Almost a Thousand Major Scientists Dissent from Darwin!

Evolutionists, Atheists are wrong and have proved themselves to be fools, frauds, or fanatics

By Dr. Don Boys Sunday, May 2, 2010 (Canada Free Press)

A major storm of protest against the myth of evolution has been building for many years, as proved by almost a thousand major scientists, all with doctorates who have signed on to the following statement as of 2010: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
Those scientists threw down the gauntlet to evolutionists by publishing a two-page ad in a national magazine with the heading, “A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism.” Fevered, fanatical, and foolish evolutionists will charge that those dissenting scientists were backwoods yokels (maybe even a few snake handlers and flat earthers mixed in) dug up by pushy creationists to promote their cause. I have gone over the list and if certification and accreditation are so important, impressive, and indispensable, then those people will give evolutionists a perpetual heartburn. Major scientists around the world agree with them and many of them have not yet signed on to the dissent although they have gone on record that mutations and natural selection did not produce evolution. Other major scientists critical of evolution have died in the last 25 years.

I wrote in my Evolution: Fact, Fraud, or Faith? that “a mutation is an unexpected and random change in a cell, produced by the penetration of the cell by radiation, mutagenic chemical or other disorganizing agent. Mutations produce change, but not improvements. Evolutionists believe that most mutations are harmful while others believe they are all harmful or neutral.” Evolutionists must claim that some mutations are helpful because basically, all evolution rests upon that premise.
Pierre Grasse was known as the greatest scientist in France, and he disputed the value of mutations when he wrote, “...No matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution.” Grasse went on to say that it “is not true” that bacteria are evolving quickly because of numerous mutations. He reminds all that “To vary and to evolve are two different things; this can never be sufficiently emphasized.” Devious, deceptive, and dishonest evolutionists now claim that change is evolution, but that is so silly it is embarrassing. Everyone admits to change, but the change is never from a simple to a more complex creature. Never.
Grasse was supported earlier by Professor N. H. Nilsson of Lund University who said, “There is no single instance where it can be maintained that any of the mutants studied has a higher vitality than the mother species.” Nilsson added, “It is therefore, absolutely impossible to build a current evolution on mutations or on recombinations.” 

Michael Pitman, (died 2000) former chemistry professor at Cambridge, confessed, “Neither observation nor controlled experiment has shown natural selection manipulating mutations so as to produce a new gene, hormone, enzyme system or organ.”
Not only are mutations always harmful, but they produce changes in present characters, never producing new characters. Mutations are the catalyst for defects, deformity, disease, and death; yet evolutionists scream that they are the explanation for all the varieties we see in the animal and plant kingdoms. They teach that the many changes in combination with the pressure of the environment over billions of years have produced the differences between one-cell amoeba and complicated humans; however, mutations never create; they corrupt. Thus, the results of all mutations: disorder, defects, disease, deformity, and death.

The mutation theory is without any scientific foundation

The mutation theory is without any scientific foundation. In fact, Ernst Mayr, a famous evolutionist, believed mutations were the answer as to how evolution allegedly took place, but his own experiments with fruit flies proved the opposite! Mayr tried to increase and decrease the number of bristles on fruit flies that normally have 36, but he discovered that the flies died if they had more than 56 and fewer than 25. Repeated experiments of 30 generations proved the fact of limitations, and when the fruit flies were left alone, they were back to 36 bristles in five years!  Of course, change takes place, but it is always limited change and never any improvement.

No fruit fly, peppered moth or any other creature has formed a new creature through mutations and natural selection, and more and more top scientists are supporting that position. The co-holder of the 1945 Nobel Prize for developing penicillin, Sir Ernest Chain, called natural selection and chance mutations a “hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts.” And the murmur continues. The 1971 winner of the Nobel Prize in science, Dr. Dennis Gabor (died 1979) said: “I just cannot believe that everything developed by random mutations…”
We creationists will continue to remind evolutionists that their lie about “change” has been exposed. Richard Dawkins wrote of evolution, “No reputable scientist” refuses to accept evolution.  A similar statement has been declared by many silly, shallow scientists and the gullible continue to believe it. However, a lie is a lie if everyone (including “experts’) believe it. The above quotes from world-famous scientists prove Dawkins is a Dummy.

Moreover, as I scanned the list of dissenting scientists I was impressed with so many of various fields, all from prestigious universities who were willing to “put their names on the line” for all to see. Those courageous scientists were experts in medicine, biology, geology, anthropology, zoology, physics, genetics, etc. holding doctoral degrees from Rutgers, MIT, Baylor, Oxford, Dartmouth, Tulane, Columbia, Cornell, Princeton, Purdue, Indiana, Yale, Duke, Stanford, Cambridge, Temple, Berkeley, and many others. Even a few Christian universities such as Liberty, Cedarville, Asbury, Wheaton, etc., are represented.

I am waiting for Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, Dennett, and Company to admit their lies in the advancement of atheism as they have declared that “evolution is a fact not disputed by any qualified scientists.” Obviously the atheists are wrong and have proved themselves to be fools, frauds, or fanatics.  Maybe all evolutionists are in a special classification—Homo Ignoramus!

Many atheists thrive on ignorance
Front page / Science / MysteriesSource: Pravda.Ru 25.03.2009

by Babu G. Ranganathan
Information, whether it be information in the genetic code, on a computer software program, on a type-written page, on a hand-written page, in radio signals, in the electrical signals flowing through a telephone line, anything where there is sequential arrangement of matter or energy conveying instructions, messages, codes, such phenomenon does not happen and cannot happen by chance.

Many people who easily believe in Darwinian macro-evolution theory do not understand what genes really are. They are information. DNA is information! Those who do understand and still believe in macro-evolutionary theory should know better or have been so brainwashed so as not to think critically about the theory or they wish to believe in the theory in spite of evidence to the contrary for personal motives and reasons.
Even Chaos theory shows that only a minimal level of order will ever be possible by chance.

The creation/evolution issue really begins with the origin of life. So, let's start there. We will not bother discussing the issue of time and the age of the earth and universe. Many do not realize the assumptions involved and the circular reasoning used by evolutionists in their various dating methods. That is another story. So, let's begin with the origin of life issue. Millions of high school and college biology textbooks imply that Stanley Miller, in the 1950's, showed that life could arise by chance. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Miller, in his famous experiment in 1953, showed that individual amino acids (the building blocks of life) could come into existence by chance. But, it's not enough just to have amino acids. The various amino acids that make-up life must link together in a precise sequence, just like the letters in a sentence, to form functioning protein molecules. If they're not in the right sequence the protein molecules won't work. It has never been shown that various amino acids can bind together into a sequence by chance to form protein molecules. Even the simplest cell is made up of many millions of various protein molecules.

Also, what many don't realize is that Miller had a laboratory apparatus that shielded and protected the individual amino acids the moment they were formed, otherwise the amino acids would have quickly disintegrated and been destroyed in the mix of random energy and forces involved in Miller's experiment.

There is no innate chemical tendency for the various amino acids to bond with one another in a sequence. Any one amino acid can just as easily bond with any other. The only reason at all for why the various amino acids bond with one another in a precise sequence in the cells of our bodies is because they're directed to do so by an already existing sequence of molecules found in our genetic code.

In Nature there are what scientists call right-handed and left-handed amino acids. However, life requires that all proteins be left-handed. So, not only do millions of amino acids have to be in the correct sequence, they also all have to be left-handed. If a right-handed amino acid gets mixed in then the protein molecules won't function. There won't be any life!

Similarly, the nucleic acids in DNA and RNA must be in a precise sequence. The sugar molecules that make-up the various nucleic acids in DNA and RNA must be right-handed. If a nucleic acid with a left-handed sugar molecule gets into the mix then nothing will work.

If the cell had evolved it would have had to be all at once. A partially evolved cell cannot wait millions of years to become complete because it would be highly unstable and quickly disintegrate in the open environment, especially without the protection of a complete and fully functioning cell membrane. And even having a complete cell doesn't necessarily mean there will be life. After all, even a dead cell is complete shortly after it dies!

Of course, once there is a complete and living cell then the genetic code and other biological mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells. The question is how could life have arisen naturally when there was no directing mechanism at all in Nature.

The great British scientist Sir Frederick Hoyle has said that the probability of the sequence of molecules in the simplest cell coming into existence by chance is equivalent to a tornado going through a junk yard of airplane parts and assembling a 747 Jumbo Jet!

Thanks to popular evolutionist writers like Richard Dawkins, many in society have come to believe that natural selection will solve all of evolution's problems. Natural selection cannot produce anything. It can only "select" from what is produced. Furthermore, natural selection operates only once there is life and not before.

Evolutionists believe that random mutations in the genetic code, caused by environmental forces such as radiation, will produce over time increasingly more complex genes for natural selection to use so that life can evolve from simpler species to more complex ones. There is no evidence that chance mutations can or will provide increasingly more complex genes for natural selection to act upon so that evolution would be possible from simpler species to more complex ones. It's like saying that the random changes caused by an earthquake will increase the complexity of houses and buildings!

Natural selection is not an active force. It is a passive process in Nature. Only those variations that have survival value will be "selected" or be preserved. Once a variation has survival value then, of course, it's not by chance that it is "selected". But, natural selection, itself, does not produce or design those biological variations. The term "natural selection" is simply a figure of speech. Nature does not do any active or conscious selecting. It is an entirely passive process. "Natural selection" is just another way of saying "natural survival". If a biological change occurs that helps a species to survive then that species, obviously, will survive (i.e. be "selected"). Natural selection can only "select" from biological variations that are possible and which have survival value.
Natural selection is just another tern for survival of the fittest. But, survival of the fittest is exactly what makes Darwinian macro-evolution impossible. How can a partially evolved species be fit for survival? A partially evolved trait or organ that is not completely one or the other will be a liability to a species, not a survival asset.

The only evolution in nature that is observable and can be called science is microevolution, which is variations within biological kinds such as varieties of dogs, cats, horses and cows.

Macroevolution, or variations across kinds, is not science but faith.
The genes exist in all species for microevolution but not for macroevolution, and, as stated already, there is no scientific evidence that random genetic mutations caused by natural forces such as radiation can or will generate entirely new genes for entirely new traits for natural selection to act upon.
Genetic similarities between species are no proof of common biological ancestry because it cannot be proved that these similarities are due to a common biological ancestry via chance mutations.

What if the similarities between species are due to a common designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes? Only genetic similarities within a biological kind can be used as proof of relationship.
It is not rational to believe that genes can come into existence by accident or chance. Just ask any genetic engineer!

Thus, it is far more logical to believe that genetic similarities between species are due to a common designer rather than common chance evolutionary ancestry .
In the midst of arguments over evolution and intelligent design, it is amazing how many in society, including the very educated, believe that scientists had already created life in the laboratory. No such thing has ever happened.
All that scientists have done is genetically engineer already existing forms of life in the laboratory, and by doing this scientists have been able to produce new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter.
Even if scientists ever do produce life from non-living matter it will only be through intelligent design or planning so it still wouldn't help support any theory of life originating by chance or evolution. Even artificial, or synthetic life, is a creation by scientists, through intelligent design, of a DNA code built from "scratch" which is then inserted into an already existing living cell.
There simply is no scientific basis for believing life could have arisen by chance processes even if given the right environmental conditions to sustain life. What if we should discover life on Mars?

Even if we should discover life on Mars it wouldn't prove that such life originated by chance. Also, if we do find evidence of life on Mars it would have most likely have come from our very own planet - Earth! In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which could have easily spewed rock and dirt containing microbes into outer space much of which eventually could have reached Mars. A Newsweek article of September 21, 1998, p.12 mentions exactly this possibility.
"We think there's about 7 million tons of earth soil sitting on Mars", says scientist Kenneth Nealson. "You have to consider the possibility that if we find life on Mars, it could have come from the Earth" [Weingarten, T., Newsweek, September 21, 1998, p.12].

This would also explain, as MIT scientist Dr. Walt Brown has pointed out, why some meteorites contain organic compounds because they are remnants of the original debris spewed from the Earth due to very fierce ancient geological disturbances and activity. Natural laws are adequate to explain how the order in life, the universe, and even a microwave oven operates, but mere undirected natural laws cannot fully explain the origin of such order.

The best little article ever written refuting the origin of life by chance is "A Few Reasons an Evolutionary Origin of Life Is Impossible" by scientist and biochemist Dr. Duane T. Gish. Dr. Gish presents "simple" but profound scientific barriers to evolution of life which aren't mentioned or covered in Johnny's high school biology textbook or in college textbooks for that matter. This article is truly great! Dr. Gish's article may be accessed here.

All of this simply means that real science supports faith in an intelligent Designer behind the origin of life and the universe. It is only fair that evidence supporting intelligent design be presented to students alongside of evolutionary theory. Science cannot prove that we're here by either chance or design. Both require faith. Where will you place your faith?

The author, Babu G. Ranganathan, is an experienced Christian writer. Mr. Ranganathan has his B.A. degree with concentrations in theology and biology. As a religion and science writer he has been recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis Who's Who In The East. The author's website may be accessed at: www.religionscience.com.

Turkish Military Officials in Israel to Pick Up Drones
Tammuz 10, 5770, 22 June 10 08:41 by Hana Levi Julian

(Israelnationalnews.com) A Turkish military delegation arrived Tuesday in Israel to pick up the rest of an order of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones – this, despite rumors just a week ago that Ankara had canceled the deal.
According to a report in the Turkish Zayman daily newspaper, the delegation is expected to stay for at least two weeks. The military officials allegedly came “to conclude test runs in the delivery of four Israeli-made drones, the remaining lot in a 10-UAV deal between Turkey and Israel.”

Last week the same paper reported that all military agreements with Israel had been canceled by Prime Minister Tayyip Recep Erdogan in another slap at the Jewish State following the clash on the Turkish-sponsored six-ship flotilla that attempted to break Israel's sovereignty over Gaza waters.

Among the deals that were nixed, according to that report, was the agreement with Israel Aerospace Industries to supply the Heron UAV to the Turkish Air Force. The $180 million contract with IAI and Elbit Systems included electronic equipment and spare parts in addition to the 10 Heron drones.

The Turkish government admitted Friday to slaughtering as many as 120 Kurdish rebels in raids on their hideouts in northern Iraq last month. Israeli-made unmanned drones have been used to attack the positions, which were located with assistance from U.S. intelligence sources.

Erdogan, who had announced the suspension in the military hardware deals with Israel, also reportedly vowed yesterday to “destroy” the Kurdish rebels.
Meanwhile, Turkish author and philospher Adnan Oktar told Israel National News on Tuesday afternoon that although there is indeed "mutual tension" at present, he believes it is still possible to salvage the once-strong diplomatic and cultural ties between the two countries.

"Devout Jews and devout Muslims can establish peace and security in the Middle East," Oktar said. "One of them is the son of Ishmael and the other is the son of Jacob... It is not only Muslims who are trapped behind the walls; Jews are also imprisoned behind them. Let them come and live freely and build factories and open universities and do business in Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Turkey."

Ironically, Oktar added that the ideologies of atheism and Darwinism, seen so often as marks of progress in secular, intellectual circles, would ultimately prove the undoing of both Jewish and Muslim societies in the Middle East: "Bloodshed is inevitable, because these ideologies believe that conflict is essential to progress," he explained.Evolutionists, Atheists are wrong and have proved themselves to be fools, frauds, or fanatics.

Reports: IAF Landed at Saudi Base, US Troops near Iran Border
Tammuz 11, 5770, 23 June 10 04:36, by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

(Israelnationalnews.com) The Israeli Air Force recently unloaded military equipment at a Saudi Arabia base, a semi-official Iranian news agency claimed Wednesday, while a large American force has massed in Azerbaijan, which is on the northwest border of Iran.

Both reports follow by less than a week the Pentagon’s confirmation that an unusually large American fleet sailed through the Suez Canal Saturday. Several reports stated that an Israeli ship joined the armada.

The Pentagon played down the news, saying the American maneuvers were routine. However, a report by Iran on Wednesday that it has enriched dozens of pounds of 17 per cent enriched uranium serves as a reminder that time is running out to stop Iran from being able to produce a nuclear weapon.

Iran’s Fars News Agency said the Israeli military aircraft landed 10 days ago at the Saudi base near the city of Tabuk, located in northwest Saudi Arabia, one of the closest areas in the oil kingdom to Iran.

Fars said that the Tabuk base will be the central station for an Israeli attack on Iran. It quoted an Islamic news site that a commercial airline passenger said the airport in Tabuk was closed to all other traffic during the alleged Israeli landings. The passenger said that "no reasonable explanation” was given for shutting down the airport and those passengers were compensated financially and booked in four-star hotels.

“The relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel have become the talk of the town,” the passenger added. The chief authority in Tabuk, Prince Fahd ben Sultan, was reported be coordinating the cooperation with Israel.

Azerbaijan
Iran’s government-funded Press TV reported that the Revolutionary Guards began closely patrolling the Islamic Republic’s northwestern border after noticing the American forces, which Iran claimed also included Israeli troops. Azerbaijan’s independent Trend news site also reported on Wednesday that American armed forces are in the country, which is in an armed conflict with rebels.

Revolutionary Guards Brigadier General Mehdi Moini said Tuesday that his forces are mobilized “due to the presence of American and Israeli forces on the western border.” The Guards reportedly have called in tanks and anti-aircraft units to the area in what amounts to a war alert.

Enriched Uranium

As signs point to a higher American-Israeli military profile aimed at Iran, Ali Akbar Salehi, the Islamic Republic’s vice president and director of the nuclear program, announced Wednesday that Iran has produced another 37 pounds of uranium enriched to 20 percent. The production of the uranium defies United Nations demands that Iran stop its unsupervised nuclear development, although the 20 percent level is far below level that is needed to build a nuclear weapon.
"Potentially, we can produce 5 kilograms (11 pounds) a month, but we are not in a hurry over this," Salehi told the semiofficial ISNA news agency.

Russian Church vs. Darwinism

Tuesday May 25, 2010 MYT 1:46:16 AM
In Moscow, Orthodox Christian churches draw closer
MOSCOW (Reuters) - President Dmitry Medvedev warmly welcomed the spiritual leader of the world's 300 million Orthodox Christians on Tuesday, hailing improving ties between Russia's powerful church and its ancestor faith.
Relations among the Orthodox have improved after past strains when churches in former Soviet states such as Estonia and Ukraine broke away from the Russian mother church and tried to pledge allegiance to the patriarch in Istanbul.
"The visit of your Holiness is a significant event and, beyond all doubt, it will help strengthen the dialogue which always linked the two sisterly churches," Medvedev told Bartholomew, the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, according to a transcipt published by the Kremlin.
Russia's influential Patriarch Kirill has assigned a high priority to improving inter-faith relations since his election last year. Church sources say dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church has improved markedly and an historic meeting between Pope Benedict and the Russian Patriarch is now in prospect.
Medvedev said Bartholomew's visit was "especially important, taking into account the fact that Russia is a country where the majority of the population is Christian Orthodox in its faith".
The size and growing political clout of the Russian Church, which has strong backing from Medvedev and premier Vladimir Putin, contrasts sharply with Bartholomew, who has a tiny flock and is under severe pressure from the Turkish authorities.
Turkey refuses to recognise Bartholomew's full title and has kept his church's main seminary in Halki closed despite pressure from the European Union and U.S. President Barack Obama.
Addressing Bartholomew, Medvedev stressed "the constructive and fully-fledged dialogue between the Russian Orthodox Church and the state ... which allows us to tackle very hard tasks".
THE MOTHER CHURCH
Underlining his status as Orthodox leader, Bartholomew replied: "We, as the Mother Church, are glad about this success and harmony, about these kind relations of cooperation which exist between the state and the Russian Orthodox Church."
Muslim Istanbul, formerly the Byzantine capital Constantinople, is the ancient seat of Orthodox Christianity.
Patriarch Kirill, who leads the biggest of the Orthodox churches with 160 million believers, visited Bartholomew in 2009 to show his interest in improving relations.
Greeting the Ecumenical Patriarch in Moscow, Kirill has shown deference to his guest and even personally translated his address from Greek into Russian for the congregation during a solemn service in Moscow's gold-domed Christ the Saviour Cathedral.
The previous day, the two church leaders led a procession of 40,000 through central Moscow to commemorate the name days of Cyril and Methodius, the saints who brought Orthodoxy to the Slavs in the ninth century.
Amid the signs of mutual respect, it was unclear whether the two sides discussed the contentious issue of breakaway Orthodox Churches in Ukraine and Estonia.
Religion experts said that the significance of Bartholomew's visit to Moscow could not be over-estimated.
"This is an extraordinary visit," said Father Mark Arey, of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, an expert on relations between Moscow and Constantinople.
"It signals a real synergy for world Orthodoxy and shows they (the patriarchs) are working towards solutions of the problems they have."
(Additional reporting by Ayla Jean Yackley, editing by Paul Taylor)
(Writing by Dmitry Solovyov; Editing by xxx)

Russia Church wants end to Darwin school "monopoly"
Thu, Jun 10 2010
By Conor Humphries
MOSCOW (Reuters) - The Russian Orthodox Church called Wednesday for an end to the "monopoly of Darwinism" in Russian schools, saying religious explanations of creation should be taught alongside evolution.
Liberals said they would fight efforts to include religious teaching in schools. Russia's dominant church has experienced a revival in recent years, worrying rights groups who say its power is undermining the country's secular constitution.
"The time has come for the monopoly of Darwinism and the deceptive idea that science in general contradicts religion. These ideas should be left in the past," senior Russian Orthodox Archbishop Hilarion said at a lecture in Moscow.
"Darwin's theory remains a theory. This means it should be taught to children as one of several theories, but children should know of other theories too."
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution has proved divisive in the United States, where Protestant groups promote Creationism, the idea that God made the world as described in the Bible, and the "intelligent design" view positing an unnamed creator.
The atheist Soviet state, which collapsed in 1991, used Darwin to disprove religious teachings. The theory, which biologists say gives a verifiable explanation for how life forms develop through natural selection, now dominates in Russian schools as it does in science teaching in most countries.
Hilarion said the theory that one species could evolve into another had never been proved. Children "should know about the religious picture, the creation of the world, which is common to all the monotheistic religions," he said.

DANGEROUS IDEA
Lyudmila Alexeyeva, a veteran dissident, told Reuters Russian liberals would fight any attempt to introduce religious teaching into Russian classrooms, particularly in science.
"It's a dangerous idea and we will do all we can to stop it," she said. "We overcame Communism as the state ideology and certain forces want to replace it with Orthodox Christianity."
She said it was unlikely religious teaching would replace Darwin in the national curriculum, but it could find its way into some schools with enough pressure from the Church.
Hilarion heads the Church's external relations department. His lecture to Russian Foreign Ministry officials in Moscow was dedicated to fighting "fanatical secularism" of liberals hostile to religion, and called for dialogue with moderate secularists and cooperation with Catholics against common foes.
Orthodox Christianity is Russia's dominant religion and both President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin regularly attend Orthodox services.
Russia also boasts several large religious minorities -- including around 20 million Muslims in a population of 141 million -- which have at times expressed concern about what they say is the privileged place of the Orthodox Church.
Medvedev on June 1 signed a law making July 28 a national holiday to mark the Church's founding with the baptism of Prince Vladimir in Kiev in 988. Muslim lawmakers have since asked for a national holiday to mark the arrival of Islam in Russia.
Hilarion said other faiths should not be worried as the baptism holiday was dedicated to all citizens due to the role of Vladimir's baptism in the foundation of the Russian state.
"It is difficult to even imagine Russia -- if there would even be a Russia ... if that choice had not been made," he said.
(Writing by Conor Humphries; editing by Peter Graff)
© Thomson Reuters 2010. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.
Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, use the Reprints tool at the top of any article or visit: www.reutersreprints.com.

The Remedy of the Last Resort in the Gulf of Mexico

Nuclear Explosion Can Heal the Bleeding Wound in the Gulf of Mexico
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/113370-oil_leak-0, 13.05.2010

The catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico will obviously take a special place in the history of the human civilization. Forward-looking people say that the disaster is a warning of the wrong way of the future development. Others say that it was just an accident which took place through the fault of specialists, who did not provide required conditions for safe exploitation of the oil well.
No matter how we may evaluate the catastrophe, it gives us a reason to think whether humans live and act reasonably and how we use our spiritual and physical gifts. Unfortunately, the conclusions are sad since they show our dullness and thoughtlessness.

It is clear that the measures, which are now being taken to lock the broken pipe, will not bring any result in the nearest future. The pressure of crude and gas is too high, it goes about hundreds of atmospheres. They now hope to contain the leak with the help of steel and concrete domes, but the hopes for that are tiny. It will be extremely difficult to mount the dome: the depth of the gulf is about 1.5 kilometers, and the “orifice” is small. It is impossible to find out what it looks like after the explosion. Crude is supposed to be pumped from the dome to the tanker on the surface of the gulf along a special pipe.

his is a very complicated an unreliable system. As far as I know there was no such an occurrence in the world practice of oil extraction. Therefore, anything can happen, and it is impossible to foresee everything. The oil leak will only strengthen since it is only going to accumulate underneath the dome and geological horizons.

The dome installed above the well will only give a short break in the liquidation of the disastrous consequences. What can be done next ? There are practically no variants because no one has ever done that before in such conditions.
It was only a matter of hit or miss which earlier resulted in the nuclear disaster in Chernobyl, explosions in coal mines all over the world and also in the catastrophes which occur on a regular basis, but are very hard to liquidate. One may say that the American hit or miss has led to one of the most technologically complicated and horrific disasters.

It is practically impossible to block the leaking well. There are neither specific technical possibilities for that, nor any methods to liquidate such oil-well flowing.

The USSR had a sad experience in containing oil-well flowing in Central Asia. Two breakdowns occurred almost simultaneously. One of them took place in Urtabulak, where a gas torch was burning. The other one took place in Pamuk – a breakdown at an oil well. The two giant flames were extinguished with the help of nuclear explosions. They drilled two wells to approach the emergency wells under the ground and lowered nuclear devices into the wells. The troubled wells were blocked as a result of the explosions.

The work was extremely hard, but it was worth it. I took direct participation in the experiment and was personally present there during the explosions. The experiment was a success. The exploitation of the Pamuk oil well was launched again and nothing could remind of the disaster which had been liquidated with the help of nuclear explosions.

Afterwards, Soviet specialists conducted similar experiments in Turkmenia and then proceeded to worked-out deposits. The results were encouraging. Soviet specialists hoped that they could promote their technology to help other countries, the ones that signed the non-proliferation treaty but could use nuclear explosions in industrial purposes.

The US declined the program over the threat of radioactivity. As a result, the Americans offered to ban the use of nuclear explosions in peaceful purposes.
It now seems that a nuclear explosion could be the only way to contain the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. It is notruled out that British and American specialists will find a new solution to liquidate such complicated disasters that, as it turns out, may occur to absolutely reliable platforms.

Extracting oil in oceans and seas has its pluses and minuses. It brings hydrocarbons for the chemical industry and fuel for cars – the cars that continue to conquer the human civilization. It seems that the number of cars in the world will soon be comparable to the number of people living on the planet. It is about time one should realize that cars no longer exist for people – people exist for cars. People fight for parking lots, territory for garages and get traffic jams in return. As a result, we have to pay enormous price for the comfort of movement – we sacrifice our ecology, health and the future of our children.

Oil wells drilled in oceans and seas slowly kill the planet. Thousands of kilometers of oil wells are like bleeding wounds on the surface of the planet. They result in numerous natural disasters – from earthquakes to volcano eruptions.
Oil leaks occur all the time. It will be enough to fly above any pipeline to see that. It is worthy of note that the West helps Russia build its own sea-based oil platforms. We already have several platforms near Sakhalin and will soon have more in the Caspian Sea. What if a similar disaster occurs in Russia too?
Vladimir Gubarev
Pravda.Ru

Barack Obama sends nuclear experts to tackle BP's Gulf of Mexico oil leak

The US has sent a team of nuclear physicists to help BP plug the "catastrophic" flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico from its leaking Deepwater Horizon well, as the Obama administration becomes frustrated with the oil giant's inability to control the situation. Published: 7:57PM BST 14 May 2010

A watery expanse of 600,000 square miles, the Gulf features marshes and coral reefs, commercial and recreational fisheries and hundreds of wildlife species, including imperiled birds, whales and sea turtles. Many are in harm's way, as the oil unleashed when an offshore rig exploded two weeks ago threatens their food supply and the marshlands where they spawn or build nests.

While some conservative pundits, such as Rush Limbaugh, have called this "Obama's Katrina," that's not how the public feels, the poll found. BP PLC, which owned the well that has gushed more than 4 million gallons since an Apr. 20 oil rig explosion, is getting more of the public's ire.

Palestine, a Holy Land of the Children of the Sun

KJV, the Bible of the Fascists

Paul's rejection of the Hebrew Torah was read by the translators of the King James Version into 2 Tim 2:15: “Study to show yourself approved to YHWH, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” This intended mistranslation has seemingly supported the “no-law” teaching of Christianity as they seek to divide, sectionalize, and otherwise dissect the Bible in an erroneous manner. 2 Tim 2:15 became “one of the most overworked verses of the Scripture employed by the “no-law” proponents “ Almost every modern Bible translation does not follow the King James text; the New World Translation reads, “…handling the Word of Truth aright.” The New English Bible offers, “try hard to show yourself worthy of YHWH’s approval, as a laborer who need not be ashamed, be straightforward in your proclamation of the truth.”

The King James Bible was actually a modified version of the so-called Bishops’ Bible; the third edition of the Bishops’ Bible published in 1572, is called the Leda Bible from the decoration in the initial at the Epistle to the Hebrews which is a startling and incongruous woodcut of Jupiter visiting Leda in the guise of a swan. This and other decorations in the New Testament were taken from an edition of Ovid’s Metamorphoses! The KJV means an intended paganization of the Hebrew monotheist Bible. Consider another weighty example of this paganization, the word Easter.
Passover and Easter are two different things and that what Acts refers to is the Passover, not “Easter”. Modern versions of the Bible all translate pascha as “Passover.” The word Easter derives from Eastre, a Teutonic goddess of Spring who received offerings in the month of April. The word “Easter” does not occur in the original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. As a matter of fact, the only place it can be found in an English version of the Bible is in the King James Version (Acts 12:4).
This hellenization or paganization of the Hebrew Bible was embraced by the fascist ideologues who argued: “While there are a phletora of Jewish elements present in early Christianity, they have been overemphasized to the detriment of the Hellenistic contribution. Christianity is, after all, a Hellenistic religion and the New Testament is written entirely in Greek, the learned tongue of the Roman Empire. And while the figure of Jesus did not conform to the conventional Jewish image of what a Messiah would be like, there are other powerful reasons why Christianity, as a religious movement, was more enticing to the spirit of Greek culture.
As Vittorio Macchioro notes in his study From Orpheus to Paul. A History of Orphism. (New York; Henry Holt, 1930): “The Greeks themselves had been working toward Christianity for many centuries…The Jewish revival, centering around the Messianic person of Jesus, can not be considered the real Christianity. What people call Christianity, and what Christianity turns out really to be, is the product of Greek thought, is the result of Greek belief in Jesus.
We find the same idea in a recent official publication of the Vatican: “It was this Spirit which inspired the creation of two of the most illustrious of the humanistic institutions of the Holy See: the Vatican Library and the Vatican Museums. Both were the outcome of a vision of Greco-Roman culture as the perfect, almost timeless expression of human creativity at its highest levels - thought and art - and as the precursor, at times almost the prefigurement, of Christanity, above all in the West.” (Guide to the Vatican Museums. Gestione Vendita Publicazioni Musei Vaticani, Citta del Vaticano. 1979, o. 12). This Guide was published one year into the pontificate of John Paul II, who can be considered the ideological Father of Palestinian state.

On a deeper level this Guide could be considered a brain child of one Francis Parker Yockey, who ha been described by some researchers as “America’s Hitler” was the best friend of Palestinians. He graduated from Notre Dame Law School. In 1942 when Haj Amin went to Berlin Yockey enlisted in the army and went AWOL, for an extended period shortly thereafter. He was eventually given a medical discharge from the army in 1943 on the grounds that he suffered from “dementia praecox, paranoid type.” In 1945 he went to Northern Ireland, where he wrote The Philosophy of History and Politics. In this book Yockey wrote. “The Jew is spiritually worn out. He can no longer develop. He can produce nothing in the sphere of thought or research. He lives solely with the idea of revenge on the nations of the white European-American race.” Yockey warned that Jews were bound to destroy the West. In 1952 Yockey’s passport was revoked in absentia by the State Department, and by 1954 he was identified as a US agent for a neo-Nazi, Rudolph Aschenauer.

In the Palestinain propaganda the Jews are treated as a mongrel race: “The twelve sons of Jacob fled to Egypt, interbred with the Egyptians there and became numerous. Moses and his followers wandered in the desert; they were not endowed with any scientific or artistic talents and made no cultural achievements whatsoever…” And as such, as A. Hitler pointed out: “The Jewish person, with all its apparent intellectual qualities, is nevertheless without any true culture, especially without a culture of its own. For the sham culture which the Jew possesses today is the property of other peoples, and is mostly spoiled in his hands.” In the Mind distorted by the Nazi propaganda the Biblical geocentrism and creationism are no cultural achievements whatsoever. And that explains the double rehabilitation of Galileo and evolutionism by John Paul II and his postulate of establishing a Palestinian state on the ruins of the Jewish state. And here let me point out how the KJV is helpful in such an undertaking.

According to the World Book Encyclopedia “Palestine is one of the most famous lands in the world. It is the Holy Land of the Bible. It has been known in history for at least 5,000 years. Palestine is sacred to three great religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.” No, the author of this entry did not write that it was the “Palestinians” who wrote the Hebrew Bible, but one would be justified to draw such a conclusion. This fraud is, of course, based on King James Version of Ex 15:14:

The people shall hear, and be afraid; sorrow shall take hold on the inhabitants of Palestina. (Cf. also Is 14:29)

In the Contemporary English Version (New York, 1995) the same verse reads:

Nations learned of this and trembled – Philistines shook with horror.

In other words King James hoaxers identified the biblical Philistines with the name Palestina which was given by Roman Emperor Hadrian in AD 132 to the province of Judea. Etymologically, the Roman name Palestina can be derived from the name of the Greek invaders of the Holy Land i.e. Philistines.

The Aegean people and their offshoot in Canaan left no written history. There are no documents in Philistine language. That explains the fact that their gods mentioned in biblical and other sources bore Semitic names and were probably borrowed from the “conquered” Canaanites. In modern terminology they were illiterate mercenaries or illegal aliens who were assimilated fast by the local culture. The word seranim mentioned in the Book of Joshua used of the heads of the Philistine cities, is equated by many with Greek τΰραννος, ‘tyrant’. Incidentally, the word tyrannos is non-Indo-european, probably of eastern origin and meaning “king.” The concept of tyranny implied a reign of terror and the worst form of government, (cp. Y. Arafat’s tyranny), and tyrannies usually fell to oligarchies or the “rule of the few”, or a minority of wealthy people, like the clique around Y. Arafat. So it remains to be seen how the Palestinians are superior to the Biblical Jews.

And here is another hoax of the King James' translators which informed Ch. Darwin's science of evolutionism:

“Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving
creature, and fowl that may fly above the earth…” (Gen. 1:20)

They read into this verse the evolutionist dogma of Anaximander who taught that men were first produced in fishes; when they were grown and able to help themselves, were thrown up and so lived upon the land.” The Christian churches swarmed with swarms of mermaids and their Philistine male counterparts called Dagon thus predisposing the minds for swift acceptance of Darwin’s gobbledygook. His latest apprentice K.R. Miller in his book Finding Darwin’s God ridiculed the Bible again by pointing out that in Gen 1 the “waters bring forth fowl,” but in Gen 2 God formed fowl “out of the ground”. No, Gen 1:20 doesn't proclaim mythological and philosophical evolutionism immortalized in the English expression that “something is both fish and fowl.”

The Hebrew text of this verse reads:

“Let the waters swarm with swarms of
living creatures and let fowl fly above the earth…”
And click on the link to see a picture from the Nuremberg Chronicle depicting the Biblical creation on the same day.
rareprintcoloring.com/

If you compare this picture with Copernicus's heliocentric diagram you'll better understand the difference between Biblical creationism and solar evolutionism.

www.st.poznan.pl/index.php?url=szkola/patron
At the Pagan Sources of Darwin's “Warm Pond”.

The concept of the Central or Spiritual sun is known by many different names the world over.. According to Greek myths, the heart of the Central Sun beats and vibrations spread throughout the galaxy. This central Sun is a fountain of 'living waters,' healing 'waters' or of healing energy. Ancient wisdom traditions maintain humans, and all other beings in our galaxy, emanate from and share a common home: the Central Sun at the core of our Milky Way galaxy.

The highest Slavic deity, the god Perun, masters the thunder and lightning to create rain clouds although he was also the protector from bad weather and storm. With the help of the god Perun water frees itself from the evil and transforms into the water of life for the just ones. These ''living waters'' are wells, springs, brooks and rivers. This was the reason why the stautes of pagan gods were thrown into rivers at the foot of mountains when Christianity became the official religion.
In a Sumerian hymn Enki stands at the empty river beds and fills them with his 'water.' Sumerian “a” means water, or semen. Let me remind in this context that the Samaritan woman misunderstood the ambiguous offer of 'living water', taking it to be fresh water when Jesus really meant the water of life. And that's, most likely, what Jesus meant by 'birth from above' or 'birth of water and the Holy Spirit.' - John 3:5. The Argive princess Danae was impregnated by Zeus in the guise of a golden shower. Recall in this context that when “one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his (Jesus') side, and forthwith came there out blood and (living) water.” (John 19:33-34) Such a living water could have brought forth the living creature.

Dr. Carl E. Braaten, Professor of Systematic Theology at the Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago observed in his on.line article title The Uniqueness of Christ: “Justin Martyr used the Stoic concept of the logos spermatikos to account for all the truth, beauty, and goodness to be found outside of Christianity. The pagans received all these splendid things through the Logos whose seeds have spread throughout the world. This theory of logos spermatikos found classical expression in the natural theology of the scholastics, in the rational religion of Enlightenment...” Justin Martyr's Logos spermatikos is, of course the Aryan Vishnu who inspired the phallic architecture of Al Aqsa mosque.

"Vishnu in the form of the Solar active energy, neither ever rises nor sets, and is at once, the sevenfold Sun and distinct from it," says Vishnu Purana (Book II., Chap. 1 1). Shiva in his symbol linga is referred to as as fixed or immovable (dhruva). Shiva is worshiped in the form of the linga, in the center of the temple, or inner shrine. The cave temple of Elephanta (6th century) and the rock-cut temple of Ellura (8th century) are perfect examples.

Masonic authority, Albert Pike writes: “If our conceptions of God are those of the ignorant, narrow minded, and vindictive Israelite…we feel that it is an affront and an indignity to God” (Morals and Dogma page 223) This Confederate Brigadier General, in the same book taught that Jehovah is the phallus, Jesus is the vagina, and the Holy Ghost is the sperm of the Godhead!

Creative Vibrations of the Sun god vs. God

Alchemy is the process of initiation that leads the natural soul from the state of prima materia to a condition in which it is transmuted into the ‘golden’ state of spiritual soul” (False Gospel in the Stars: Scorpio, p. 3)

The Greek Hyle means primordial stuff. The first principle out of which the objective Universe was formed. Hylozoism, when philosophically understood, is the highest aspect of Pantheism. It is the only possible escape from atheism based on lethal materiality, and the conceptions of the monotheists; between which two it stands on its own entirely neutral ground. Hylozoism demands absolute Divine Thought, which would pervade the numberless, active, creating Forces, or “Creators”; which entities are moved by, and have their being in, from, and through that Divine Thought, the latter, nevertheless, having no more personal concern in them or their creations, than the Sun and its “radiant matter” has in the sun-flower and its seeds, or in vegetation in general.

“The battle of selection” (Darwin’s struggle for survival + natural selection) and the “stronger force,” if successful, give the victor the right to dominate.” “Human nature is not essentially the same in all people, but mankind, which now inhabits the earth, is composed of races (Italian razza, French races, German Rassen) so different from one another that the lowest of them is even further from the highest race than it is from the highest kind of animal that most closely approximates to man.” (A. Hitler’s Mein Kampf). That’s what the “Palestinian bible” state is all about!
But the Hebrew Bible teaches:
“I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of skill; but time and gift happeneth to them all.” (I changed the KJV “chance” into “gift” because evolutionary chance supersedes God's purpose)

The KJV Inspired Sexual Revolution

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down hereto: it is confusion.( Lev 18:22, 23. Dt. 23:17-18) refers to the Canaanite practice of ritual prostitution; the “price of dog” was the bounty paid to male prostitutes who allowed themselves to be sodmized, dog-fashion, by patrons of the temple. In the gay magazine “Advocate” (issue 710, 6/25/1996) in which the most pro-gay US President B. Clinton was interviewed, an ad showed a dog licking his master’s face and the caption promoted canine love as follows: “Dogs lick their genitals an average of four times a day”… Because, as a gay activist observed: “Queer Christians must also re-envision themselves as God’s lovers and discover a love relation with other species and with the universe itself. They need to become partners in their world with other species and learn to relate to them as friends and lovers. Because, as Pytagoras proclaimed, “Animals share with us the privilege of having a soul “(Cp. That explains the woodcut in the Leda Bible). Incidentally, Zeus had intercourse with his own daughter, who became pregnant by him.

Brahminical Fascism in the Garb of Palestine

Stubbs, a Puritan of Queen Elizabeth’s days, describing the May-day feasts, says: “And then they fall to banquet and feast, to leape and dance about it,” (the May-pole), “as the heathen people did at the dedication of their idolles, whereof this is a perfect picture, or rather the thing itself.” Stubbs was right: the people of England in the year 1550 A.D., and for years afterward, were celebrating the end of the Drift Age, the disappearance of the darkness and the victory of the sun god i.e. the evolutionary god-in-the-process-of-becoming.
The publication of Copernicus’s “The Revolutions” had an immediate political consequence; it strengthened the claims of all monarchs of Europe to absolute power. Copernicus’s sun sitting on the royal throne and commanding his star family, like a patriarch commands his family, inspired the role of a monarch as Augustus, quasi-divine protector of his countrymen. In the ritualized entertainments of European courts, that theme was stressed from the 1540s by the use of stage sets whose perspective lines emphasized the central position to the audience of the ruler’s throne. Using verse and dance and spectacular transformation scenes, masques allegorically referred to the ruler’s power to tap the harmony of the cosmos and reproduce it on earth.
Shakespeare, or whoever he was immediately embraced the fashionable doctrine of heliocentrism:
The glorious planet Sol
In noble eminence enthroned and spher’d
Amidst the other…
using it to proclaim the glory of the English monarchy, and not the glory of God:
The sun not only is the King of the sky
But he is like the King
And the King is like sun.
The correspondence between God, the Sun and the King is confirmed by the “healing power of the English King” derived from the “med’cinable eye of the Sol.”
Many Christians are aware that the word “Easter” does not occur in the original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. As a matter of fact, the only place it can be found in an English version of the Bible is in the King James Version (Acts 12:4). King James was known as “the wisest fool in Christendom.” Passover and Easter are two different things and that what Acts refers to is the Passover, not “Easter”. Modern versions of the Bible all translate pascha as “Passover.” The word Easter derives from Eastre, a Teutonic goddess of Spring who received offerings in the month of April. (Cp. Hitler’s paganism)
Merneptah Stele of ca. 1210 B.C. also known as the “Israel Stele,” describes the victory of Egyptian king Mernepth over peoples from the west, including “Israel.” It shows that by this time a people known, as “Israel” existed in Canaan. But the KJV translators decided to logjam the historical roots of Israel by smuggling into their “Authorized version” the name Palestina which is not corroborated by archeological or other historical sources. King James Version of Ex 15:14:
The people shall hear, and be afraid; sorrow shall take hold on the inhabitants of Palestina. (Cf. also Is 14:29)
One could say that among the KJV translators a protoplast of the present British leftist Galloway decided to launch his Viva Palestina movement by fraudulent translation of this particular verse, which would suggest that The Promised Land was actually not a Semitic Canaan but Greek (or Aryan) Palestina, a state organized by Greek invaders from the Mediterranean islands of Egypt and Gaza, also known as the Sea People from Egyptian inscriptions. In the Contemporary English Version (New York, 1995) the same verse reads:
Nations learned of this and trembled – Philistines shook with horror.
In other words King James hoaxers identified the biblical Philistines with the name Palestina which was given by Roman Emperor Hadrian in AD 132 to the province of Judea. According to Encyclopedia Britannica: “ The name Palestine is derived from the Greek Palaistina, which comes from the Hebrew Pleshet (Land of the Philistines), referring to a small coastal area northwest of Egypt. The Romans used the term Syria Palestina for the southern third of the province of Syria including the former Judea.” That explains why Mashaal, the political boss of Hamas is residing in Damascus. The name Palestine was revived as an official title for a portion of the territory from the Jordan river westward to the Mediterranean coast of a mandate given to the British after World War I. It was a political rape, because the territory given by the Leage of Nations to the British also encompassed the present Jordan. The British colonial policy of divide et impera was conceived with total contempt for the history of the Middle East, and with contempt for the international policy as mandated by the international organization. The Bible mentions that David conquered also 31 towns west of the Jordan River. The Philistines never ruled these towns.
'What’s the Alternative?' MK Orlev: Jordan is Palestine
(Israelnationalnews.com) Asked to present his alternative to the “two-state” Israel-Palestine option, MK Zevulun Orlev (Jewish Home) says, “The Arabs of the Palestinian Authority already have a state – Jordan.”
A Short History of Philistines
The Aegean peoples were adventurous sailors and traders. In the same year as the XIXth Dynasty pharaoh Merneptah (c. 1224-1211) claimed ‘victories’ in Canaan, he also had to confront a violent combined incursion of Libyans and ‘Peoples of the Sea.’ Philistines or ‘Sea People’, as they are called in the Egyptian documents had originated from Cyprus or Crete, or for the most part, it seems, from south-west Asia Minor (Caria), where their non-Semitic language appears to have originated. The Philistines possessed strong cultural affinities with the Mycenaeans (speaking proto-Greek) whose powerful city-states in Greece were suffering destruction at about this time. Sea Peoples, including apparently the Philistines, had already been settling in Canaan before the time of Ramses III, at the expense of the Canaanites. Ramses III defeated the Philistines, but could not throw them back.
The principal area in which they established themselves was the southern part of the Canaanite coastal plain, a fertile strip forty miles long and fifteen or twenty miles deep, in what is now called the Gaza Strip. The Greeks called this territory and the land east of it Palestine. The Greek name falsifies the historical reality of that area; over the years in which they were settling down in their new homes, the Philistines gradually became assimilated to the civilization of the Canaanites, and presumably intermarried with them as well; even their language was eventually replaced by a local Canaanite dialect. Excavations at Ashdod have shown how many Canaanite elements became blended with their originally non-Semitic way of life. Thus the gods of Aegean origin whom they had brought to the country were given the names of Canaanite deities. These included Dagon – formerly Mesopotamian – who became their chief god, with Ashdod as his main center; Baal, worshipped at Ekron as Baalzebul, the prime (mockingly transformed by the Israelites into Baalzebub, Lord of the Flies); and the goddess Ashtoreth.
The city-states of the Philistines, operating more or less in unison, became increasingly important independent military powers, As time went on, their attempts to expand into the hill country inevitably involved them in open conflict with the Israelite tribes.
The Book of Joshua mentions the land Israel had not yet taken in these words: “First there is the Canaanite territory that starts at the Shihor River just east of Egypt and goes north to Ekron. The southern part of this region belongs to the Avvites and the Geshurites, and the land around Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath, and Ekron belongs to the five Philistine rulers.” (Contemporary English Version, Josh. 13:2-3)
The five Philistine rulers and the thirty-one kings west of the Jordan River never created a single Palestinian state. When David became king of Israel, he subdued the Philistines and forced them to pay tribute. The great civilization sacred to Judaism, Christianity and Islam was created by the Hebrews not Philistines or Canaanites.
The ancient Greek pirates referred to in the Egyptian documents as Sea People behaved exactly like the British imperialists of 19th century: “Gain and hold territories that possess the largest supplies of the basic raw materials. Establish naval bases around the world to control the sea and commerce lanes. Blockade and starve into submission any nation or group of nations that opposes this empire control program.”
Dagon -- a god-in-the-process-of-becoming
Dagon, whom the Philistines borrowed from the Bbaylonians was a exact copy of the Hindu avatar of the god Vishnu Matsya, in the shape of half fish, half man. As such this god expressed visually the perennial Aryan evolutionism taught by Brahman Manu:
"The first germ of life was developed by water and heat" (Manu, book i., sloka 8).
"Water ascends toward the sky in vapors; from the sun it descends in rain, from the rain are born the plants, and from the plants, animals" (book iii., sloka 76).
"Each being acquires the qualities of the one which immediately precedes it, in such a manner that the farther a being gets away from the primal atom of its series, the more he is possessed of qualities and perfections" (book i., sloka 20).
"Man will traverse the universe, gradually ascending, and passing through the rocks, the plants, the worms, insects, fish, serpents, tortoises, wild animals, cattle, and higher animals. . . . Such is the inferior degree" (Ibid.).
And this perennial philosophical evolution was smuggled by KJV hoaxers into their “Authorized Version”. The Hebrew text of Genesis 1: 20 reads:
“Let the waters swarm with swarms of
living creatures and let fowl fly above the earth…”
King James hoaxers translated this verse as follows:
“Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving
creature, and fowl that may fly above the earth…”
They read into this verse the evolutionist dogma of Anaximander who taught that men were first produced in fishes; when they were grown and able to help themselves, were thrown up and so lived upon the land.” The Babylonian priests of the god Dagon (Vishnu) wore on their backs a distinctive garb resembling fish scales and their headgears, or mithras resembled fish mouth.The geometrical design of the hattas or kuffiyehs of the modern Palestinians imitate the design of these Babylonian clerical garbs. The central Sun of the Babylonian myth is a fountain of 'living waters,' healing 'waters' or of healing energy (the Aryan term Brahmah means 'energy'). Ancient wisdom traditions maintain humans, and all other beings in our galaxy, emanate from and share a common home: the Central Sun at the core of our Milky Way galaxy.
In a Sumerian hymn Enki stands at the empty river beds and fills them with his 'water.' Sumerian “a” means water, or semen. The early Christian sect of Naassenes identified Osiris with water. The Argive princess Danae was impregnated by Zeus in the guise of a golden shower (Gold was believed in ancient Egypt to be “flesh of the sun”). Recall in this context that when “one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his (Jesus') side, and forthwith came there out blood and (living) water.” (John 19:33-34)
The name Lingam appears as a name of Shiva in the Shiva Sahasranama where it is translated by Ram Karan Sharma as "(Identifiable as) a symbol of the origin of the Universe. The Christian heretic Justin who envisaged Jesus as ever-existent “seed-sowing Reason” believed that the good God was an erect phallus, like Shiva (Hippolytus, Refutation 5.7.21-22). Copernicus's expression “family of stars” belongs to the teachings of the Aryan cosmogony. A few years ago, Father George Coyne, head of the Vatican Observatory Research Group suggested that we might view stars as God's sperm, which is the basic teaching of the Aryan cosmogony. In the Hindu Myth when the desire arose in it (i.e. in the sun god in the shape of linga (phallus) “the creation” or rather emanation or emission (ejaculation) of semen followed. In the beginning there was sexual desire. John Paul II's Theology of the Body was inspired by this teaching.
Babylonian culture displays a systematic assault on Biblical government. Modern science is only the capstone of a long philosophical maturation that includes evolutionism and heliocentrismof the Babylonian “mighty hunter before the Lor. From Genesis through the Prophets (e.g., Micah 5:6) to Revelation, Nimrod's Babylon is associated with seduction, and the boldest element of political seduction seems to be economic. If Babylon is the great political organizer of men and merchants, it is the Canaanites who are the slaves of the slaves (Gen 9:25); not living for themselves (to say nothing of God) but existing as worker-drones, fulfilling the lusts created by Babylon.
The Universal Religion in the Space Age will be nonsectarian because its founding principle is pantheism:”If we move on to other planets, we may find that planetary religion must give way to solar religion – ONE FAITH for the solar system, and this in turn implies the ultimate need for a cosmic religion. We seem to be approaching universal citizenship, which implies the need for a universal religion.” Well, emperor Septimus Severus proposed to bring all his subjects together under the worship of Sol Invictus – the Unconquered Sun – and to subsume under that worship all the various religions and philosophies then current. All gods were to be accepted, as long as one acknowledged the Sun. Will the people who use the lunar calendar be exterminated?
praja arya jyotiragrah ... (Children of Arya are led by light) Rig Veda, VII. 33.17
We are all souls of fire and children of the sun (John Tyndall, an early darwinist)
The Aryan mode of worship was centred on the fire altar of the sun god, while the Dravidians had water as the base. The Rigveda describes the battle between the forces of light and the forces of darkness. The Vedas proclaim the victory of the light and the destruction of the forces of darkness. The Rigvedic peoples originally had only two social classes: nobles and commoners. Eventually, they added a third: Dasas , or "darks." Dasyus, Dasas, and Panis as people are opposite to Aryans. They are “unspiritual people”. They do not sacrifice, do not offer gifts, do not honor the Gods. In other contexts they are not even people but demons…Dasyu means destroyer and often simply means a robber, a criminal or an uncivilized person or a low class person.In India, under the British Empire, the foundation of Hinduism was ascribed to northern invaders who had established themselves as the dominant castes, and who were supposed to have created the sophisticated Vedic texts. (Entry Caste Wiki) Adressing a man as Arya is equivalent to calling him ‘Sir’ in English.“The brahmin gods are all symbols to destroy the oppressed. The brahmans say ‘aham brahmasmi’ which means everything belongs to me, including Palestine. The Bhagvad Gita and Upanishads are books which will put Mein Kampf to shame. Bhagvad Gita asks the upper caste pandavas to kill their cousins the lower caste kauravas” (Kancha Ilaiah‘Why I am not a Hindu.’2009) According to this postulate, in India, sick and starving people 'of low caste' are left to die in the streets. In Origin of Species (p. 335) Darwin wrote about “the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind.” Some Indian nationalists supported the British version of the theory because it gave them the prestige of common descent with the ruling British class. (Wiki)The British used solar Aryanism to colonize India exactly like the Romans used their solar religion to colonize Africa and Israel turning it into a colony of solar Syria (Syria-Palestina)
“The World Took Its Culture from an elite class” –
A. Hitler, Reden, Schriften, Anordnungen. Februar 1925 bis Januar 1933, vol. 2(2), Munich, 1992. Doc. 245.
The British rulers also used the idea of a distinct Aryan race in order to ally British power with the Indian caste system. Darwin’s natural selection was a child of British imperial policy. Let me explain. According to Blavatsky, the Hindus, mild, patient, long-suffering, whose very apathy saved the British from being driven out of the country in 1857, would raise their hundred millions of devotees as one man, in reaction to a religious desecration; regardless of sects or castes, they would exterminate every Christian. The East India Company knew this well and built her stronghold on the friendship of the Brahmans, and by paying subsidy to the pagodas the British Government was as prudent as its predecessors. It was the castes, and non-inference with the prevailing religions, that secured its comparative authority in India. And the idea of castes was founded on the premise of karsati i.e. natural selection. Darwin was saving the “pearl in the crown” of the British Empress. Brahminism became the religion of the British upper classes (Cp. the Boston Brahmins) with its merciless extermination principle of the weaker peoples. The Hindu Brahmins became Darwin's “Favoured Race” “preserved by their ascendancy and their privileges through all conquests, dynasties and governments for 2,500 years” (Will Durant, Our Oriental Heritage.1954, p.487)
Caste cannot preserve a nonexistent "racial purity”
Some have dug a biological trench in defence of the Caste System. It is said that the object of Caste was to preserve purity of race and purity of blood. Now ethnologists are of the opinion that men of pure race exist nowhere and that there has been a mixture of all races in all parts of the world. Especially is this the case with the people of India. Mr. D. R. Bhandarkar in his paper on "Foreign Elements in the Hindu Population" has stated that "There is hardly a class or Caste in India which has not a foreign strain in it. There is an admixture of alien blood not only among the warrior classes—the Rajputs and the Marathas—but also among the Brahmins who are under the happy delusion that they are free from all foreign elements." The Caste system cannot be said to have grown as a means of preventing the admixture of races, or as a means of maintaining purity of blood. (Dr. Ambedkar, The Annihililation of Caste) Well, Darwin married his first cousin to preserve his “blue blood” intact and paid a terrible price for it.
Manly P. Hall, 33° Freemason wrote "The adoration of the sun was one of the earliest and most natural forms of religious expression. Complex modern theologies are merely involvement's and amplifications of this simple ... belief. The primitive mind, recognizing the beneficent power of the solar orb, adored it as the proxy of the Supreme Deity ... Among all the nations of antiquity, altars, mounds, and temples were dedicated to the worship of the orb of day ... The Tower of Babel ... was probably an astronomical observatory ... The sun, as supreme among the celestial bodies to the astronomers of antiquity, was assigned to the highest of the gods and became symbolic of the supreme authority of the Creator Himself ... Yellow is his color and his power is without end ... The sun thus became a Bull in Taurus and was worshipped as such by the Egyptians under the name of Apis, and by the Assyrians as Bel, Baal, or Bul (John Bull! –rp). In Leo, the sun became a Lion-slayer, Hercules, and an Archer in Sagittarius. In Pices the Fishes, he was a fish -- Dagon, or Vishnu, the fish-god of the Philistines and Hindoos." "The Secret Teachings of All Ages". Indeed, heliocentrism and evolutionism are two pillars the Cosmic Religion inaugurated by the rebellious Nimrod and epitomized by its modern Genesis or Big Namg theory.
Thomas Wilson, Curator of Department of Prehistoric Anthropology, U.S. National Museum in his rare book The Swastika wrote: “Many theories have been presented concerning the symbolism of the Swastika, its relation to ancient deities and its representation of certain qualities. In the estimation of certain writers it has been respectively the emblem of Zeus, of Baal, of the sun, of the sun-god, of the sun-chariot of Agni the fire-god, of Indra the rain-god, of the sky, the sky-god, and finally the deity of all deities, the great God, the Maker and Ruler of the Universe…It is believed by some to have been the oldest Aryan symbol. In the estimation of others it represents Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva, Creator, Preserver, Destroyer.”
“I am still inclined to the notion that Swastika may, at the same time, have been looked upon in some cases as a cross – that is, a pre-Christian cross, which now finds acceptance by some authorities as representing the four cardinal points. The importance of the cardinal points in primitive symbolism appears to me to have been very great, and has not as yet been fully realized. This is too large a matter to deal with here. All I can state is, that the wheel in India was connected with the title of a Chakravartin – from Charkra, a wheel – the title meaning a supreme ruler, or a universal monarch (cp. one world system), who ruled the four quarters of the world, and on his coronation he had to drive his chariot, or wheel, to the four cardinal points to signify his conquest of them…From instances such as these, I am inclined to assume that the Swastika, as a cross, represented the four quarters over which the solar power by its revolving motion carried its influence.” (pp. 770, 791)
The ancient Vedic seers described the original cosmic creative process as “the churning of the milky ocean” whereby fields of subtle substance become condensed into gross matter; a view that is now widely accepted today in energy-field physics research. The Brownian movement is also a miniature replica of “the churning of the milky ocean.” This “churning” is represented geometrically in Tantric ritual as a four armed cross within a circle and the cross is meant to be imagined as oscillating backwards and forwards as in a churning motion. The forward movement marked by right-angled break of the arms of the cross is towards evolution while the left-angled break marks movement towards dissolution. The circle represents the universe in its potential un-manifested state prior to creation and is called in Hinduism “Brahmanda”. The churning also brought the Lakshmi forth from the ocean. It should be reminded in this context that the Greek goddess Venus was believed to be born out of the sea foam.
Darwinists' “Lakhshmi” called Bathybius Haeckelii
In the 1860s, upon the release of Darwin's book, there was much speculation centred on the 'primordial slime' from which life 'first arose' inspired by Darwin's “Little, warm pond”. Ernst Haeckel, a very influential German zoology professor, had even invented a whole family of creatures to fill the gap between non-living slime and one-celled organisms. Drawings and descriptions of these so-called 'Monera', ill-defined blobs of 'protoplasm' without a nucleus, seemed convincing. After no such creatures were found on land, the sea bottom was considered as their possible hiding place. Accordingly, British ships began sampling sea floor sediment. In 1868, one such set of samples contained slimy blobs that generated much excitement among evolutionists. Huxley declared that these were samples of the 'real thing', and even gave them a taxonomic name—Bathybius Haeckeli.However, a few years later, Bathybius was quietly withdrawn from the spotlight. The reason? It turned out that Bathybius ppeared whenever large quantity of spirits of wine was [oured into a bottle containing some pure seawater. It was the chemical precipitate of the sulphate of lime produced by the mixture of alcohol and seawater. A ridiculous error and a ridiculous credulity were the direct results of theoretical preconceptions. Bathybius was accepted because it was in harmony with Darwin's soaring speculations.
Killing your enemy, is central to Brahminism be it the Gita or the Puranas
“Many scholars such as Kant and Herder, began to draw analogies between the myths and philosophies of ancient India and the West. In their attempt to separate Western culture from its Judaic heritage, many scholars were convinced that the origin of Western culture was to be found in India rather than in the ancient Near East.” In the opinion of the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world.
Racism and genocide: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.... The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.” Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 1871, chapter 6. Before 1859 (before Darwin's Origin), many scientists had questioned whether blacks were of the same species as whites, but they had no scientific basis for that notion. Things changed once Darwin presented his racist evolutionary schema. Darwin stated that African-Americans could not survive competition with their white near-relations, let alone being able to compete with the white race. According to Darwin, the African was inferior because he represented the missing-link" between ape and Teuton.
In his book Greater Britain, Dilke had written:
“In America we have seen the struggle of the dear races against the cheap--the endeavors of the English to hold their own against the Irish and Chinese. In New Zealand, we found the stronger and more energetic race pushing from the earth the shrewd and laborious descendants of the Asian Malays; in Australia, the English triumphant, and the cheaper races excluded from the soil not by distance merely, but by arbitrary legislation; in India, we saw the solution of the problem by the officering of the cheaper by the dearer race. Everywhere, we have found that the difficulties which impede the progress to universal dominion of the English people lie in the conflict with the cheaper races. The result of our survey is such as to give us reason for the belief that race distinctions will long continue, that miscegenation will go but a little way towards blending races, that the dearer are on the whole likely to destroy the cheaper peoples and that Saxondom will rise triumphant from the doubtful struggle.'' Darwinism proclaimed the triumph of the favoureud races over the cheaper people.
“Jews Are the Cheaper, Mongrel People”
The following is an excerpt from a Palestinian history textbook: “The Philistines, who came from Crete and Asia Minor, merged with the Canaanites, who originated from the Arabian peninsula, and gave the land is name, Falastin. The Jebusites, a Canaanite people, are the ancestors of the Palestinians. Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but a “believer in one God.” The twelve sons of Jacob fled to Egypt, interbred with the Egyptians there and became numerous. Moses and his followers wandered in the desert; they were not endowed with any scientific or artistic talents and made no cultural achievements whatsoever…” That explains why the Egyptian journalist Musa Sabri called Arafat a “corrupt war criminal” “clown of every circus” and a treacherous bloodsucker.
It is shocking that the so-called New Israel Fund(NIF) which receives much of its money from the Ford Foundation disburses millions of dollars annually to 16 Israeli NGOs that collaborated with the UN Human Rights Council and Richard Goldstone to bring about the establishment of the Goldstone committee and give credibility to its allegations that Israel committed war crimes during Operation Cast Lead. These renegades are seduced by Aryan Secular Science and hate the God of the Bible. Henry Ford in the 1920s published ill-famous The International Jew which inspired the recent The Israel Lobby.
To Goebbels, Hitler, Himmler and others, including certain Theologians of the time, the Old Testament was also seen as inferior as the Jews were seen as an inferior and 'past' race. Himmler's favorite book was, of course, the Bhagavat Gita...
Knesset Members Study Torah
Shevat 25, 5770, 09 February 10 11:13. by Arutz Sheva
In a special Tuesday session of the House of Torah Study for Knesset Members, headed by Education and Culture Committee Chairman Zevulun Orlev, leaders from the Jewish Federation of New York took part in Torah study with Knesset members. They studies the importance of contributing to society.
The Palestinian authors were inspired by these passages from A. Hitler’s “Mein Kampf”: “…What we see before us of human culture today, the results of art, science, and techniques, is almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan.” (…) “The Jew forms the strongest contrast to the Aryan.’’(…) “The Jewish person, with all its apparent intellectual qualities, is nevertheless without any true culture, especially without a culture of its own. For the sham culture which the Jew possesses today is the property of other peoples, and is mostly spoiled in his hands. When judging Jewry in its attitude towards the question of human culture, one has to keep before one’s eyes as an essential characteristic that there never has been and consequently that today also there is no Jewish art; that above all the two queens of all arts, architecture and music, owe nothing original to Jewry. What he achieves in the field of art is either bowdlerization or intellectual theft. With this, the Jew lacks those qualities which distinguish creatively and, with it, culturally blessed races.’’
Using the Big Gun of Evolution against Jewish People
The first lobbying effort on behalf of a Jewish state in Palestine was not organized or initiated by Jews. It occurred in 1891, when a popular fundamentalist Christian writer and lay-preacher, William E. Blackstone, organized a national campaign to appeal to the then-president of the United States, Benjamin Harrison, to support the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. Blackstone gained notoriety through his 1882 national bestseller Jesus is Coming, his summary of end-of-time premillennial doctrines. He saw a need to politically support the Jewish people after hearing horrifying stories of the pogroms in Russia. Blackstone appealed to multimillionaire friends such as oil magnate John D. Rockefeller, publisher Charles B. Scribner and industrialist JP Morgan to finance advertisements and a petition campaign that were carried in major newspapers from Boston to the Mississippi. Aside from wealthy financiers, Blackstone also received support from most members of the US Senate and House of Representatives and the chief justice of the Supreme Court. Despite powerful backing, his appeal went nowhere. If Brahminism was the Religion, Judaism had to be degraded as a superstition concocted by a backward people whose minds were truly “childish”.
There is little record of significant political backing for the Zionist cause after Blackstone's initiative, as fundamentalists began to withdraw from political activity following the Scopes trial and battles over evolution.
An American version of Dr. Ambedkar's The Annihilation of Caste is Eugene Givenchy's the End of Darwinismwhich exposes all the hoaxes and political maneuvering to secure the final triumph of Darwin's hypothesis. Thomas Huxley known also as Darwin's bloody-fanged bulldog one of the 9-member “politbiuro” which worked hard to preserve Darwin's legacy observed: "You have no notion of the intrigue that goes on in this blessed world of science. Science is, I fear, no purer than any other region of human activity; though it should be."
Indeed, In the most revealing chapter about The Scopes Monkey Trial and Hollywood's Bible-mocking movie "Inherit the Wind," the author exposed the intrigue about the Trial of the Century concocted by the “Gang of Four”: Scopes never taught evolution and never took the stand. His students were tutored to commit perjury. And William Jennings Bryan held his own against the atheist Darrow in the transcript of the trial. Nobody knows anymore what Darwinism is really all about. God won't be mocked.
According to The New Age Dictionary. A Guide to Planetary Family Consciousness. Ed. By Alex Jack. (Japan Publications, Inc. 1990), Charles Darwin was “evolutionist who played a bassoon for his plants.” Like a Hindu Jugglers described by Blavatsky.

Continuing Scientific Legacy of the Nazi Germany

Aryan Science and the Jewish Holocaust
Big Bang theory referred to as Modern “Genesis” retired the Biblical Genesis because the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske imparted to the enthusiastic audiences his conviction that the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world. Oliver Stone in his laterst documentary series "Secret History of America" is rehabilitating Hitler and Stalin as typical scape goats of public opinion. In fact, the director argues they were both products of their historical period. Let me add here that Philosopher M. Polanyi observed, “Newtonian physics and Darwin’s notion of the survival of the fittest were key elements both in the Marxist concepts of class warfare and of racial philosophies which shaped Hitlerism and scientific world view.” Logically, we may expect that another Jewish Holocaust is unavoidable and it will be a product of John Paul II's rehabilitation of Criminal “Science.”
U.S. Envoy to Ukraine Slams Jews for Holocaust and Communism
The Chicago Tribune reported, ‘And official U.S. delegation sent to Ukraine’s recent presidential inauguration of Yushchenko included a Ukrainian-American who has accused Jews of manipulating the Holocaust for their gain and playing an “inordinate role” in the rise of Soviet communism.”
Myron Kuropas was selected by the White House to fly to Ukraine with then-Secretary of State Colin Powell as part of the American delegation. Mr. Kuropas wrote in 2000, “Big money drives the Holocaust industry. To survive, the Holocaust industry is always searching for its next mark. Ukraine’s turn is just around the corner.” He has argued elsewhere that Jews played a driving role behind Soviet leader Joseph Stalin’s murderous policies in Ukraine. Mr. Kuropas has demonstrated his hostility towards Jews for some time. Michael Kotzin, executive vice president of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, explained to the Chicago Tribune, “This is not new stuff…if you go back over the decades, he’s taken these kinds of positions highly antagonistic to the Jewish people and Jewish interests and causes.”
The Knight Ridder news service confirmed “three State Department officials said the delegation was assembled by the White House.”
“It is astounding that on the eve of commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps, President Bush’s staff would not even bother to look into Kuropas’ regular attacks on Jews and what he terms the ‘Holocaust industry before sending him to Ukraine with our Secretary of State, to represent the United States of America,’ said National Jewish Democratic Council Executive Director Ira N. Forman. This deeply embarrassing incident shows a lack of judgment on the part of the White House and, frankly, a lack of basic competence,” Forman added.
Israel Supports Russia’s Efforts to Preserve Truth about World War Two
URL: http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/111616-israel_russia-0, 12.01.2010
Israeli newspaper Maariv reported that Israeli President Shimon Peres played a significant role in recent Russian-American agreement regarding Europe-based missile defense shield system. In his phone conversations with Obama and during their personal meetings he insisted that abandoning the idea of basing missile defense in Europe was necessary. Why did he have to make efforts that would result in strengthening of Russia’s positions?
Avigdor Eskin, Israeli political analyst, shared his comments on the matter:
“The decision of OSCE that equates Soviet soldiers with Nazi monsters, revengeful attitudes and encouragement of a new wave of Nazism at the state level in Ukraine and Baltic countries, along with the USA’s intentions to locate missile defense near the Russian borders, is a new and dangerous round of attempts to destabilize the situation in the region. It is also an attempt to try new methods in shaping borders and spheres of influence.
The specific role that Israel took up in its eagerness to persuade Obama’s administration not to aggravate a conflict reflects the state strategy of Israel. In recent years, Peres revisited his old role of a recognized master of diplomacy. It is not surprising that he started the project of preventing basing a missile defense shield system in Poland and the Czech Republic and went through with it.
The question of the reasoning behind Israel’s attempt to stop the spread of the American influence in the former CIS countries is very appropriate. The processes associated with the attempts to create a blockade situation for Russia and build a new order in the region do not coincide with Israel’s interests.
In order to understand the essential differences between the interests of Israel and the USA in the post-Soviet region, let us imagine a possible continuation of Bush’s policy. Active revival of Nazism in Ukraine and the Baltic countries at some point started to gain momentum. Americans came to a conclusion that there was nothing good they could expect from these nations and that the only choice the said nations had was between the color of red (getting close with Russia), and the color of brown.
Washington considers the second option to be the lesser evil. A US ambassador in Kiev personally awarded graduates of the Security Service of Ukraine with stripes knowing very well that he was encouraging the supporters of the Nazi ideology. The Academy was recently named after Shukhevych, the leader of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. The US Department of State and CIA not only condone the spirit of revengefulness in Ukraine and in the Baltic countries, but consciously encourage it guided by the intentions not to allow Russia to return to these lands.
A possibility of further unification and consolidation of Ukraine and the Baltic countries on the basis of rehabilitation and revival of Nazism is encouraged externally by similar tendencies in Romania that can spread to Moldavia up to an attempt of aggression against Transdniestria.
Yet, as it often happens with the Americans, their fosterlings have a tendency to get out of control. It cannot be ruled out that these post-Soviet tendencies will become the third power in Europe between the liberal West and Russia.
Israel is concerned with the American project in Eastern Europe because the Russophobia implanted there is immediately interwoven with Judaeophobia. Regardless of instantaneous rewards that can be tempting for the Israeli government, the spread of Nazism across the post-Soviet territory will always remain a direct threat not only for Jewish communities, but for Israel itself.
As for Russia, today it serves as a stabilizer not only in the Western regions of the former USSR, but also in the Caucuses and Central Asia.If we look at separatist tendencies within Russia from Jerusalem, we will come to a conclusion that any scenario of Russia’s separation or collapse would cause strengthening of the anti-Israeli forces.
All these tendencies are dangerous for Israel. The enhancement of a popular attitude suggesting that every national group that declares itself a nation should create an independent country is also dangerous. “Right for a state” is a direct result of the liberal view of the world currently selectively used by the West, promoting double standards. In the context of the Israeli-Russian relations, the struggle against the attempts to falsify the history of World War II is particularly important.
Mocking and hypocritical decision of OSCE that equated Soviet soldiers with killer monsters removed the scales from eyes of many Russians, revealing the real face of Western politicians who followed their Baltic colleagues. The basis for claims against Russia by Baltic revenge seekers and other supporters of Nazis is being prepared. Israel is concerned with these tendencies . Dr. Yehuda Bauer, a leading Israeli historian and scholar of the Holocaust, fiercely rebuffed historians revising the history.
At a special meeting in Yad Vashem, Israeli memorial for Holocaust remembrance, devoted to the 70th anniversary of Molotov - Ribbentrop Pact, he paid special attention to the attempts of the history falsification. He said that World War II had its liberators, Russian soldiers. He stated that while someone may not appreciate the Soviet regime, it had nothing to do with the fact that the Germans were the occupants and monsters, while Russian soldiers were the heroes and liberators.
In other words, the attempts to re-write World War II history are directed both against Israel and Russia, hence mutual interests. It is now up to those who govern in Jerusalem and Moscow. Peres’s success in preventing American missile defense shield system based in Eastern Europe is a great example for cooperation. Will Russian leaders be wise enough to act in compliance with the real geopolitical vectors? Will they be able to promote real interests of our peoples or will they continue encouraging the liberalization processes, entropy and territorial concessions?”
Avigdor Eskin , Pravda.Ru
LifeSiteNews.com Tuesday September 12, 2006
Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: “Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution”
Regensburg, Germany, September 12, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com This morning Pope Benedict XVI discussed evolution in his homily at the outdoor Mass celebrated in Islinger Field. In a direct attack on the concept of random chance evolution, Pope Benedict asked rhetorically: “What came first? Creative Reason, the Spirit who makes all things and giveth them growth, or Unreason, which, lacking any meaning, yet somehow brings forth a mathematically ordered cosmos, as well man and his reson.”
The Pope explained that the belief in God as Creator comes in the most ancient profession of faith known to Christians, The Apostle's Creed. “As Christians, we say: I believe in God the Father, the Creator of heaven and earth – I believe in the creator Spirit. We believe that at the beginning of everything is the eternal Word, with Reason and not Unreason,” he said.
Polish scientists fight creationism:
"No Reasonable Scientist Denies the Theory of Evolution"
autor: PAP, ar, 2006-10-19, Ostatnia aktualizacja
The Senate of the Warsaw Universirty declared just two weeks after the Pope's statement in Regensburg. The theory of evolution is commonly accepted by the scientists and it makes no sense to put it vis-a-vis creationism because creationism is no Science, said the spokesman of the Warsaw University. This statement was a reaction to the enunciations of politicians who maintained that evolution should not be taught in schools. In other words, unlike John Paul II, this Pope is no Reasonable Scientist. The opposition of Polish authorities to the German Pope materialized in the decision to build a Centre of Science Kopernik in Warsaw.
Nature 443, 890-891 (26 October 2006)
Almut Graebsch
Abstract
Deputy education minister calls evolution a 'lie'.
Fifty leading scientists in Poland have signed an open letter in protest against an aggressive anti-evolution campaign launched by the League of Polish Families (LPR), the ultra-right-wing coalition partner in the conservative Polish government."The theory of evolution is a lie," Mirosaw Orzechowski, Poland's deputy education minister, told the newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza on 14 October.
Atheists of All Countries Unite
In November 2006 a new Center for Inquiry held its inaugural press conference in Washington, D.C. Its aim? To “promote and defend reason, science, and freedom of inquiry in all areas of human endeavor.” This was deemed necessary because of the resurgence of fundamentalist religions across the nation, and their alliance with political-ideological movements to block science.” Prominent scientists signed a declaration lamenting the “persistence of paranormal and occult beliefs” and “retreat into mysticism.” Their contention was that public policies should be shaped by secular values (i.e. by atheistic values) and that science and secularism are “inextricably linked.” If they are, and if Richard Dawkins (b. 1941) is right to regard the existence of God as a vulnerable “scientific hypothesis”, it seems reasonable to assert that scientific progress has been the prinicapl cause of secularization.
Evangelist D. James Kennedy’s Florida-based television and radio organization, Coral Ridge Ministries, has produced a TV documentary and a book linking the Holocaust to the theory of evolution. Called Darwin’s Deadly Legacy, the documentary aired Aug. 26-27 on Christian cable networks and about 200 television stations across the country. It is now being sold on DVD along with the companion book, Evolution’s Fatal Fruit: How Darwin’s Tree of Life Brought Death to Millions. Both describe the Nazis’ embrace of eugenics and social Darwinism, their attempt to build a master race and to justify racism, slavery and even murder as survival of the fittest.
In 2006, the National Religious Broadcasters association inducted Kennedy into its Hall of Fame. As a result of a heart attack from which he never fully recovered, Kennedy last preached at Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church later that year, on December 24, 2006. His retirement was officially announced at the church on August 26, 2007.
Atheist clubs are springing up in American high schools,
warns head of US Catholic bishops
by Damian Thompson, Telegraph
Reposted from: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100012851/atheist-clubs-are-springing-up-in-american-high-schools-warns-head-of-us-catholic-bishops/ A “triumphalistic, self-righteous atheism” inspired by the work of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris is winning a following among American young people, leading to “atheist clubs” in high schools, according to Cardinal Francis George of Chicago. The cardinal, who is President of the US Catholic Bishops’ Conference, says that unbelief among young people is more than a question of stopping going to church: it is part of a fashionable “new atheism” which is every bit as intolerant as Christian fundamentalism. He told John Allen of the National Catholic Reporter: “In Chicago, we now have atheist clubs in high schools. We didn’t have those five years ago. Kids I would have confirmed in the eighth grade, by the time they’re sophomores in high school say they’re atheists. They don’t just stop going to church, they make a statement. I think that’s new. That’s perhaps a bit more like Europe.”
YouTube is crawling with videos by articulate, friendly American teenagers and university students proclaiming their uncompromising atheism; indeed, atheism is one of the fastest-growing movements in the 18-25 age group, casting doubt on old assumptions that the religious impulse is somehow hard-wired into the American psyche. (Wednesday, October 7, 2009 )
Making a Monkey Out of Darwin
Pat Buchanan
"You have no notion of the intrigue that goes on in this blessed world of science," wrote Thomas Huxley. "Science is, I fear, no purer than any other region of human activity; though it should be."
As "Darwin's bulldog," Huxley would himself engage in intrigue, deceit and intellectual property theft to make his master's theory gospel truth in Great Britain.
He is quoted above for two reasons.
First is House passage of a "cap-and-trade" climate-change bill. Depending on which scientists you believe, the dire consequences of global warming are inconvenient truths — or a fearmongering scheme to siphon off the wealth of individuals and empower bureaucrats.
The second is publication of "The End of Darwinism: And How a Flawed and Disastrous Theory Was Stolen and Sold," by Eugene G. Windchy, a splendid little book that begins with Huxley's lament.
That Darwinism has proven "disastrous theory" is indisputable.
"Karl Marx loved Darwinism," writes Windchy. "To him, survival of the fittest as the source of progress justified violence in bringing about social and political change, in other words, the revolution."
"Darwin suits my purpose," Marx wrote. Darwin suited Adolf Hitler's purposes, too.
"Although born to a Catholic family Hitler become a hard-eyed Darwinist who saw life as a constant struggle between the strong and the weak. His Darwinism was so extreme that he thought it would have been better for the world if the Muslims had won the eighth century battle of Tours, which stopped the Arabs' advance into France. Had the Christians lost, (Hitler) reasoned, Germanic people would have acquired a more warlike creed and, because of their natural superiority, would have become the leaders of an Islamic empire."
Charles Darwin also suited the purpose of the eugenicists and Herbert Spencer, who preached a survival-of-the-fittest social Darwinism to robber baron industrialists exploiting 19th-century immigrants.
For 150 years, the fossil record has failed to validate Darwin. ((On 22 October 1996John paul said"...les nouvelles connaissances conduisent a reconnaitre dans la theorie de l'evolution plus qu'une hypothese", which means that the Pope lied -rp)
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontologists," admitted Stephen J. Gould in 1977. But that fossil record now contains even more species that appear fully developed, with no traceable ancestors.
Darwin ruled out such "miracles."
And Darwinists still have not explained the origin of life, nor have they been able to produce life from non-life.
The most delicious chapter is Windchy's exposure of the Scopes Monkey Trial and Hollywood's Bible-mocking movie "Inherit the Wind," starring Spencer Tracy as Clarence Darrow.
The trial was a hoked-up scam to garner publicity for Dayton, Tenn. Scopes never taught evolution and never took the stand. His students were tutored to commit perjury. And William Jennings Bryan held his own against the atheist Darrow in the transcript of the trial.
In 1981, Gould had this advice for beleaguered Darwinists: "Perhaps we should all lie low and rally round the flag of strict Darwinism ... a kind of old-time religion on our part." Exactly. Darwinism is not science. It is faith. Always was.
Patrick Buchanan, former White House Chief of Staff during Reagan presidency, a catholic is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
The End of Darwinism:The Cover-Up Gets Underway
by Eugene G. Windchy
After a conference of 160 biologists rejected Darwinism in 1980, Harvard University’s famous evolutionary biologist Stephen J. Gould declared the theory “dead” in a scientific journal. In 1981, however, Gould noticed a trend among his colleagues to “mute” debate on theory so as not to encourage the creationists , and he said, “Perhaps we should all lie low and rally around the flag of strict Darwinism—a kind of old time religion on our part.”
As a case in point, in 1999 I was amused to see how Gould rode to the rescue of Darwinism in Kansas, where the state school board voted to let the local school boards decide what to teach about evolution. Apparently outraged by this attack on the Darwinists’ united front, Gould wrote for Time magazine an essay titled, “Dorothy, It’s Really Oz.” In it the Harvard professor skillfully ridiculed the Kansas plan and he eloquently defended evolution as fact—without ever mentioning Darwin or his theory…In effect, Gould defended textbook Darwinism, which he had declared “dead,” while not saying a word about it.
Sitting in Cambridge, Massachusetts, did Gould know what exactly he was defending in Kansas (maybe that [fraudulent] giraffe?). I could not find out. Wanting to obtain a list of the state’s biology books, I telephoned long distance to the Kansas School Board, and a very uncooperative employee told me I would have to ask the individual schools—as if the board did not know what books it had authorized. The telephone company helped me to reach a high school, where a panicky biology teacher demanded, “Why are you singling me out?” Nothing would persuade the man to let me know what biology books were being used in his school.How did public education get to be secret education? Sir Walter Scott understood that sort of thing. In his familiar words, “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive.”
Eugene G. Windchy in 1967 left his position as the U.S. Information Agency’s Assistant Science Adviser to investigate the forgotten naval incidents that enabled United States participation in the Vietnam War. This led to his writing Tonkin Gulf, which was reviewed in the New York Times as "superb investigative reporting" (September 26, 1971).
Windchy wrote the New Republic’s analysis of the Pentagon Papers (August 7, 1971) and other articles for the Nation, Saturday Review, Atlantic, and the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. In another New Republic article (January 29, 1972) Windchy contested the settled academic opinion, among both historians and political scientists, that the president has constitutional authority to make war without the nation’s having been attacked. Windchy drew upon James Madison’s notes concerning the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to show that, in the absence of attack, only the Congress has the right to initiate war. He also debunked a State Department document that purported to show that on 125 occasions presidents had exercised the war power on their own initiative. These were insignificant incidents, and on one occasion the U.S. Navy actually fired on a U.S. Consulate.
Pope Benedict XVI Enlists the Help of Russian Scientists
Scientific Conference Refuting Evolution Theory to be held in Rome, Italy
The Scientific Impossibility of Evolution
November 9, 2009 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. St. Pius V University (Rome)
In Response to Pope Benedict XVI’s Call for Both Sides to be Heard
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - OCTOBER 16, 2009
The Scientific Revolution started dominating accounts of the past only after the Second Warld War, when historians optimistically (and unrealistically) predicted that science would provide a universal, secular faith to unite the world. Thomas Kuhn's name symbolizes current views that science lurches unpredictable, a fallible human endeavor swayed like any other by local influences, personal interests, and political pressures.
The 150th anniversary of Darwin’s "Origin of the Species" in November 2009 was the occasion for a unique conference at Pope Pius V University in Rome presenting a scientific refutation of evolution theory. According to Russian sedimentologist Alexander Lalamov, “Everything contained in Darwin’s Origin of Species depends upon rocks forming slowly over enormous periods of time. The November conference demonstrates with empirical data that such geological time is not available for evolution.” Recently returned from a ground-breaking geological conference in Kazan, sedimentologist Guy Berthault will present the findings of several sedimentological studies conducted and published in Russia. In one of these, the age of the rock formation surveyed was found to be 0.01% of the age attributed to it by the geological time-scale—instead of an age of 10 million years, the actual age was no more than one thousand years. “Contrary to the conventional wisdom,” Lalamov observed, “these rocks formed quickly, and the fossils they contain must be relatively young. This finding contradicts the evolutionary interpretation of the fossil record.” www.sedimentology.fr
According to US biophysicist Dr. Dean Kenyon, “Biological macroevolution collapses without the twin pillars of the geological time-scale and the fossil record as currently interpreted. Few scientists would contest this statement. This is why the upcoming conference concentrates on geology and paleontology. Recent research in these two disciplines adds powerful support to the already formidable case against teaching Darwinian macroevolution as if it were proven fact.”
Polish Scientists Strike Back
www.tehrantimes.com, Monday Jan. 11, 2010
4-legged animals emerged earlier than thought
LONDON (AP) -- The water-dwelling ancestors of modern-day mammals, reptiles and birds emerged onto land millions of years earlier than previously believed, researchers reported. A set of fossilized footprints show that the first tetrapods — a term applied to any four-footed animal with a spine — were treading open ground 397 million years ago, well before scientists thought they existed. An expert unconnected with the research said the find would force experts to reconsider a critical period in evolution when sea-based vertebrates took their first steps toward becoming dinosaurs, mammals and — eventually — human beings. “It blows the whole story out of the water, so to speak,” said Jenny Clack, a paleontologist at Cambridge University. Until now, scientists thought they had the evolution from fin to foot fairly well understood. The earliest tetrapods had been traced to 385 million years ago. Experts theorized that they had split from their close relatives, a fleshy-finned family of fish, a few million years earlier and then gone on to conquer land. But the new fossil footprints — uncovered between 2002 and 2007 in a disused quarry in central Poland — push the timing back by several million years, according to Grzegorz Pienkowski, the scientific director of the Polish Geological Institute in Warsaw, where most of the article's authors are based. He said the fossils had been securely dated from the deposits they were found with. Although at least some of the footprints may have been made in shallow water, paleontologist Per Ahlberg, one of the article's co-authors, said it was nevertheless clear from the shape of the toe prints and the nature of the sediment that the animals spent time walking around on land. “We know from the site that you have rain drop prints and mud cracks in the sediment,” he said, noting also that the prints appeared far too crisp to have been made underwater. The find also challenges the commonly accepted notion that tetrapods colonized the surface from lakes or river beds. Ahlberg and his colleagues argued that the footprints were first created in what was probably a lagoon-like environment at the time, adding that a coastal location made sense because shifting tides could strand small marine animals, giving our fishy forebears an incentive to explore open land.
Although she acknowledged their importance, Clack warned against drawing conclusions exclusively on small marks left by animals on the bottom of a muddy surface hundreds of millions of years ago. She said it would be critical to see fossil evidence of the creature that made the footprints before coming to any definitive conclusion on exactly how, when and where vertebrates came to colonize the earth's surface. She said some theorized that tetrapods originally went ashore to lay their eggs out of reach of water-going predators or that their ancestors grew legs to scurry from pool to pool. She said she had personally favored the notion that fish emerged from oxygen-deprived waters in order, quite literally, to catch their breath. All those theories were called into question by the Polish find, she said. It wouldn't be logical for fish to lay their eggs in a place where the tide would wash right over them, for example, and the pool-hopping behavior wouldn't make sense in a coastal environment. As for her oxygen hypothesis, Clack said “that's probably out the window.” The fossils suggested that tetrapods evolved well before marine oxygen levels started to drop, she said. Ahlberg said paleontologists were already scouring the area for more evidence of footprints — and fossils of the animals themselves. “Obviously the hunt is on,” he said.
In 2000 the British magazine New Scientist devoted a cover story urging readers to “Start Worrying Now” because “From Kansas to Korea, Creationism is Flooding the earth.” Although this development seemed almost “beyond belief”, the magazine described creationism as “mutating and spreading” around the world even linking up with the like-minded people in the Muslim world.” Just five years later representatives from national academies of science around the world joined in signing a statement supporting evolution and condemning the global spread of “theories not testable by science.” Contrary to all expectations, geographical theologial, and political barriers had utterly failed to contain what had begun as a distinctively American movement to create a Bible-based alternative to evolution. Did the Superpower, like the Soviet Union contain it? Where is the Soviet Union? God won't be mocked! Can Poland win the battle, the Soviet Union lost?
Zaginęło dwóch geologów. Wielkie poszukiwania
bdc 2010-01-10, ostatnia aktualizacja 2010-01-10 16:00:02.0
On January 10, 2010 the Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza reported that a black Nissan patrol with two Polish geologists Patelski Piotr – 26-year-old and his 23-year-old colleague disappeared from the face of the earth. On January 13, the choppers of border guard found the car in the river Narew. They continue looking for their bodies, or for their footprints, which, according to their belief, will stay as the proof of their existence for millions of years.
January 12, 2010. Italian Vaticanist Andrea Tornielli has published unedited material in his latest book on John Paul II, titled “Santo Subito” or “Immediate Saint”. In the book, he discloses never before heard testimonies, from those who knew John Paul II best. Tornielli hopes to shed some light on what made John Paul II a powerful figure.Andrea TornielliAuthor “Santo Subito”"He spoke with God. You would take one look at him and you knew that he was a person who talked frequently with God.” The book includes unedited episodes throughout his pontificate. For example, the times he would break protocol to visit with ill patients. On one occasion he received a patient in his private chapel who wanted to see him, even though the patient had not made a formal request.
The Pope has blood on his hands
The Pope did great damage to the church, and to countless Catholics
Terry Eagleton - Monday April 4, 2005 The Guardian
Terry Eagleton, professor of cultural theory at Manchester University in his Special report for Guardian Unlimited wrote: “John Paul acknowledged equality with nobody. From his early years as a priest, he was notable for his exorbitant belief in his own spiritual and intellectual powers. Graham Greene once dreamed of a newspaper headline reading “John Paul canonises Jesus Christ” Bishops were summoned to Rome to be given their orders, not for fraternal consultation. Loopy far-right mystics and Francoists were honoured, and Latin American political liberationists bawled out. The Pope's authority was so unassailable that the head of a Spanish seminary managed to convince his students that he had the Pope's personal permission to masturbate them. Marco Politi, Vatican correspondent for “La Repubblica, in his book La Confesione (2001) disclosed a network of gay priests throughout Italy. Well, the pedophile priests in the United States never were sent to a prison; they just paid for their perversions. Roman Polanski did the same, yet the US justice wants to put him into prison. He is Jewish and that explains his predicament.
John Paul II's “Fittest Man”
Reports that Pope John Paul II made an appeal to the British government for the release of Augusto Pinochet “for humanitarian reasons” provoked outrage from human rights groups and relatives of the victims of Pinochet's murderous regime in Chile. Vatican spokesman Joaquin Navarro Valls confirmed that the Pope had interceded on hehalf of the former Chilean dictator.
In Chile an organization representing relatives of the “disappeared” published an open letter to the Pope declaring, “The Catholic Church cannot teach that to kill, to disappear and to torture thousands of oppositionists can be crimes that are left unpunished.”
In Argentina, the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, the most prominent organization of relatives of the tens of thousands of victims of that country's military dictatorship of the 1970s and early 1980s, went further, accusing John Paul II of “defending assassins.”
“We address you as a common citizen, because it appears aberrant to us from the Papal throne in the Vatican, without knowing nor having suffered the electric prods, the mutilations, rapes, you decide, in the name of Jesus Christ, to ask clemency for the murderer,” read the letter that the group gave to the Papal Nuncio in Buenos Aires.
“Jesus was crucified and his flesh was lacerated by the Judases who like you today defended the assassins,” it continued.
In 1991, after the leaders of the militrary junta had been found guilty of political mass murder, torture and other crimes and susequently pardoned by Peronist President Carlos Menem, they joined him as guests of honor at a reception held by the Vatican's representative in Buenos Aires marking the thirteenthg anniversary of Wojtyla's ascension to the Papal throne. Http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/mar1999/pope-m04.shtml
Pinichet's Victims Museum
Chile is gearing up for a presidential run-off next Sunday after neither top candidate clinched a definitive win in the first round of voting.
Independent candidate Sebastian Pinera, a conservative billionaire, is in the lead at present against former president Eduardo Frei.It is the largest show of support an independent candidate has seen in recent history. The two main candidates faced off in a televised debate late on Monday as their campaigns reach the final stretch.
At the centre of that debate was Chile's human-rights record. Some of Pinera's conservative supporters are known to have backed Augusto Pinochet's iron rule decades ago.
Amid this flurry of political activity, a new memorial museum is opening this week in Santiago, the capital, a project led personally by Michelle Bachelet, the current president.
The museum is a tribute to tens of thousands of victims, who like herself, suffered under Pinochet's rule. The Museum, like Yad vaShem, exhibits thousands of photos of the murdered victims.
Al Jazeera's Lucia Newman has this report. esday, January 13, 2010 , 12:54 Mecca time, 09:54 GMT. No other paper in the whole world dared print this piece of news. The UN did not send a Goldstone to investigate these murders.
Roman Pytel, Ph.D. poles4israel
http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/