The famous German scientist Alexander von Humbold's declared in private: “I have known, too, for a long time, that we have no arguments for the Copernican system, but I shall never dare to be the first to attack it. Don't rush into the wasp's nest. You will bring upon yourself the scorn of the thoughtless multitude. If once a famous astronomer arises against the present conception, I will communicate too, my observations; but to come forth as the first against opinions which the world has become fond of – I don't feel the courage.” He knew all too well who was relentlessly promoting Copernicus's helicentriusm and that in this promotion the fake Galileo trial played an important role.
Reading the proceeding of numerous symposia, one is struck by the difference in the speeches of European and Arab parties. The Europeans employ cautious language, admiring and flattering Islam. The Arab faction, on the contrary, adopts the tone of a schoolmaster wielding the stick, confident of the tolerance, humanism and greatness of its civilization, the spiritual and scientific fountainhead of Europe. Keep in mind, the Phallic architecture of Al-Aqsa Mosque foreshadowed Averroes' heliocentrism, embraced by St. Thomas Aquinas and then by Copernicus and the Catholic Europe.
Hitler used the Copernican heliocentrism as the proof of the racial superiority of the Aryans which gave him the right to exterminate “racially impaired Jewish vermin” expressed in the Vatican-inspired slogan Juda verrecke. It came then as no surprise that he found his most loyal collaborator in the person of Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Haj Amin whose clan encompassed the family of the future Nazi terrorist Y. Arafat.
YHWH vs. Arab Science
Since Plato, all heliocentrists use the same deceiving trick: whenever they cannot explain certain phenomena in terms of heliocentric philosophy they revert to geocentric language or intermingle heliocentrism with geocentrism. The following excerpt from Wkipedia (entry: Solstice) is a typical sample of this doubletalk: “A solstice occurs twice a year, whenever Earth's axis tilts the most toward or away from the Sun, causing the Sun to be farthest north or south at noon. The name is derived from Latin sol (sun) and sistere (to stand still), because at the solstice, the Sun stands still in declination, that is, its movement north or south is minimal.
According to the British National Maritime Museum, the solstices are the time when the Sun is at its furthest from the celestial equator and these occur in mid-summer and mid-winter. Incidentally, the British celebrate their midsummer's day on either the 23rd or 24th of June, although their scientists assert that the longest day actually falls on the 21st of June and Wikipedia stresses that “Solstitial celebrations still centre upon 24 June, which is no longer the longest day of the year”.
In geocentrism, we would say: since the month of June the sun travels ever so slightly southward in the ecliptic each day for some six month of the year and each day the daylight becomes shorter. In December the sun halts for a few days in its journey before commencing the slow ascension northward once more for the next six month.
The sun moves in two cycles: 1) it is spiraling downward toward the tropic of Capricorn where the winter solstice occurs and 2) it is spiraling upwards toward the tropic of Cancer where the summer solstice occurs. Amazing thing is that when it reaches these two tropics it stays, for a few days, on the same orbit, or in other words, the sun stands still in declination.
The Inca Festival of the sun (Inti Raymi) marked the winter solstice and a new year in the Andes. One ceremony performed by the Inca priests was the tying of the sun. The ceremony to tie the sun to the stone was to prevent the sun from escaping to the North Pole. In Machu Picchu there is still a large column of stone called an Intihuatana, meaning “hitching post of the sun” or literally for tying the sun. The Roman Church, in order to prevent all critical reflection on Copernicus's book, ordered the Spanish conquistadors to suppress all Inti Festivals, and to destroy all the intihuatana. One was preserved because the Spanish conquest never found Machu Picchu.. The perennial Roman heliocentrism is reflected in the pagan wheel of the year on the surface of St. Peter's Square in front of St. Peter's Church (see www.canadafirst.net/our_heritrage/solstice/). Since 1944, a theatrical representation of the Inti Raymi has been taking place at Sacsayhuaman (one mile from Cusco) on June 24 of each year, attracting thousands of local visitors and tourists.
The main change caused by the Copernican Revolution was the acceptance of the belief that “Science” has disproved the Bible. And thus, the Copernican Revolution began a process of replacing the Bible with “Science” as the new source of Absolute Truth proclaimed especially by the Moscow Pravda. “The geocentric Jew lacks soul” declared the chief Nazi ideologue A. Rosenberg inspired by Teilhard de Chardin, a French Jesuit paleontologist and hoaxer who was mourning his Church’s unwillingness to incorporate what Science had discovered, into its understanding of the world, criticizing especially the “geocentricity” to which she clung psychologically for four hundred years after she had ceased to support it astronomically. E Chardin wrote: “Christianity’s only chance to grow lay in her being born again among the Gentiles because only the Gentiles had retained their pagan taste for the Earth.” Indeed, the Nazis demonstrated their pagan taste for the earth” by hugging it before every battle, exactly like Pope John Paul II did on his every “pilgrimage.”
The Roman historian Pliny observed in his Natural History: “We are so much at the mercy of chance that Chance herself, by whom G-d is proved uncertain, takes the place of G-d”. Like in Ch. Darwin's books. In contradistinction, the Torah stresses: “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecc 3:1) So, G-d designed the solstices for a purpose. Can this purpose be discerned? The answer is a resounding yes. The solstices are the most convincing proof of the truth of the G-d inspired Torah's astronomy. If the sun, having reached the solstitial tropics, reversed its spiral movement without staying on the same orbit for a few days we would not have this formidable argument against the heliohoax.
In order to fully comprehend this problem imagine substituting the speeding earth for the spiraling sun. The dead end arises when you try to explain a few days of the same length in the helioscheme. Because in this scheme the earth moves on the circular orbit of the ecliptic i.e. it moves downward or upward which also means that for half a year the days age growing shorter or on the upward turn – longer. They never stay the same, not on a few consecutive days of the year. In order to explain the solstices in heliocentrism we have to assume that at a certain point of of its travel the earth comes to a sudden stop, or, that its speed goes down from 20 miles per second to 0, and after a few days it suddenly jumps from 0 to 20 miles per second. Apocalyptic consequences of such an assumption for the life on earth are obvious unless you are so blinded by your helioreligion that you reject any rational argument. And besides, such an assumption thrashes the boondoggle of Newton's Principia.
If the earth stands still for a few days it means that after that it has to increase its speed to make up for this delay, but that also means that covering more distance, thanks to the increased speed, would result in disproportionate increase of daylight on the upward travel of the earth and respectively decrease on the downward turn. Keep in mind the difference: the trajectory of the sun in geocentrism is spiral; the trajectory of the earth in the helioscheme is circular or elliptical if you prefer Kepler and Newton to Copernicus and Galileo.
When you introduce the moon into the solstitial equation, you'll have to conclude that the solstitial areas are governed by a totally different set of physical laws that contradict the boondoggle hidden behind the Newton's apple.
The authors who by their tables of date and time of solstices and equinoxes point to the empirically verifiable fact of the “sun” reaching the highest or lowest points in its travel around the earth miss the point, namely that it is the earth that stands still in declination (See, for example, the table of summer and winter solstices set up by the British National Maritime Museum at www.ac.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.3843) . The assertion that the summer solstices are the longest and shortest days of the year, and, that after the solstice, the days begin to get shorter or longer are simply not true. But on such false descriptions the helioboondoggle thrives since centuries.
Let me confront them with astronomical facts that totally destroy these deceptive manipulations. I will use for my presentation a Soviet calendar of the year 1989 because the Soviet astronomers are beyond any suspicion that they might manipulate the astronomical data. Copernicus being highly praised by K. Marx and F. Engels was embraced by them as a patron “saint” of their materialistic, atheistic ideology.
Here is their time of sunrises and sunsets on a few consecutive days in June and December of 1989: on June 20 the sun rose at 4.43 and set at 22.20; on June 21 again, sunrise at 4.43 and sunset at 22.20; on June 22, the same, sunrise at 4.43 and sunset at 22.20 and finally, on June 23 still the same, sunrise at 4.43 and sunset at 22.10. So, in effect we have not one longest day but four. Only on June 24 the sun rose one minute later (at 4.44) and set one minute later (at 22.21). We have the same situation on June 25, which means that we have 6 longest days of 17 h 37' daylight. For four consecutive days the earth stood still in declination, which literally means that it did not move upward on its elliptical trajectory. Then it moved a little bit up to stood again for two days.
In the same year the Soviets had seven shortest days of 6 h 57' daylight between December 18 and 24 although not in the same time frame: on Dec. 18 and 19 the sun rose at 8:58 and set at 15.55; on Dec. 20 and 21 the sun rose at 8.59 and set at 15.56; on Dec. 22 and 23 the sun rose at 9.00 and set at 15.57 and on Dec 24 the sun rose at 9.01 and set 15.58
In other words, in 1989 the earth stood still for 13 days. In helioscheme the earth covers the distance of 1, 728.000 miles per day and night and that means that on the remaining part of its trajectory the earth had to make up for over twenty million miles. Nobody, so far, explained the causes of these sudden stops and jump start accelerations.
In the year 2002 the Poles had only two longest days: on June 20 (sr 4.14- ss 21.01)* and on June 21 (sr 4.14 – ss 21.01). June 22 was one minute shorter. During the winter solstice they had the shortest day on December 21 (sr 7.43 – ss 15.25). But here is a surprise, December 22 was one minute longer (sr 7.43 – ss 15.26) but December 23 was, contrary to the rule, one minute shorter, exactly like the shortest day, although in a different time frame sr 7.44 – ss 15.26). December 24 was one minute longer (sr 7.44 – ss 15.27) but December 25 was again one minute shorter (sr 7.45 – 15.27). The Polish proverb says that it is only on New Year's Day that the daylight is really longer “by a ram's jump” (Na Nowy Rok przybywa dnia na barni skok).
*According to the table set up by the National Maritime Museum the summer solstice in 2002 occurred on 21 June, 13.24
*According to the same source, the winter solstice occurred 22 December, 07.04
Consider in this context the dogmas of Copernicus's contradicted by the results of Kepler's researches.. The Polish Bombastes Furioso aka Sir Lucius O'Trigger hypothesized:
Planets move in perfect circles
Planets move in constant speed
Sun at the center of these orbits
But Kepler showed:
Planets move in ellipses
Planetary speed varies constantly
Sun is not quite at the center of the planetary orbits
Which “heliotruth” do you believe in? Is International Space Station moving in a perfect circle or rather in a perfect ellipse? Does it move in constant speed or rather its speed varies constantly? How do you drink weightless water in zero gravity? How do you get rid of water after taking bath in a bathtub? Is a shower possible in zero gravity? I reflect on these question day and night since I saw the picture of the toilet installed aboard the ISS. Believe me,. it's a real monster.
But, of course, there is more evidence that the earth is not moving and I will share this evidence with you.
The above described facts prove beyond any doubt that the geocentric astronomy of the Torah is true and truly G-d's inspired teaching. The book of the Copernican astrology was supposed to convince humankind that G-d of the Bible is an ignoramus or that the claims of Jews in presenting their Book as G-d inspired are nothing but a delusion. Which also means that Jewish claims to the G-d Promised Land are totally baseless and, therefore, the World has a right to ignore them, which they demonstrate by their Goliath conferences. So now if your trust in Science of the Bible has been restored, you'll read the following prophecies with your hearts ready to embrace them.
“Even if you are dispersed to the ends of the heavens, from there will YHWH your G-d gather you and from there will He take you up. And YHWH your G-d will bring you to the Land which your ancestors have inherited and you shall inherit it. And He will do well by you, and make you more numerous than your ancestors.” (Dt.30:4,5)
And the prophet Jeremiah said the same:
“The days are coming,” declares YHWH, “when men will no longer say, ‘as surely as the Lord lives who brought the Israelites up out of Egypt,’ but they will say, ‘as surely as YHWH lives who brought the Israelites up out of the land of the North and out of all the countries where he banished them.’ For I will restore them to the land that I gave to their forefathers…Then they will know that my name is YHWH.” Jer. 16:14-16, 21).
No human effort can thwart G-d’s purpose. An ancient wisdom says that one of G-d's side is a majority.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment