with more than 3,000 devoutly Roman Catholic couples in Poland since 2000, with the tacit blessing of church superiors ... and an approving nod from secular therapists. Couples are so eager to attend that his weekend and six-day workshops are booked solid for the next year."If you believe in God, then you believe God is involved in life, in love, marriage and in sex and sexuality -- it seems natural to talk about sex to remove taboos and the label of sinfulness," says the monk, who resides in a monastery of the Order of Friars Minor Capuchin in Stalowa Wola, southern Poland.
Decoding John Paul II's Theology of the Body
According to common definition Theology is the study of God, His nature, and attributes and His relations with man and the universe. The strange expression Theology of the Body fits perfectly into the system of thought in which Spirit and Matter are two aspects of the same reality. The Pythagorean dogma proclaiming that extended physical bodies are composed of nonextended mathematical point was inspired by the Hindu god (puru) expanding into infinity, like Dionysus. Zeno argued that everything in the universe is both infinitely large and has no size at all. The infinite divisibility of any physical body regardless of size means that it is composed of an infinite number of elements and thus is infinitely large. On the other hand, the body has no size at all because no number of nonextended units can produce an extended body. Influenced by Zeno's speculations Lenin, nearly hundred years ago, said in his book Materialism and Empiriocriticism that “the electron is as inexhaustible as the atom, nature is infinite…”
In Laws Plato also embraced a soul or souls as the cause of various phenomena:
“Now consider all the stars and the moon and the years and the months and all the seasons: what can we do except repeat the same story? A soul or souls ... have been shown to be the cause of all these phenomena, and whether it is by their living presence in matter ... or by some other means, we shall insist that these souls are gods. Can anybody admit all this and still put up with people who deny that 'everything is full of gods'?”
Hylozoism is the doctrine according to which all matter possesses life. It is a poetical view of the world. We should therefore not be surprised that the first school of philosophers in Greece, the Ionians, conceived of the universe as animated throughout and full of gods: empsychon kai daimonon plere (Diog. Laer., I,27). In the Renaissance, Bernardino Telesio, Paracelsus, Cardano, and G. Bruno revived the doctrine of hylozoism. The latter, for example, held a form of Christian pantheism. God is the source, cause, medium, and end of all things, and therefore all things are participatory in the ongoing Godhead. Anaximander could regard the heavenly bodies as blessed Gods, Xenophanes could ascribe omnipotence and omniscience to the material world ( The Biblical Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil stands for this philosophical dogma). Empedocles could represent love and strife as “elementary bodies” - all this in explaining how “pure reason could have been identified with pure space” by Parmenides and Anaxagoras. The same philosophy is behind the worship of God under the symbol of phallus. In conformity with the logic of his philosophy, penis, vagina, rectum and wastes and everything else are full of gods. And so are animals. And the same pagan philosophy inspired the postulate of pan-sexuality proclaimed by the father of the Sex and Drugs Revolution of the 1960s.
In the time period of pedophile scandals rocking the Catholic Church it will be instructive to remind of a 1985 “New York Native” interview with Joseph Sonnabend (“leading AIDS doctor”). “The rectum”, Sonnabend said, “is a sexual organ, and it deserves the respect a penis gets and a vagina gets.” Anal intercourse has been the central activity for gay men and for some women for all of history. The “leading AIDS doctor” did not know that the people of Katmandu suffer from chronic intestinal parasites caused by drinking water contaminated with fecal matter. “Versatile” anal sex and new behaviors such as analingus, or rimming facilitated the spread of otherwise difficult-to-transmit microbes. Gay men created almost laboratory conditions both to amplify STDs and then to spread these diseases throughout the world. And all these facts prove that the Bible is, indeed the God inspired Book of Books. What a shame that it is a Pope who wants to exile this Book from the memory of mankind! We already know that he will fail! Gay sex breaks every rule of decent hygiene; it is chemical and biological warfare on human societies.
The Greek sexual revolution was confronted by the Biblical commandment, Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down hereto: it is confusion. Lev 18:22, 23 and Dt. 23:17-18 refer to the Canaanite practice of ritual prostitution; the “price of dog” was the bounty paid to male prostitutes who allowed themselves to be sodmized, dog-fashion, by patrons of the temple. In the gay magazine “Advocate” (issue 710, 6/25/1996) in which the most pro-gay US President B. Clinton was interviewed, an ad showed a dog licking his master’s face and the caption promoted canine love as follows: “Dogs lick their genitals an average of four times a day”… Because, as a gay activist observed: “Queer Christians must also re-envision themselves as God’s lovers and discover a love relation with other species and with the universe itself. They need to become partners in their world with other species and learn to relate to them as friends and lovers. Because, as Pytagoras proclaimed, “Animals share with us the privilege of having a soul “(Cp. The myth of Zeus-swan and Leda).
The changing face of priesthood reflects the same tendency, which shaped the Nazi attitude toward the Jews. The gay priesthood will do everything possible to obliterate the Bible and its negative teaching about their “disorder” (John Paul II’s definition). You see, in the vision of that Pope humanity was supposed to be led to “Heaven” by disordered (deranged) minority. Le me remind here that Germany under Hitler showed early evidence of a political party made up of homosexuals; the Nazi party was a party of sex perverts. Together with pagan religion they inherited the most dangerous sexual practices.
Let me quote here a short passage from Tatian's Address to the Greeks: “The Greeks consider intercourse with a mother as unlawful, but this practice is esteemed most becoming by the Persian Magi; pederasty is condemned by the Barbarians, but by Romans, who endeavor to collect herds of boys like grazing horses, it is honored with certain privileges.”
To Finish Them off
The Scientific logic for a new Holocaust goes like that, The Jews who insist on Jewish identity are high on the list of those who must be eliminated because human evolution is on hold until the Jews disappear as a group, especially in a separate Jewish state). Only when the Jewish race has been dissoluted in the big crunch i.e. when it has been breathed in by Brahma they would be breathed out in the next expansionary process and then the problem of their separation together with their old-age attachment to the national territory will disappear. When Jews forget that they are Jews, we shall see very different world (Alice Bailey, The Destiny of Nations, p. 34-35) J. Carter updated A. Bailey's terminology in his book Palestine, Peace not Apartheid. One could say, New Agers are real fanatics of the holocaust process aka peace process.
Big Bang and the Palestine First Policy
In order to better grasp the religious motivation of this international policy we have to look closer t a political and religious movement which according to Hannah Newman seeks to unite the world under the guidance of non-human spirits, in the process of singling out Judaism – and eventually the Jewish people for destruction (www.lermant.com/rainbow-swaztika/naA.htm)
According to the Programme aka The Plan of this religion, published in 1975 the Jewish people whether they know it or not, are a dysfunctional segment of humanity. Their rehabilitation must begin by eliminating the religion which gave them these delusions – a religion so powerful that it unfortunately has infected other religions and peoples with a belief in the One God as revealed to Israel. Part of New Age “transformation of society involves spreading disinformation about the Jewish religion.Every war in the Middle East is an opportunity to castigate Israeli soldiers as war criminals and congenital murderers. Truth is irrelevant to the art of molding public opinion in an Entity War (as New Agers and UN leader Robert Muller described it. The goal behind the delegitimiztion of this religion is to remove its influence from other spiritual systems (especially from Christianity, the daughter religion of Judaism and the most corrupted by it. As for Jews who refuse to give up their identity delusion, the Plan has a final solution. For New Agers any kind of Jewish identity will be considered religious obstacle to human evolution, a matter to be resolved in the planned global. purge.

The Aryan Paradigm Shift

Protocols of the Society of the Elect
All scientific Research is biased from the beginning otherwise
research could not have been possible (Marc Bloch).
Certain Sophists argued that nature means the survival of the fittest; by making laws civilization only tries to soften the struggle to which man by nature is fitted. Real justice is the rule of the stronger. The conventional justice of a given society is simply the means whereby those who are unfitted to survive can survive. This philosophy is good for Superpowers.
Empedocles argued that for a theory of natural selection on the basis of chance. The survival of the fittest means that those who happen to be more fit for survive; the less fit perish. Aristotle called chance a fifth cause. Other philosophers said it was something divine. According to Aristotle, chance (to automaton in Greek) is the interruption of a process which produces an unusual result. Something interrupts the natural chain of causation, when a two-headed baby, for example, is born. In this example, chance is understood as an occurrence which has no purpose in itself. Chance is an event which deflects things from their proper end, and contributes nothing to some other end. Aristotle thinks that the question so important that he devotes the rest of Book II to an inquiry of what chance is, and its relation to natural necessity.
The essential nature of a natural body can only be fully understood in terms of its purpose, that is, in terms of the function it is supposed to perform. Form as the aim of a natural process is a distinct factor in causation. Purpose is ultimate 'because' of natural change. Aristotle argues that nature must have a purpose. Order and conformity to type imply purpose. All causation is directed toward an end and the conformity to type imply purpose. All causation is directed toward an end and the end of each natural body predetermines the form and the material of that body. When nature fulfills her purpose, man begets man and nothing else. The natural end of anything is to conform to its type, to become what it is designed to be. If nature has a purpose, as it does in Aristotle's system, there must be some explanation which goes beyond the purely natural world to account for that purpose.
At the Sources of the British Middle-East Policy
In his magisterial two-volume work Modern Egypt, Lord Cromer argued that the ‘Oriental’, meaning Semites, was irredeemably childish and the diametrical opposite of ‘us’: “Sir Alfred Lyall once said to me: ‘Accuracy is abhorrent to the Oriental mind. Every Anglo-Indian school always remembers that maxim.’ Want of accuracy, which easily degenerates into untruthfulness, is in fact the main characteristic of the Oriental mind. The European is a close reasoner; his statements of fact are devoid of any ambiguity; he is a natural logician, albeit he may not have studied logic; he is by nature skeptical and requires proof before he can accept the truth of any proposition; his trained intelligence works like a piece of mechanism. The mind of the Oriental, on the other hand, like his picturesque streets, is eminently wanting in symmetry. His reasoning is of the most slipshod description. Although the ancient Arabs acquired in a somewhat higher degree the science of dialectics, their descendants are singularly deficient in the logical faculty. They are often incapable of drawing the most obvious conclusions from any simple premises of which they may admit the truth.” (Quoted in Edward W. Said, Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient New York and London, 1985. p.38)
In 1798 Napoleon sailed to Egypt, accompanied by scores of Orientalists from his Institut d’Egypte. At Alexandria he addressed the Egyptian crowd with the claim: “Nous sommes les vrais musulmans.” Then he had sixty sheikhs of al-Azhar, the great mosque in Cairo, brought with full military honours into his quarters. He carefully praised the prophet, discussed with them Voltiare’s Mahomet and seems to have held his own with the learned ulema. (K. Armstrong, Muhammad, p.38)
What 'Science' meant for the early Apostles of Aryanism
The influential French philologist E. Renan attempted a “scientific” explanation for new racist and imperialist myths. He argued that Hebrew and Arabic were degraded languages, deviations from the Aryan tradition, which had become irredeemably flawed. These Semitic tongues could be studied only as an example of arrested development and lacked the progressive character of ‘our’ linguistic systems. That was why Jews and Arabs were both ‘une combinaison inferieure de la nature humaine: “One sees that in all things the Semitic race appears to us to be an incomplete race by virtue of its simplicity. This race – if I dare use the analogy – is to the Indo-European family what a pencil sketch is to a painting; it lacks that variety, that amplitude, that abundance of life which is the condition of perfectibility. Like those individuals who possess so little fecundity that, after a gracious childhood, they attain only the most mediocre virility, the Semitic nations experienced their fullest flowering in their first age.” Renan inspired this passage in A. Hitler's Mein Kampf: “…What we see before us of human culture today, the results of art, science, and techniques, is almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan.” (…) “The Jew forms the strongest contrast to the Aryan.’’(…) “The Jewish person, with all its apparent intellectual qualities, is nevertheless without any true culture, especially without a culture of its own. For the sham culture which the Jew possesses today is the property of other peoples, and is mostly spoiled in his hands. When judging Jewry in its attitude towards the question of human culture, one has to keep before one’s eyes as an essential characteristic that there never has been and consequently that today also there is no Jewish art; that above all the two queens of all arts, architecture and music, owe nothing original to Jewry. What he achieves in the field of art is either bowdlerization or intellectual theft. With this, the Jew lacks those qualities which distinguish creatively and, with it, culturally blessed races.’’
An Excerpt from a Palestinian History Textbook:
“The Philistines, who came from Crete and Asia Minor, merged with the Canaanites, who originated from the Arabian peninsula, and gave the land is name, Falastin. The Jebusites, a Canaanite people, are the ancestors of the Palestinians. Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but a “believer in one God.” The twelve sons of Jacob fled to Egypt, interbred with the Egyptians there and became numerous. Moses and his followers wandered in the desert; they were not endowed with any scientific or artistic talents and made no cultural achievements whatsoever…” No wonder that the Palestinian Queen is living with her daughter in Paris.
At the Sources of the New Age World Government,
or Federal Imperialism
Cecil Rhodes (1853-1902) envisioned a Federal Imperialism through which Anglo-American elites would direct the world toward "freedom," which they considered the prime British ideal. The British Commonwealth was an early form of this pattern of world government. An early colleague of Rhodes (whose trust funds Rhodes scholarships) was Sir Alfred Milner (1854-1925), one of the early members of the "Society of the Elect" formed by Rhodes about 1885. It would be "a secret society patterned on the Jesuits." As described in Rhodes's first will (1877), the goals were "the extension of British rule throughout the world; perfecting a system of emigration from the United Kingdom and colonization of all lands... (They can even settle in the West Bank) the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of a British Empire; the consolidation of the Empire... to make war impossible and promote the best interests of humanity." It was the wife of a Rhodes Scholar who broke the taboo of the US policy and demanded establishment of a Palestinian state.The behavior of the United Nations shows what has come of these goals in the past century. In the House of Lords on June 27, 1923, a year after the British severed the Gilead from the Jewish National Home (Milner termed this, "the Balfour Declaration as we have interpreted it"), Lord Milner emphasized that there was "plenty of room" west of the Jordan "for several millions" of immigrants. He added that he "had always been a strong supporter of the pro-Arab policy... and the independence of the Arab states, which they owe to us and which they can only maintain with our help I look forward to an Arab Federation." American and British soldiers are struggling in a chaotic semi-war even today for that federation.(Cp. the donors' countries subsidizing Abbas and Haniyah's regimes).They are too childish to take care of their people.
Al Qaida vs. the Quartet
Milner added that "the Arab would make a great mistake to claim Palestine [sic] as a part of the Arab Federation...." He believed it could be a majority Jewish area, part of the Commonwealth, "but must never become a Jewish state." In the Jihadi view, expressed by bin Laden, Zawahiri, and many radical clerics such as Qardawi, Palestine is one issue among many in the greater confrontation with the kuffar (infidels). It may be the main issue, especially to Palestinian Islamists, but not the single jihadi issue worldwide. For whereas the PLO's first objective is to establish a Palestinian state on as much land as possible, al Qaeda's agenda in Palestine is to dismantle Israel, then merge the “province” of Palestine into the greater caliphate. In short, the jihadis are not nationalists, but internationalists, Islamists. Such nuances are crucial in the War of Ideas. (Walid Phares. THE WAR OF IDEAS. Jihad Against Democracy.Palgrave. 2007)
Let me remind in this context revealing words of US President G.H. Bush from his speech to the Ukrainian parliament:
After the sessions with Gorbachev were over, Bush went to , the capital of Ukraine, where he rejected a private meeting with Ivan Drach, the leader of the Rukh, the main opposition movement. In the Ukrainian capital on August 1, “Chicken ” Bush made his infamous speech in which he warned about the dangers inherent in nationalism.
And then, the crowning insult to the Ukrainians, who had been denied their nationhood for centuries: “…freedom is not the same as independence. Americans will not support those who seek in order to replace a far-off tyranny with a local despotism. (www.tarpley.net/bush24.htm).
Lord Milner's protege, John Dove (1872-1934), went from New College Oxford to work for the growing British colony in South Africa, then to Australia and back to London, traveling extensively in Europe on financial concerns. Professor Carroll Quigley, who wrote extensively on this group and their influence and control of journals, mass media, academia and government, (Don't expect professors Mersheimer and Walt to write a book about the British Lobby) noted that "the British upper classes tended to have only a remote feeling about anti-Semitism," but that they personally liked the Arabs - who also preferred leisure and hunting to "busy, bustling activity" (that is, productivity).
The New Age is a political/religious movement which seeks to unite the world under the guidance of non-human spirits, in the process singling the Jewish people and Judaism for destruction. It is so popular that it is quickly becoming the standard for social political and religious acceptability; premises of New Age are most clearly mapped out in a religious society called 'Theosophy', founded 1875 by Rusian-born countess Helena von Hahn-Blavatsky, with family ties to Czar's dynasty. Hitler kept a copy of Blavatsky's 'The Secret Doctrine' by his bedside, ever since being introduced to its teachings by Dietrich Eckart and Karl Haushofer. (see Adolf Hitler, The Occult Messiah, Gerald Suster, 1981).
theunjustmedia.com/Freemasons/The%20six%20poi...
"Theosophy" is the speculative philosophical approach to the knowledge of all things that was first made famous in the 3rd century of the common era in Alexandria in Egypt, and of which the primary purpose, beyond the acquisition of knowledge, was to attempt to fend off the conquest of the world by ignorance and superstition, by which I mean to describe the Judeo-Christian world view.
The primary goal of the New Agers is the delegitimiztion of Jewish religion and removal of its influence from other spiritual systems (especially from Christianity,and Islam the daughter religions of Judaism) As for Jews who refuse to give up their identity delusion, the Plan has a final solution. For New Agers any kind of Jewish identity will be considered religious obstacle to human evolution, a matter to be resolved in the planned GlobalPurge. Because, as the Semites, they are so childish!
Let me remind here that the 1877 manuscript Isis Unveiled by Madame Blavatsky became the pseudo-religious basis of the so-called Isis Cult which called for the British aristocracy to organize itself into an Isis priesthood which would ultimately liberate the world from the ignorance and superstition of the Judeo-Christian world view.
Transforming the British into the Race of the Aryan Supermen
Until 1836 the English public had never heard of Andrew Crosse. By the end of 1837 he was reviled from one end of England to the other. He was an atheist, a blasphemer, “a reviler of our holy religion”, “a disturber of the peace of families”, a man who had presumptuously attempted to rival the God that made him.
: www.rexresearch.com/crosse/crosse.htm
He was accused of having attempted to create living creatures, by an electrical process, from dead matter. Very little of that work, or of the original experiments, has survived. Only two short paper written by Crosse in 1837 are extant: one in the Transactions of the London Electrical Society (for 1838) and the other in the Annals of Electricity (Oct. 1836-Oct. 1837). In addition, his wife's Memorials of Andrew Crosse (1857) reproduced the substance of the former paper. Here is a short summary of these sources.
In the year 1837 Crosse was making certain experiments upon the artificial formation of crystals by means of weak and long-continued electric currents. The insect (acari) first appeared in the course of an attempt to make crystals of silica by allowing a suitable fluid medium to seep through a piece of porous stone (oxide of iron, from Vesuvius) kept electrified by means of battery. The fluid used was a mixture of hydrochloric acid and a solution of silicate of potash.
“On the 26th day from the commencement of this experiment the appearances assumed the form of a perfect insect, standing erect on a few bristles which formed its tail. In the course of a few weeks about a hundred of them made their appearance on the stone...In a later experiment, Crosse succeeded in producing an acarus in a closed and airtight glass retort filled with an electrified solution, one wire being led in through the all of the retort and the other through a cup of mercury at its beak. The solution was a sillicate one, prepared as for the first experiment, and was put in hot. On connecting up the battery:
“An electric action commenced; oxygen and hydrogen gases were liberated; the volume of atmospheric air was soon expelled. Every care had been taken to avoid atmospheric contact and admittance of extraneous matter, and the retort itself had previously been washed with hot alcohol...
“I discovered no sign of incipient animal formation until on the 140th day, when I plainly distinguished one acarus actively crawling about within the bulb of the retort.” Let me add here that in those days, i.e. When Blavatsky was propagating her ideas, electricity was considered the very essence and origin of life itself. According to Soviet poet Maiakovsky, the soul is nothing but “steam, compressed air, and electricity.” Lenin taught: Communism= Socialism+Electricity.
Henry Kunrath, the greatest of the alchemists and Rosicrucians of the middle ages, has shown spirit in man, as in every atom – as a bright flame enclosed within a more or less transparent globule – which he called soul.
It is interesting to note that at the height of the Crosse furore (1837) no less an authority than Faraday stated, in a paper read at the Royal Institution, that similar appearances had presented themselves in the course of his own electrical experiments, but that he was doubtful whether they should be regarded as a case of production or revivification..
In the opinion of Dr. A.C. Oudemans of Arnhem, an authority upon acari, expressed in 1934, Crosse's were quite certainly the common Glycophagus domesticus, which is very tenacious of life and capable of getting into tins which appear to be hermetically sealed. (Rupert T. Gould Crosse's Acari in his book Oddities. A Book of Unexplained facts. 1965)
Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's book Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus published in 1818 tells the story of a monster that has been created from parts of dead bodies by a scientist named Count Frankenstein. The story was inspired by the 5th c. Greek philosopher Empedocles who thought that individual organisms arose from pre-existing parts, such as heads, arms, and legs, which were brought together by chance.. In the 6th c. B.C. The Greek philosopher Anaximander taught that all forms of life arose from mud.
The worm of today is the God of tomorrow. (Swami Vivekananda)
Every form of life is made up of a certain grade of matter expressing a certain degree of intelligence or consciousness, and the connecting link between the two is the vital force of Fohat. It links spirit and matter, subject to object, as explained in the First Fundamental Proposition of The Secret Doctrine. It is the "bridge" by which the Eternal Thought in the Eternal Mind is collectivized as universal Nature.
The way winds up-hill all the way, from the valley of mire to summits of glorious light Nirvanic, and it is necessary to use one's energy in the cultivation of virtues. One of the paramitas is "VIRYA, the dauntless energy that fights its way to the Supernal TRUTH, out of the mire of lies terrestrial." This will transform man into a god, enabling him not only to enjoy Nirvanic peace and bliss, but also to use his energy on all planes to elevate his fellow pilgrims and relieve their suffering. Thus, to propel life from the unmanifested to manifestation, from the atom to man and man to god, is the work of Fohat, the great Transformer, at first through natural impulse and then through the self-conscious effort of man. (Fohat the Great Transformer THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT, March 1964). In early England Fohat was called goddess Mutability). Imagine Fohat on a electric chair!
In a painting of the descent from the cross in the church of Rennes-les-Bains, the crown of thorns has been given the appearance of a gigantic spider. The spider belongs to the mythological lore of the Brahmins who assert, that the world arose from the infinite spider, who spun the whole complicated mass from his bowels, and annihilates afterwards the whole or any part of it, by absorbing it again (Cp. expansion and contraction of Big Bang), and resolving it into his own essence.
In the 19th Century we have also a Russian version of Aryanization of Christianity, which inspires the present day missionary efforts of the New Agers among the Israelis. In 1894, the Russian war correspondent Nicolas Notovich initiated something, which could be called the Russian Israelitism i.e. a political movement rivaling the British claims to the Biblical Holy Land. In that year Notovich published a book in French La vie inconnue de Jesus Christ (The Unknown Life of Jesus Christ) which referred to a sensational discovery that Notovich pretended to have made. In the monastery of Hemis close to Leh, the capital of the district of Ladakh he learned that the monastery was in the possession of scrolls inscribed with the Life of Saint Issa (the Tibetan form of the name of Jesus). He learned that Jesus had wandered to India and to Tibet as a young man before he began his work in Galilee and Judea. According to the story, Jesus had met Jains, Brahmins, and Buddhists; he learned Pali and had studied the sacred writings of the Buddhists until he returned again to the West. On his way back, Jesus preached to the Zoroastrians in Persia, and then he began his work in Judea (Jesus never uttered the name Palestine, or West Bank for that matter.). The political unity called Quartet makes sense in this context.
Finding Newton's and Darwin's God
In the Pipes of Pan, a proposed Scholium to the Principia Mathematica of 1687 Newton rewrote the myth of Pythagoras claiming that the inverse-square law of gravitation had been known to the earliest sages. The same law had been discovered, Newton wrote, between a string's length and its tension for a given musical pitch, before it was applied to the heavens where it was observed by Shiva Nataraja, Apollo Musagetes and all other solar deities.
Newton's dilemma behind the inverse square law of gravitation is understandable in the context of the myth of Shiva. With drum and dance, he represents the world's perpetual unfolding or evolution. The drum in Hindu myth is an agency of cosmic creation*, and dancing is one of the many aspects of Shiva's essence. Dance produced rhythm and that rhythm, Newton thought, must have been observed in his 'scientific” law of gravitation. Similarly, the formulation “cube roots of squares” used in Opticks was known from Kepler's Third Law, deduced again in Principia, to show the average distance of a planet from the sun is proportional to a cube root of the square of the planet's period of revolution. In his Harmony of the World (1619) Kepler calculated from the greatest and the slowest speed of each planet the “divine” musical scales of the planets.
*In an American Christmas carol titled The Little Drummer a little boy brings to new-born baby Jesus the only thing he possessed – his drum. This song, undoubtedly, inspired by the Shivaite mythology turns Jewish Jesus into an avatar of the Aryan god portrayed in American iconography as a blond, blue-eyed Aryan, and not a dark-skinned, Oriental Jesus. In other words the Little Drummer is an American version of Notovich's Jesus raised a lama in Tibet
Newton's Pipes of Pan will return in Darwin's ritual because heliocentrism and evolutionism always went hand in hand. In music the Greeks distinguished: rhythms, mutations, and melopoeia. According to Douland to a Musitian (1609) “Mutation is the putting of one concord for another in the same key. According to The New Age Dictionary. A Guide to Planetary Family Consciousness. Ed. By Alex Jack. (Japan Publications, Inc. 1990), Charles Darwin was “evolutionist who played a bassoon for his plants.” The New Age Magic of Findhorn describes plenty of such mutations inspiring concerts. One of them is 40-pound cabbages, which reminds of the Soviet biologist Michurin who allegedly got a mutation of 10-pound apples. Problem was that the branches were breaking…
This is how English paper describes the astounding trick of
plant-growth, as performed by Indian jugglers:
"An empty flower-pot was now placed upon the floor by the juggler, who requested that his comrades might be allowed to bring up some garden mould from the little plot of ground below. Permission being accorded, the man went, and in two minutes returned with a small quantity of fresh earth tied up in a corner of his chudder, which was deposited in the flower-pot and lightly pressed down. Taking from his basket a dry mango-stone, and handing it round to the company that they might examine it, and satisfy themselves that it was really what it seemed to be, the juggler scooped out a little earth from the center of the flower-pot and placed the stone in the cavity. He then turned the earth lightly over it, and, having poured a little water over the surface, shut the flower-pot out of view by means of a sheet thrown over a small triangle. And now, amid a full chorus of voices and rat-tat-tat accompaniment of the tabor, the stone germinated; presently a section of the cloth was drawn aside, and gave to view the tender shoot, characterized by two long leaves of a blackish-brown color. The cloth was readjusted, and the incantation resumed. Not long was it, however, before the cloth was a second time drawn aside, and it was then seen that the two first leaves had given place to several green ones, and that the plant now stood nine or ten inches high. A third time, and the foliage was much thicker, the sapling being about thirteen to fourteen inches in height. A fourth time, and the little miniature tree, now about eighteen inches in height, had ten or twelve mangoes about the size of walnuts hanging about its branches. Finally, after the lapse of three or four minutes, the cloth was altogether removed, and the fruit, having the perfection of size, though not of maturity, was plucked and handed to the spectators, and, on being tasted, was found to be approaching ripeness, being sweetly acid." Quoted by (H.P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, vol. I, chap. 5) Recall Edward Norton doing the same trick in a Hollywood movie.
Music of a fakir’s flute drew up the akasa or intangible life-principle, the astral and celestial lights combined together, in a concentrated current through the plant, and by keeping up an unintermitted flow for the requisite space of time, the life-principle of the plant built up cell after cell, layer after layer, until the work was done. The will of the fakir-conjurer forms an invisible but yet, to it, perfectly objective matrix, in which the vegetable matter is caused to deposit itself and assume the fixed shape. So mutations don’t happen by chance, after all. They are created by the god Pan’s music even if Darwin himself plagiarized this music! The will creates, for the will in motion is force, and force produces matter. This philosophy is also behind the title of the biographical film about Hitler produced by Leni Riefenstahl Triumph des Willens (Triumph of the Will).
You see, the truly scientific, Darwinian agriculture doesn't need any fertilizers; Hindu jugglers with tabors will do the trick like in the Findhorn community. Let's install thousands of speakers in farms across the world and hunger will finally be eliminated. Recall the so-called Green Revolution in India which withered away.
The exceptional masterpiece of Madhubani portrays the Divine-trayi of Indian Gods - Shiva, Vishnu and Brahma, along with Shiva's sons, the six headed Karttikeya and the elephant headed Ganesha. Besides Vishnu's primeval form he is also present in his incarnated form as Krishna. The robust and fully evolved form of Lord Shiva is engaged in dance whereas Vishnu is accompanying him on 'mradanga', the long drum. With drum and dance, he represents the world's perpetual unfolding or evolution. The drum in Hindu myth is an agency of cosmic creation.
So alike in Kosmos and in man is this power of Sound - Sound without which form cannot be, Sound which is the builder of form, which generates form, every Sound having its own form, and every Sound being of this triple character, that it generates form, that it upholds form, that it destroys form. Thus, once again, the Trimurti appears, the Crea­tor, the Preserver, the Destroyer; they are all One in different aspects, for the Divine is One, what­ever the form of Its manifestation. (...)
Take, for instance, an ordinary drum, so that in the parchment head of this drum you have a vibrating surface. If you take the bow with which you throw the strings of a violin into vibration, and draw this bow across the edge of the parchment, then a note is given out - a note which depends of course on the ten­sion in the parchment and various other matters which are not important to us. That is simple enough; but it was thought desirable to try to dis­cover what happened when the note was given out; and in order that that which is invisible might be made visible, sand was lightly scattered over the surface of the drum; then the bow was drawn across the edge of the circle of the drum, and this experiment was done over and over again at every point in this circle which was the circumference of the drum. Let me say in passing that European Science is admirable in its patience, in the way in which it repeats over and over again until it gets the fact; in that it is worthy of our admiration, for in that fashion only can these phenomenal facts be discovered. In every portion of the circumfer­ence that was experimented upon, it was found that as the bow was drawn across, the sand was thrown up in the air, but it was also found that when it came back it did not fall evenly over the surface, but formed a geometrical figure. So that the sand spread over the parchment was by sound compelled to assume definite geometrical shapes, different as the notes were changed in character by bowing different points in the circumference. As different intervals in the circumference gave out different harmonics of the fundamental note, it was found different shapes were produced; that at first, touching it at a particular point, you will only get the drum divided into four, because that is the fun­damental note given out by the parchment vibrat­ing as a whole. When you make it vibrate in harmonics you have geometrical shapes of a far more elaborate character. And following out these investigations of harmonics - as they were called­ - we discover that in every note that is sounded, you have not got a single sound but a very com­plex sound that can be divided and subdivided. This is a gospel according to Plato who said that god is eternally geometrizing. Galileo's Book of Nature is also written with geometrical figures, like Cubist paintings.(Annie Besant, Building of the Cosmos. London: Theosophical Publishing Society. 1894) A. Besant is recognized as a midwife of the New Age under the aegis of the United Nations.
www.davetheartist.com/cubism_fortyone.html
No doubt, the Hindu Mythology was the inspiration for Ch. Darwin's evolutionism. Prof. Kenneth R. Miller, aware of Pope John Paul II's high praise of evolutionism, in his book FINDING DARWIN’S GOD. A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution (Cliff Street Books 1999) tried to reconcile Darwinism with his Catholic faith. He should try to reconcile it rather with John Paul II's Aryan Neo-Catholicism as presented in Christopher West's shows based on John Paul's Theology of the Body which reconciles this particular Catholicism with phallic Islam of Al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem.
Well, a certain Mr. B.G. McKenzie observed during the Scopes Trial: “They are seeking to reconcile it, if your honor please, and come right along and prove by the mouth of their scientist that when he said God created man in His own image, in His own image created He him out of the ground and blew into him the breath of life, and he became as a living creature they want to put words into God’s mouth, and have Him to say that He issued some sort of protoplasm, or soft dish rag, and put it in the ocean and said, “Old boy, if you wait around about 6,000 years, I will make something out of you.”
And the Isis Priesthood Was Made Flesh
Well, Sir William Crookes, Physicist, chemist and a President of Royal Society, claimed to have seen materialized spirit forms walking and talking during séances He invited the two secretaries of the Royal Society, Professor Stokes and Sharpey, to visit his home to witness the phenomena for themselves – an invitation which neither of them accepted. Sir Crookes himself materialized a spirit whom he named Katie King and described her in such words:
"Round her she made an atmosphere of life;The very air seemed lighter from her eyes;They were so soft and beautiful and rifeWith all we can imagine of the skies;Her overpowering presence makes you feelIt would not be idolatry to kneel!"
(See his pamphlet The Last of Katie King, p. 112)
Tyndall in his Fragments of Science observed: “The world will have a religion of some kind, even though it should fly for it to the intellectual whoredom of Spiritulism,” or should I say of New Age. The “whoredom of Spiritualism” became A. Huxley's Sex and Drugs Revolution accompanied by Beatles' mantras Hail Krishna!
But wait, there is more. Ch. Darwin, writing to Sir Francis Galton on 23 Jan. 1872, said: “Have you seen Mr. Crookes? I hope to heaven you have, as I for one should feel entire confidence in your conclusion! In 1874 after reading Crookes’s Notes of an Enquiry into the Phenomena Called Spiritual, Darwin remarked in a letter to Lady Derby, “If you had called here after I had read the article you would have found me a much perplexed man. Cannot disbelieve Mr.Crookes’s statements, nor can believe his results!” Galton did indeed call in Crookes, and he was soon able to report to Darwin, in a letter dated March 28, 1872: “Crookes is working deliberately and well.” Three weeks later Galton wrote: “Crookes, I am sure so far as it is just for me to give an opinion, is thoroughly scientific in his procedure. I am convinced; the affair is no matter of vulgar legerdemain.” And that's what Science, according to Isis Priesthood, is.
Crookes’s records of his experiments fall far short (as he himself admitted) of the standards the subject demanded. His scientific achievements may have engendered a certain assumption of omnipotence, for in 1871 he was able to say without embarrassment: “Others have gone so far as to question my veracity: “Mr. Crookes must get better witnesses before he can be believed!” Accustomed as I am to have my word believed without witness, this is an argument which I cannot condescend to answer.” (Man, Myth, Magic, v. 4, p547n). That’s how a President of the Royal Society ‘s mind works. One thing, however, remains to be explained, we don’t know if Sir Crookes danced with Katie King and, if he cared to weigh her with Colonel Olcott’s spring balance. Keep in mind that, according to the Fifth Gospel of Newton, gravity is the spiritual body of Jesus Christ... Will somebody materialize Jesus Christ, or John Paul II, please?
Roman Pytel, Ph.D. poles4israel, www.roman pytel.blogspot.com 07/17/09