Brahminical Fascism in the Garb of Palestine

Stubbs, a Puritan of Queen Elizabeth’s days, describing the May-day feasts, says: “And then they fall to banquet and feast, to leape and dance about it,” (the May-pole), “as the heathen people did at the dedication of their idolles, whereof this is a perfect picture, or rather the thing itself.” Stubbs was right: the people of England in the year 1550 A.D., and for years afterward, were celebrating the end of the Drift Age, the disappearance of the darkness and the victory of the sun god i.e. the evolutionary god-in-the-process-of-becoming.
The publication of Copernicus’s “The Revolutions” had an immediate political consequence; it strengthened the claims of all monarchs of Europe to absolute power. Copernicus’s sun sitting on the royal throne and commanding his star family, like a patriarch commands his family, inspired the role of a monarch as Augustus, quasi-divine protector of his countrymen. In the ritualized entertainments of European courts, that theme was stressed from the 1540s by the use of stage sets whose perspective lines emphasized the central position to the audience of the ruler’s throne. Using verse and dance and spectacular transformation scenes, masques allegorically referred to the ruler’s power to tap the harmony of the cosmos and reproduce it on earth.
Shakespeare, or whoever he was immediately embraced the fashionable doctrine of heliocentrism:
The glorious planet Sol
In noble eminence enthroned and spher’d
Amidst the other…
using it to proclaim the glory of the English monarchy, and not the glory of God:
The sun not only is the King of the sky
But he is like the King
And the King is like sun.
The correspondence between God, the Sun and the King is confirmed by the “healing power of the English King” derived from the “med’cinable eye of the Sol.”
Many Christians are aware that the word “Easter” does not occur in the original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. As a matter of fact, the only place it can be found in an English version of the Bible is in the King James Version (Acts 12:4). King James was known as “the wisest fool in Christendom.” Passover and Easter are two different things and that what Acts refers to is the Passover, not “Easter”. Modern versions of the Bible all translate pascha as “Passover.” The word Easter derives from Eastre, a Teutonic goddess of Spring who received offerings in the month of April. (Cp. Hitler’s paganism)
Merneptah Stele of ca. 1210 B.C. also known as the “Israel Stele,” describes the victory of Egyptian king Mernepth over peoples from the west, including “Israel.” It shows that by this time a people known, as “Israel” existed in Canaan. But the KJV translators decided to logjam the historical roots of Israel by smuggling into their “Authorized version” the name Palestina which is not corroborated by archeological or other historical sources. King James Version of Ex 15:14:
The people shall hear, and be afraid; sorrow shall take hold on the inhabitants of Palestina. (Cf. also Is 14:29)
One could say that among the KJV translators a protoplast of the present British leftist Galloway decided to launch his Viva Palestina movement by fraudulent translation of this particular verse, which would suggest that The Promised Land was actually not a Semitic Canaan but Greek (or Aryan) Palestina, a state organized by Greek invaders from the Mediterranean islands of Egypt and Gaza, also known as the Sea People from Egyptian inscriptions. In the Contemporary English Version (New York, 1995) the same verse reads:
Nations learned of this and trembled – Philistines shook with horror.
In other words King James hoaxers identified the biblical Philistines with the name Palestina which was given by Roman Emperor Hadrian in AD 132 to the province of Judea. According to Encyclopedia Britannica: “ The name Palestine is derived from the Greek Palaistina, which comes from the Hebrew Pleshet (Land of the Philistines), referring to a small coastal area northwest of Egypt. The Romans used the term Syria Palestina for the southern third of the province of Syria including the former Judea.” That explains why Mashaal, the political boss of Hamas is residing in Damascus. The name Palestine was revived as an official title for a portion of the territory from the Jordan river westward to the Mediterranean coast of a mandate given to the British after World War I. It was a political rape, because the territory given by the Leage of Nations to the British also encompassed the present Jordan. The British colonial policy of divide et impera was conceived with total contempt for the history of the Middle East, and with contempt for the international policy as mandated by the international organization. The Bible mentions that David conquered also 31 towns west of the Jordan River. The Philistines never ruled these towns.
'What’s the Alternative?' MK Orlev: Jordan is Palestine
(Israelnationalnews.com) Asked to present his alternative to the “two-state” Israel-Palestine option, MK Zevulun Orlev (Jewish Home) says, “The Arabs of the Palestinian Authority already have a state – Jordan.”
A Short History of Philistines
The Aegean peoples were adventurous sailors and traders. In the same year as the XIXth Dynasty pharaoh Merneptah (c. 1224-1211) claimed ‘victories’ in Canaan, he also had to confront a violent combined incursion of Libyans and ‘Peoples of the Sea.’ Philistines or ‘Sea People’, as they are called in the Egyptian documents had originated from Cyprus or Crete, or for the most part, it seems, from south-west Asia Minor (Caria), where their non-Semitic language appears to have originated. The Philistines possessed strong cultural affinities with the Mycenaeans (speaking proto-Greek) whose powerful city-states in Greece were suffering destruction at about this time. Sea Peoples, including apparently the Philistines, had already been settling in Canaan before the time of Ramses III, at the expense of the Canaanites. Ramses III defeated the Philistines, but could not throw them back.
The principal area in which they established themselves was the southern part of the Canaanite coastal plain, a fertile strip forty miles long and fifteen or twenty miles deep, in what is now called the Gaza Strip. The Greeks called this territory and the land east of it Palestine. The Greek name falsifies the historical reality of that area; over the years in which they were settling down in their new homes, the Philistines gradually became assimilated to the civilization of the Canaanites, and presumably intermarried with them as well; even their language was eventually replaced by a local Canaanite dialect. Excavations at Ashdod have shown how many Canaanite elements became blended with their originally non-Semitic way of life. Thus the gods of Aegean origin whom they had brought to the country were given the names of Canaanite deities. These included Dagon – formerly Mesopotamian – who became their chief god, with Ashdod as his main center; Baal, worshipped at Ekron as Baalzebul, the prime (mockingly transformed by the Israelites into Baalzebub, Lord of the Flies); and the goddess Ashtoreth.
The city-states of the Philistines, operating more or less in unison, became increasingly important independent military powers, As time went on, their attempts to expand into the hill country inevitably involved them in open conflict with the Israelite tribes.
The Book of Joshua mentions the land Israel had not yet taken in these words: “First there is the Canaanite territory that starts at the Shihor River just east of Egypt and goes north to Ekron. The southern part of this region belongs to the Avvites and the Geshurites, and the land around Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath, and Ekron belongs to the five Philistine rulers.” (Contemporary English Version, Josh. 13:2-3)
The five Philistine rulers and the thirty-one kings west of the Jordan River never created a single Palestinian state. When David became king of Israel, he subdued the Philistines and forced them to pay tribute. The great civilization sacred to Judaism, Christianity and Islam was created by the Hebrews not Philistines or Canaanites.
The ancient Greek pirates referred to in the Egyptian documents as Sea People behaved exactly like the British imperialists of 19th century: “Gain and hold territories that possess the largest supplies of the basic raw materials. Establish naval bases around the world to control the sea and commerce lanes. Blockade and starve into submission any nation or group of nations that opposes this empire control program.”
Dagon -- a god-in-the-process-of-becoming
Dagon, whom the Philistines borrowed from the Bbaylonians was a exact copy of the Hindu avatar of the god Vishnu Matsya, in the shape of half fish, half man. As such this god expressed visually the perennial Aryan evolutionism taught by Brahman Manu:
"The first germ of life was developed by water and heat" (Manu, book i., sloka 8).
"Water ascends toward the sky in vapors; from the sun it descends in rain, from the rain are born the plants, and from the plants, animals" (book iii., sloka 76).
"Each being acquires the qualities of the one which immediately precedes it, in such a manner that the farther a being gets away from the primal atom of its series, the more he is possessed of qualities and perfections" (book i., sloka 20).
"Man will traverse the universe, gradually ascending, and passing through the rocks, the plants, the worms, insects, fish, serpents, tortoises, wild animals, cattle, and higher animals. . . . Such is the inferior degree" (Ibid.).
And this perennial philosophical evolution was smuggled by KJV hoaxers into their “Authorized Version”. The Hebrew text of Genesis 1: 20 reads:
“Let the waters swarm with swarms of
living creatures and let fowl fly above the earth…”
King James hoaxers translated this verse as follows:
“Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving
creature, and fowl that may fly above the earth…”
They read into this verse the evolutionist dogma of Anaximander who taught that men were first produced in fishes; when they were grown and able to help themselves, were thrown up and so lived upon the land.” The Babylonian priests of the god Dagon (Vishnu) wore on their backs a distinctive garb resembling fish scales and their headgears, or mithras resembled fish mouth.The geometrical design of the hattas or kuffiyehs of the modern Palestinians imitate the design of these Babylonian clerical garbs. The central Sun of the Babylonian myth is a fountain of 'living waters,' healing 'waters' or of healing energy (the Aryan term Brahmah means 'energy'). Ancient wisdom traditions maintain humans, and all other beings in our galaxy, emanate from and share a common home: the Central Sun at the core of our Milky Way galaxy.
In a Sumerian hymn Enki stands at the empty river beds and fills them with his 'water.' Sumerian “a” means water, or semen. The early Christian sect of Naassenes identified Osiris with water. The Argive princess Danae was impregnated by Zeus in the guise of a golden shower (Gold was believed in ancient Egypt to be “flesh of the sun”). Recall in this context that when “one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his (Jesus') side, and forthwith came there out blood and (living) water.” (John 19:33-34)
The name Lingam appears as a name of Shiva in the Shiva Sahasranama where it is translated by Ram Karan Sharma as "(Identifiable as) a symbol of the origin of the Universe. The Christian heretic Justin who envisaged Jesus as ever-existent “seed-sowing Reason” believed that the good God was an erect phallus, like Shiva (Hippolytus, Refutation 5.7.21-22). Copernicus's expression “family of stars” belongs to the teachings of the Aryan cosmogony. A few years ago, Father George Coyne, head of the Vatican Observatory Research Group suggested that we might view stars as God's sperm, which is the basic teaching of the Aryan cosmogony. In the Hindu Myth when the desire arose in it (i.e. in the sun god in the shape of linga (phallus) “the creation” or rather emanation or emission (ejaculation) of semen followed. In the beginning there was sexual desire. John Paul II's Theology of the Body was inspired by this teaching.
Babylonian culture displays a systematic assault on Biblical government. Modern science is only the capstone of a long philosophical maturation that includes evolutionism and heliocentrismof the Babylonian “mighty hunter before the Lor. From Genesis through the Prophets (e.g., Micah 5:6) to Revelation, Nimrod's Babylon is associated with seduction, and the boldest element of political seduction seems to be economic. If Babylon is the great political organizer of men and merchants, it is the Canaanites who are the slaves of the slaves (Gen 9:25); not living for themselves (to say nothing of God) but existing as worker-drones, fulfilling the lusts created by Babylon.
The Universal Religion in the Space Age will be nonsectarian because its founding principle is pantheism:”If we move on to other planets, we may find that planetary religion must give way to solar religion – ONE FAITH for the solar system, and this in turn implies the ultimate need for a cosmic religion. We seem to be approaching universal citizenship, which implies the need for a universal religion.” Well, emperor Septimus Severus proposed to bring all his subjects together under the worship of Sol Invictus – the Unconquered Sun – and to subsume under that worship all the various religions and philosophies then current. All gods were to be accepted, as long as one acknowledged the Sun. Will the people who use the lunar calendar be exterminated?
praja arya jyotiragrah ... (Children of Arya are led by light) Rig Veda, VII. 33.17
We are all souls of fire and children of the sun (John Tyndall, an early darwinist)
The Aryan mode of worship was centred on the fire altar of the sun god, while the Dravidians had water as the base. The Rigveda describes the battle between the forces of light and the forces of darkness. The Vedas proclaim the victory of the light and the destruction of the forces of darkness. The Rigvedic peoples originally had only two social classes: nobles and commoners. Eventually, they added a third: Dasas , or "darks." Dasyus, Dasas, and Panis as people are opposite to Aryans. They are “unspiritual people”. They do not sacrifice, do not offer gifts, do not honor the Gods. In other contexts they are not even people but demons…Dasyu means destroyer and often simply means a robber, a criminal or an uncivilized person or a low class person.In India, under the British Empire, the foundation of Hinduism was ascribed to northern invaders who had established themselves as the dominant castes, and who were supposed to have created the sophisticated Vedic texts. (Entry Caste Wiki) Adressing a man as Arya is equivalent to calling him ‘Sir’ in English.“The brahmin gods are all symbols to destroy the oppressed. The brahmans say ‘aham brahmasmi’ which means everything belongs to me, including Palestine. The Bhagvad Gita and Upanishads are books which will put Mein Kampf to shame. Bhagvad Gita asks the upper caste pandavas to kill their cousins the lower caste kauravas” (Kancha Ilaiah‘Why I am not a Hindu.’2009) According to this postulate, in India, sick and starving people 'of low caste' are left to die in the streets. In Origin of Species (p. 335) Darwin wrote about “the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind.” Some Indian nationalists supported the British version of the theory because it gave them the prestige of common descent with the ruling British class. (Wiki)The British used solar Aryanism to colonize India exactly like the Romans used their solar religion to colonize Africa and Israel turning it into a colony of solar Syria (Syria-Palestina)
“The World Took Its Culture from an elite class” –
A. Hitler, Reden, Schriften, Anordnungen. Februar 1925 bis Januar 1933, vol. 2(2), Munich, 1992. Doc. 245.
The British rulers also used the idea of a distinct Aryan race in order to ally British power with the Indian caste system. Darwin’s natural selection was a child of British imperial policy. Let me explain. According to Blavatsky, the Hindus, mild, patient, long-suffering, whose very apathy saved the British from being driven out of the country in 1857, would raise their hundred millions of devotees as one man, in reaction to a religious desecration; regardless of sects or castes, they would exterminate every Christian. The East India Company knew this well and built her stronghold on the friendship of the Brahmans, and by paying subsidy to the pagodas the British Government was as prudent as its predecessors. It was the castes, and non-inference with the prevailing religions, that secured its comparative authority in India. And the idea of castes was founded on the premise of karsati i.e. natural selection. Darwin was saving the “pearl in the crown” of the British Empress. Brahminism became the religion of the British upper classes (Cp. the Boston Brahmins) with its merciless extermination principle of the weaker peoples. The Hindu Brahmins became Darwin's “Favoured Race” “preserved by their ascendancy and their privileges through all conquests, dynasties and governments for 2,500 years” (Will Durant, Our Oriental Heritage.1954, p.487)
Caste cannot preserve a nonexistent "racial purity”
Some have dug a biological trench in defence of the Caste System. It is said that the object of Caste was to preserve purity of race and purity of blood. Now ethnologists are of the opinion that men of pure race exist nowhere and that there has been a mixture of all races in all parts of the world. Especially is this the case with the people of India. Mr. D. R. Bhandarkar in his paper on "Foreign Elements in the Hindu Population" has stated that "There is hardly a class or Caste in India which has not a foreign strain in it. There is an admixture of alien blood not only among the warrior classes—the Rajputs and the Marathas—but also among the Brahmins who are under the happy delusion that they are free from all foreign elements." The Caste system cannot be said to have grown as a means of preventing the admixture of races, or as a means of maintaining purity of blood. (Dr. Ambedkar, The Annihililation of Caste) Well, Darwin married his first cousin to preserve his “blue blood” intact and paid a terrible price for it.
Manly P. Hall, 33° Freemason wrote "The adoration of the sun was one of the earliest and most natural forms of religious expression. Complex modern theologies are merely involvement's and amplifications of this simple ... belief. The primitive mind, recognizing the beneficent power of the solar orb, adored it as the proxy of the Supreme Deity ... Among all the nations of antiquity, altars, mounds, and temples were dedicated to the worship of the orb of day ... The Tower of Babel ... was probably an astronomical observatory ... The sun, as supreme among the celestial bodies to the astronomers of antiquity, was assigned to the highest of the gods and became symbolic of the supreme authority of the Creator Himself ... Yellow is his color and his power is without end ... The sun thus became a Bull in Taurus and was worshipped as such by the Egyptians under the name of Apis, and by the Assyrians as Bel, Baal, or Bul (John Bull! –rp). In Leo, the sun became a Lion-slayer, Hercules, and an Archer in Sagittarius. In Pices the Fishes, he was a fish -- Dagon, or Vishnu, the fish-god of the Philistines and Hindoos." "The Secret Teachings of All Ages". Indeed, heliocentrism and evolutionism are two pillars the Cosmic Religion inaugurated by the rebellious Nimrod and epitomized by its modern Genesis or Big Namg theory.
Thomas Wilson, Curator of Department of Prehistoric Anthropology, U.S. National Museum in his rare book The Swastika wrote: “Many theories have been presented concerning the symbolism of the Swastika, its relation to ancient deities and its representation of certain qualities. In the estimation of certain writers it has been respectively the emblem of Zeus, of Baal, of the sun, of the sun-god, of the sun-chariot of Agni the fire-god, of Indra the rain-god, of the sky, the sky-god, and finally the deity of all deities, the great God, the Maker and Ruler of the Universe…It is believed by some to have been the oldest Aryan symbol. In the estimation of others it represents Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva, Creator, Preserver, Destroyer.”
“I am still inclined to the notion that Swastika may, at the same time, have been looked upon in some cases as a cross – that is, a pre-Christian cross, which now finds acceptance by some authorities as representing the four cardinal points. The importance of the cardinal points in primitive symbolism appears to me to have been very great, and has not as yet been fully realized. This is too large a matter to deal with here. All I can state is, that the wheel in India was connected with the title of a Chakravartin – from Charkra, a wheel – the title meaning a supreme ruler, or a universal monarch (cp. one world system), who ruled the four quarters of the world, and on his coronation he had to drive his chariot, or wheel, to the four cardinal points to signify his conquest of them…From instances such as these, I am inclined to assume that the Swastika, as a cross, represented the four quarters over which the solar power by its revolving motion carried its influence.” (pp. 770, 791)
The ancient Vedic seers described the original cosmic creative process as “the churning of the milky ocean” whereby fields of subtle substance become condensed into gross matter; a view that is now widely accepted today in energy-field physics research. The Brownian movement is also a miniature replica of “the churning of the milky ocean.” This “churning” is represented geometrically in Tantric ritual as a four armed cross within a circle and the cross is meant to be imagined as oscillating backwards and forwards as in a churning motion. The forward movement marked by right-angled break of the arms of the cross is towards evolution while the left-angled break marks movement towards dissolution. The circle represents the universe in its potential un-manifested state prior to creation and is called in Hinduism “Brahmanda”. The churning also brought the Lakshmi forth from the ocean. It should be reminded in this context that the Greek goddess Venus was believed to be born out of the sea foam.
Darwinists' “Lakhshmi” called Bathybius Haeckelii
In the 1860s, upon the release of Darwin's book, there was much speculation centred on the 'primordial slime' from which life 'first arose' inspired by Darwin's “Little, warm pond”. Ernst Haeckel, a very influential German zoology professor, had even invented a whole family of creatures to fill the gap between non-living slime and one-celled organisms. Drawings and descriptions of these so-called 'Monera', ill-defined blobs of 'protoplasm' without a nucleus, seemed convincing. After no such creatures were found on land, the sea bottom was considered as their possible hiding place. Accordingly, British ships began sampling sea floor sediment. In 1868, one such set of samples contained slimy blobs that generated much excitement among evolutionists. Huxley declared that these were samples of the 'real thing', and even gave them a taxonomic name—Bathybius Haeckeli.However, a few years later, Bathybius was quietly withdrawn from the spotlight. The reason? It turned out that Bathybius ppeared whenever large quantity of spirits of wine was [oured into a bottle containing some pure seawater. It was the chemical precipitate of the sulphate of lime produced by the mixture of alcohol and seawater. A ridiculous error and a ridiculous credulity were the direct results of theoretical preconceptions. Bathybius was accepted because it was in harmony with Darwin's soaring speculations.
Killing your enemy, is central to Brahminism be it the Gita or the Puranas
“Many scholars such as Kant and Herder, began to draw analogies between the myths and philosophies of ancient India and the West. In their attempt to separate Western culture from its Judaic heritage, many scholars were convinced that the origin of Western culture was to be found in India rather than in the ancient Near East.” In the opinion of the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world.
Racism and genocide: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.... The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.” Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 1871, chapter 6. Before 1859 (before Darwin's Origin), many scientists had questioned whether blacks were of the same species as whites, but they had no scientific basis for that notion. Things changed once Darwin presented his racist evolutionary schema. Darwin stated that African-Americans could not survive competition with their white near-relations, let alone being able to compete with the white race. According to Darwin, the African was inferior because he represented the missing-link" between ape and Teuton.
In his book Greater Britain, Dilke had written:
“In America we have seen the struggle of the dear races against the cheap--the endeavors of the English to hold their own against the Irish and Chinese. In New Zealand, we found the stronger and more energetic race pushing from the earth the shrewd and laborious descendants of the Asian Malays; in Australia, the English triumphant, and the cheaper races excluded from the soil not by distance merely, but by arbitrary legislation; in India, we saw the solution of the problem by the officering of the cheaper by the dearer race. Everywhere, we have found that the difficulties which impede the progress to universal dominion of the English people lie in the conflict with the cheaper races. The result of our survey is such as to give us reason for the belief that race distinctions will long continue, that miscegenation will go but a little way towards blending races, that the dearer are on the whole likely to destroy the cheaper peoples and that Saxondom will rise triumphant from the doubtful struggle.'' Darwinism proclaimed the triumph of the favoureud races over the cheaper people.
“Jews Are the Cheaper, Mongrel People”
The following is an excerpt from a Palestinian history textbook: “The Philistines, who came from Crete and Asia Minor, merged with the Canaanites, who originated from the Arabian peninsula, and gave the land is name, Falastin. The Jebusites, a Canaanite people, are the ancestors of the Palestinians. Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but a “believer in one God.” The twelve sons of Jacob fled to Egypt, interbred with the Egyptians there and became numerous. Moses and his followers wandered in the desert; they were not endowed with any scientific or artistic talents and made no cultural achievements whatsoever…” That explains why the Egyptian journalist Musa Sabri called Arafat a “corrupt war criminal” “clown of every circus” and a treacherous bloodsucker.
It is shocking that the so-called New Israel Fund(NIF) which receives much of its money from the Ford Foundation disburses millions of dollars annually to 16 Israeli NGOs that collaborated with the UN Human Rights Council and Richard Goldstone to bring about the establishment of the Goldstone committee and give credibility to its allegations that Israel committed war crimes during Operation Cast Lead. These renegades are seduced by Aryan Secular Science and hate the God of the Bible. Henry Ford in the 1920s published ill-famous The International Jew which inspired the recent The Israel Lobby.
To Goebbels, Hitler, Himmler and others, including certain Theologians of the time, the Old Testament was also seen as inferior as the Jews were seen as an inferior and 'past' race. Himmler's favorite book was, of course, the Bhagavat Gita...
Knesset Members Study Torah
Shevat 25, 5770, 09 February 10 11:13. by Arutz Sheva
In a special Tuesday session of the House of Torah Study for Knesset Members, headed by Education and Culture Committee Chairman Zevulun Orlev, leaders from the Jewish Federation of New York took part in Torah study with Knesset members. They studies the importance of contributing to society.
The Palestinian authors were inspired by these passages from A. Hitler’s “Mein Kampf”: “…What we see before us of human culture today, the results of art, science, and techniques, is almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan.” (…) “The Jew forms the strongest contrast to the Aryan.’’(…) “The Jewish person, with all its apparent intellectual qualities, is nevertheless without any true culture, especially without a culture of its own. For the sham culture which the Jew possesses today is the property of other peoples, and is mostly spoiled in his hands. When judging Jewry in its attitude towards the question of human culture, one has to keep before one’s eyes as an essential characteristic that there never has been and consequently that today also there is no Jewish art; that above all the two queens of all arts, architecture and music, owe nothing original to Jewry. What he achieves in the field of art is either bowdlerization or intellectual theft. With this, the Jew lacks those qualities which distinguish creatively and, with it, culturally blessed races.’’
Using the Big Gun of Evolution against Jewish People
The first lobbying effort on behalf of a Jewish state in Palestine was not organized or initiated by Jews. It occurred in 1891, when a popular fundamentalist Christian writer and lay-preacher, William E. Blackstone, organized a national campaign to appeal to the then-president of the United States, Benjamin Harrison, to support the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. Blackstone gained notoriety through his 1882 national bestseller Jesus is Coming, his summary of end-of-time premillennial doctrines. He saw a need to politically support the Jewish people after hearing horrifying stories of the pogroms in Russia. Blackstone appealed to multimillionaire friends such as oil magnate John D. Rockefeller, publisher Charles B. Scribner and industrialist JP Morgan to finance advertisements and a petition campaign that were carried in major newspapers from Boston to the Mississippi. Aside from wealthy financiers, Blackstone also received support from most members of the US Senate and House of Representatives and the chief justice of the Supreme Court. Despite powerful backing, his appeal went nowhere. If Brahminism was the Religion, Judaism had to be degraded as a superstition concocted by a backward people whose minds were truly “childish”.
There is little record of significant political backing for the Zionist cause after Blackstone's initiative, as fundamentalists began to withdraw from political activity following the Scopes trial and battles over evolution.
An American version of Dr. Ambedkar's The Annihilation of Caste is Eugene Givenchy's the End of Darwinismwhich exposes all the hoaxes and political maneuvering to secure the final triumph of Darwin's hypothesis. Thomas Huxley known also as Darwin's bloody-fanged bulldog one of the 9-member “politbiuro” which worked hard to preserve Darwin's legacy observed: "You have no notion of the intrigue that goes on in this blessed world of science. Science is, I fear, no purer than any other region of human activity; though it should be."
Indeed, In the most revealing chapter about The Scopes Monkey Trial and Hollywood's Bible-mocking movie "Inherit the Wind," the author exposed the intrigue about the Trial of the Century concocted by the “Gang of Four”: Scopes never taught evolution and never took the stand. His students were tutored to commit perjury. And William Jennings Bryan held his own against the atheist Darrow in the transcript of the trial. Nobody knows anymore what Darwinism is really all about. God won't be mocked.
According to The New Age Dictionary. A Guide to Planetary Family Consciousness. Ed. By Alex Jack. (Japan Publications, Inc. 1990), Charles Darwin was “evolutionist who played a bassoon for his plants.” Like a Hindu Jugglers described by Blavatsky.

Continuing Scientific Legacy of the Nazi Germany

Aryan Science and the Jewish Holocaust
Big Bang theory referred to as Modern “Genesis” retired the Biblical Genesis because the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske imparted to the enthusiastic audiences his conviction that the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world. Oliver Stone in his laterst documentary series "Secret History of America" is rehabilitating Hitler and Stalin as typical scape goats of public opinion. In fact, the director argues they were both products of their historical period. Let me add here that Philosopher M. Polanyi observed, “Newtonian physics and Darwin’s notion of the survival of the fittest were key elements both in the Marxist concepts of class warfare and of racial philosophies which shaped Hitlerism and scientific world view.” Logically, we may expect that another Jewish Holocaust is unavoidable and it will be a product of John Paul II's rehabilitation of Criminal “Science.”
U.S. Envoy to Ukraine Slams Jews for Holocaust and Communism
The Chicago Tribune reported, ‘And official U.S. delegation sent to Ukraine’s recent presidential inauguration of Yushchenko included a Ukrainian-American who has accused Jews of manipulating the Holocaust for their gain and playing an “inordinate role” in the rise of Soviet communism.”
Myron Kuropas was selected by the White House to fly to Ukraine with then-Secretary of State Colin Powell as part of the American delegation. Mr. Kuropas wrote in 2000, “Big money drives the Holocaust industry. To survive, the Holocaust industry is always searching for its next mark. Ukraine’s turn is just around the corner.” He has argued elsewhere that Jews played a driving role behind Soviet leader Joseph Stalin’s murderous policies in Ukraine. Mr. Kuropas has demonstrated his hostility towards Jews for some time. Michael Kotzin, executive vice president of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, explained to the Chicago Tribune, “This is not new stuff…if you go back over the decades, he’s taken these kinds of positions highly antagonistic to the Jewish people and Jewish interests and causes.”
The Knight Ridder news service confirmed “three State Department officials said the delegation was assembled by the White House.”
“It is astounding that on the eve of commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps, President Bush’s staff would not even bother to look into Kuropas’ regular attacks on Jews and what he terms the ‘Holocaust industry before sending him to Ukraine with our Secretary of State, to represent the United States of America,’ said National Jewish Democratic Council Executive Director Ira N. Forman. This deeply embarrassing incident shows a lack of judgment on the part of the White House and, frankly, a lack of basic competence,” Forman added.
Israel Supports Russia’s Efforts to Preserve Truth about World War Two
URL: http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/111616-israel_russia-0, 12.01.2010
Israeli newspaper Maariv reported that Israeli President Shimon Peres played a significant role in recent Russian-American agreement regarding Europe-based missile defense shield system. In his phone conversations with Obama and during their personal meetings he insisted that abandoning the idea of basing missile defense in Europe was necessary. Why did he have to make efforts that would result in strengthening of Russia’s positions?
Avigdor Eskin, Israeli political analyst, shared his comments on the matter:
“The decision of OSCE that equates Soviet soldiers with Nazi monsters, revengeful attitudes and encouragement of a new wave of Nazism at the state level in Ukraine and Baltic countries, along with the USA’s intentions to locate missile defense near the Russian borders, is a new and dangerous round of attempts to destabilize the situation in the region. It is also an attempt to try new methods in shaping borders and spheres of influence.
The specific role that Israel took up in its eagerness to persuade Obama’s administration not to aggravate a conflict reflects the state strategy of Israel. In recent years, Peres revisited his old role of a recognized master of diplomacy. It is not surprising that he started the project of preventing basing a missile defense shield system in Poland and the Czech Republic and went through with it.
The question of the reasoning behind Israel’s attempt to stop the spread of the American influence in the former CIS countries is very appropriate. The processes associated with the attempts to create a blockade situation for Russia and build a new order in the region do not coincide with Israel’s interests.
In order to understand the essential differences between the interests of Israel and the USA in the post-Soviet region, let us imagine a possible continuation of Bush’s policy. Active revival of Nazism in Ukraine and the Baltic countries at some point started to gain momentum. Americans came to a conclusion that there was nothing good they could expect from these nations and that the only choice the said nations had was between the color of red (getting close with Russia), and the color of brown.
Washington considers the second option to be the lesser evil. A US ambassador in Kiev personally awarded graduates of the Security Service of Ukraine with stripes knowing very well that he was encouraging the supporters of the Nazi ideology. The Academy was recently named after Shukhevych, the leader of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. The US Department of State and CIA not only condone the spirit of revengefulness in Ukraine and in the Baltic countries, but consciously encourage it guided by the intentions not to allow Russia to return to these lands.
A possibility of further unification and consolidation of Ukraine and the Baltic countries on the basis of rehabilitation and revival of Nazism is encouraged externally by similar tendencies in Romania that can spread to Moldavia up to an attempt of aggression against Transdniestria.
Yet, as it often happens with the Americans, their fosterlings have a tendency to get out of control. It cannot be ruled out that these post-Soviet tendencies will become the third power in Europe between the liberal West and Russia.
Israel is concerned with the American project in Eastern Europe because the Russophobia implanted there is immediately interwoven with Judaeophobia. Regardless of instantaneous rewards that can be tempting for the Israeli government, the spread of Nazism across the post-Soviet territory will always remain a direct threat not only for Jewish communities, but for Israel itself.
As for Russia, today it serves as a stabilizer not only in the Western regions of the former USSR, but also in the Caucuses and Central Asia.If we look at separatist tendencies within Russia from Jerusalem, we will come to a conclusion that any scenario of Russia’s separation or collapse would cause strengthening of the anti-Israeli forces.
All these tendencies are dangerous for Israel. The enhancement of a popular attitude suggesting that every national group that declares itself a nation should create an independent country is also dangerous. “Right for a state” is a direct result of the liberal view of the world currently selectively used by the West, promoting double standards. In the context of the Israeli-Russian relations, the struggle against the attempts to falsify the history of World War II is particularly important.
Mocking and hypocritical decision of OSCE that equated Soviet soldiers with killer monsters removed the scales from eyes of many Russians, revealing the real face of Western politicians who followed their Baltic colleagues. The basis for claims against Russia by Baltic revenge seekers and other supporters of Nazis is being prepared. Israel is concerned with these tendencies . Dr. Yehuda Bauer, a leading Israeli historian and scholar of the Holocaust, fiercely rebuffed historians revising the history.
At a special meeting in Yad Vashem, Israeli memorial for Holocaust remembrance, devoted to the 70th anniversary of Molotov - Ribbentrop Pact, he paid special attention to the attempts of the history falsification. He said that World War II had its liberators, Russian soldiers. He stated that while someone may not appreciate the Soviet regime, it had nothing to do with the fact that the Germans were the occupants and monsters, while Russian soldiers were the heroes and liberators.
In other words, the attempts to re-write World War II history are directed both against Israel and Russia, hence mutual interests. It is now up to those who govern in Jerusalem and Moscow. Peres’s success in preventing American missile defense shield system based in Eastern Europe is a great example for cooperation. Will Russian leaders be wise enough to act in compliance with the real geopolitical vectors? Will they be able to promote real interests of our peoples or will they continue encouraging the liberalization processes, entropy and territorial concessions?”
Avigdor Eskin , Pravda.Ru
LifeSiteNews.com Tuesday September 12, 2006
Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: “Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution”
Regensburg, Germany, September 12, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com This morning Pope Benedict XVI discussed evolution in his homily at the outdoor Mass celebrated in Islinger Field. In a direct attack on the concept of random chance evolution, Pope Benedict asked rhetorically: “What came first? Creative Reason, the Spirit who makes all things and giveth them growth, or Unreason, which, lacking any meaning, yet somehow brings forth a mathematically ordered cosmos, as well man and his reson.”
The Pope explained that the belief in God as Creator comes in the most ancient profession of faith known to Christians, The Apostle's Creed. “As Christians, we say: I believe in God the Father, the Creator of heaven and earth – I believe in the creator Spirit. We believe that at the beginning of everything is the eternal Word, with Reason and not Unreason,” he said.
Polish scientists fight creationism:
"No Reasonable Scientist Denies the Theory of Evolution"
autor: PAP, ar, 2006-10-19, Ostatnia aktualizacja
The Senate of the Warsaw Universirty declared just two weeks after the Pope's statement in Regensburg. The theory of evolution is commonly accepted by the scientists and it makes no sense to put it vis-a-vis creationism because creationism is no Science, said the spokesman of the Warsaw University. This statement was a reaction to the enunciations of politicians who maintained that evolution should not be taught in schools. In other words, unlike John Paul II, this Pope is no Reasonable Scientist. The opposition of Polish authorities to the German Pope materialized in the decision to build a Centre of Science Kopernik in Warsaw.
Nature 443, 890-891 (26 October 2006)
Almut Graebsch
Abstract
Deputy education minister calls evolution a 'lie'.
Fifty leading scientists in Poland have signed an open letter in protest against an aggressive anti-evolution campaign launched by the League of Polish Families (LPR), the ultra-right-wing coalition partner in the conservative Polish government."The theory of evolution is a lie," Mirosaw Orzechowski, Poland's deputy education minister, told the newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza on 14 October.
Atheists of All Countries Unite
In November 2006 a new Center for Inquiry held its inaugural press conference in Washington, D.C. Its aim? To “promote and defend reason, science, and freedom of inquiry in all areas of human endeavor.” This was deemed necessary because of the resurgence of fundamentalist religions across the nation, and their alliance with political-ideological movements to block science.” Prominent scientists signed a declaration lamenting the “persistence of paranormal and occult beliefs” and “retreat into mysticism.” Their contention was that public policies should be shaped by secular values (i.e. by atheistic values) and that science and secularism are “inextricably linked.” If they are, and if Richard Dawkins (b. 1941) is right to regard the existence of God as a vulnerable “scientific hypothesis”, it seems reasonable to assert that scientific progress has been the prinicapl cause of secularization.
Evangelist D. James Kennedy’s Florida-based television and radio organization, Coral Ridge Ministries, has produced a TV documentary and a book linking the Holocaust to the theory of evolution. Called Darwin’s Deadly Legacy, the documentary aired Aug. 26-27 on Christian cable networks and about 200 television stations across the country. It is now being sold on DVD along with the companion book, Evolution’s Fatal Fruit: How Darwin’s Tree of Life Brought Death to Millions. Both describe the Nazis’ embrace of eugenics and social Darwinism, their attempt to build a master race and to justify racism, slavery and even murder as survival of the fittest.
In 2006, the National Religious Broadcasters association inducted Kennedy into its Hall of Fame. As a result of a heart attack from which he never fully recovered, Kennedy last preached at Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church later that year, on December 24, 2006. His retirement was officially announced at the church on August 26, 2007.
Atheist clubs are springing up in American high schools,
warns head of US Catholic bishops
by Damian Thompson, Telegraph
Reposted from: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100012851/atheist-clubs-are-springing-up-in-american-high-schools-warns-head-of-us-catholic-bishops/ A “triumphalistic, self-righteous atheism” inspired by the work of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris is winning a following among American young people, leading to “atheist clubs” in high schools, according to Cardinal Francis George of Chicago. The cardinal, who is President of the US Catholic Bishops’ Conference, says that unbelief among young people is more than a question of stopping going to church: it is part of a fashionable “new atheism” which is every bit as intolerant as Christian fundamentalism. He told John Allen of the National Catholic Reporter: “In Chicago, we now have atheist clubs in high schools. We didn’t have those five years ago. Kids I would have confirmed in the eighth grade, by the time they’re sophomores in high school say they’re atheists. They don’t just stop going to church, they make a statement. I think that’s new. That’s perhaps a bit more like Europe.”
YouTube is crawling with videos by articulate, friendly American teenagers and university students proclaiming their uncompromising atheism; indeed, atheism is one of the fastest-growing movements in the 18-25 age group, casting doubt on old assumptions that the religious impulse is somehow hard-wired into the American psyche. (Wednesday, October 7, 2009 )
Making a Monkey Out of Darwin
Pat Buchanan
"You have no notion of the intrigue that goes on in this blessed world of science," wrote Thomas Huxley. "Science is, I fear, no purer than any other region of human activity; though it should be."
As "Darwin's bulldog," Huxley would himself engage in intrigue, deceit and intellectual property theft to make his master's theory gospel truth in Great Britain.
He is quoted above for two reasons.
First is House passage of a "cap-and-trade" climate-change bill. Depending on which scientists you believe, the dire consequences of global warming are inconvenient truths — or a fearmongering scheme to siphon off the wealth of individuals and empower bureaucrats.
The second is publication of "The End of Darwinism: And How a Flawed and Disastrous Theory Was Stolen and Sold," by Eugene G. Windchy, a splendid little book that begins with Huxley's lament.
That Darwinism has proven "disastrous theory" is indisputable.
"Karl Marx loved Darwinism," writes Windchy. "To him, survival of the fittest as the source of progress justified violence in bringing about social and political change, in other words, the revolution."
"Darwin suits my purpose," Marx wrote. Darwin suited Adolf Hitler's purposes, too.
"Although born to a Catholic family Hitler become a hard-eyed Darwinist who saw life as a constant struggle between the strong and the weak. His Darwinism was so extreme that he thought it would have been better for the world if the Muslims had won the eighth century battle of Tours, which stopped the Arabs' advance into France. Had the Christians lost, (Hitler) reasoned, Germanic people would have acquired a more warlike creed and, because of their natural superiority, would have become the leaders of an Islamic empire."
Charles Darwin also suited the purpose of the eugenicists and Herbert Spencer, who preached a survival-of-the-fittest social Darwinism to robber baron industrialists exploiting 19th-century immigrants.
For 150 years, the fossil record has failed to validate Darwin. ((On 22 October 1996John paul said"...les nouvelles connaissances conduisent a reconnaitre dans la theorie de l'evolution plus qu'une hypothese", which means that the Pope lied -rp)
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontologists," admitted Stephen J. Gould in 1977. But that fossil record now contains even more species that appear fully developed, with no traceable ancestors.
Darwin ruled out such "miracles."
And Darwinists still have not explained the origin of life, nor have they been able to produce life from non-life.
The most delicious chapter is Windchy's exposure of the Scopes Monkey Trial and Hollywood's Bible-mocking movie "Inherit the Wind," starring Spencer Tracy as Clarence Darrow.
The trial was a hoked-up scam to garner publicity for Dayton, Tenn. Scopes never taught evolution and never took the stand. His students were tutored to commit perjury. And William Jennings Bryan held his own against the atheist Darrow in the transcript of the trial.
In 1981, Gould had this advice for beleaguered Darwinists: "Perhaps we should all lie low and rally round the flag of strict Darwinism ... a kind of old-time religion on our part." Exactly. Darwinism is not science. It is faith. Always was.
Patrick Buchanan, former White House Chief of Staff during Reagan presidency, a catholic is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
The End of Darwinism:The Cover-Up Gets Underway
by Eugene G. Windchy
After a conference of 160 biologists rejected Darwinism in 1980, Harvard University’s famous evolutionary biologist Stephen J. Gould declared the theory “dead” in a scientific journal. In 1981, however, Gould noticed a trend among his colleagues to “mute” debate on theory so as not to encourage the creationists , and he said, “Perhaps we should all lie low and rally around the flag of strict Darwinism—a kind of old time religion on our part.”
As a case in point, in 1999 I was amused to see how Gould rode to the rescue of Darwinism in Kansas, where the state school board voted to let the local school boards decide what to teach about evolution. Apparently outraged by this attack on the Darwinists’ united front, Gould wrote for Time magazine an essay titled, “Dorothy, It’s Really Oz.” In it the Harvard professor skillfully ridiculed the Kansas plan and he eloquently defended evolution as fact—without ever mentioning Darwin or his theory…In effect, Gould defended textbook Darwinism, which he had declared “dead,” while not saying a word about it.
Sitting in Cambridge, Massachusetts, did Gould know what exactly he was defending in Kansas (maybe that [fraudulent] giraffe?). I could not find out. Wanting to obtain a list of the state’s biology books, I telephoned long distance to the Kansas School Board, and a very uncooperative employee told me I would have to ask the individual schools—as if the board did not know what books it had authorized. The telephone company helped me to reach a high school, where a panicky biology teacher demanded, “Why are you singling me out?” Nothing would persuade the man to let me know what biology books were being used in his school.How did public education get to be secret education? Sir Walter Scott understood that sort of thing. In his familiar words, “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive.”
Eugene G. Windchy in 1967 left his position as the U.S. Information Agency’s Assistant Science Adviser to investigate the forgotten naval incidents that enabled United States participation in the Vietnam War. This led to his writing Tonkin Gulf, which was reviewed in the New York Times as "superb investigative reporting" (September 26, 1971).
Windchy wrote the New Republic’s analysis of the Pentagon Papers (August 7, 1971) and other articles for the Nation, Saturday Review, Atlantic, and the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. In another New Republic article (January 29, 1972) Windchy contested the settled academic opinion, among both historians and political scientists, that the president has constitutional authority to make war without the nation’s having been attacked. Windchy drew upon James Madison’s notes concerning the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to show that, in the absence of attack, only the Congress has the right to initiate war. He also debunked a State Department document that purported to show that on 125 occasions presidents had exercised the war power on their own initiative. These were insignificant incidents, and on one occasion the U.S. Navy actually fired on a U.S. Consulate.
Pope Benedict XVI Enlists the Help of Russian Scientists
Scientific Conference Refuting Evolution Theory to be held in Rome, Italy
The Scientific Impossibility of Evolution
November 9, 2009 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. St. Pius V University (Rome)
In Response to Pope Benedict XVI’s Call for Both Sides to be Heard
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - OCTOBER 16, 2009
The Scientific Revolution started dominating accounts of the past only after the Second Warld War, when historians optimistically (and unrealistically) predicted that science would provide a universal, secular faith to unite the world. Thomas Kuhn's name symbolizes current views that science lurches unpredictable, a fallible human endeavor swayed like any other by local influences, personal interests, and political pressures.
The 150th anniversary of Darwin’s "Origin of the Species" in November 2009 was the occasion for a unique conference at Pope Pius V University in Rome presenting a scientific refutation of evolution theory. According to Russian sedimentologist Alexander Lalamov, “Everything contained in Darwin’s Origin of Species depends upon rocks forming slowly over enormous periods of time. The November conference demonstrates with empirical data that such geological time is not available for evolution.” Recently returned from a ground-breaking geological conference in Kazan, sedimentologist Guy Berthault will present the findings of several sedimentological studies conducted and published in Russia. In one of these, the age of the rock formation surveyed was found to be 0.01% of the age attributed to it by the geological time-scale—instead of an age of 10 million years, the actual age was no more than one thousand years. “Contrary to the conventional wisdom,” Lalamov observed, “these rocks formed quickly, and the fossils they contain must be relatively young. This finding contradicts the evolutionary interpretation of the fossil record.” www.sedimentology.fr
According to US biophysicist Dr. Dean Kenyon, “Biological macroevolution collapses without the twin pillars of the geological time-scale and the fossil record as currently interpreted. Few scientists would contest this statement. This is why the upcoming conference concentrates on geology and paleontology. Recent research in these two disciplines adds powerful support to the already formidable case against teaching Darwinian macroevolution as if it were proven fact.”
Polish Scientists Strike Back
www.tehrantimes.com, Monday Jan. 11, 2010
4-legged animals emerged earlier than thought
LONDON (AP) -- The water-dwelling ancestors of modern-day mammals, reptiles and birds emerged onto land millions of years earlier than previously believed, researchers reported. A set of fossilized footprints show that the first tetrapods — a term applied to any four-footed animal with a spine — were treading open ground 397 million years ago, well before scientists thought they existed. An expert unconnected with the research said the find would force experts to reconsider a critical period in evolution when sea-based vertebrates took their first steps toward becoming dinosaurs, mammals and — eventually — human beings. “It blows the whole story out of the water, so to speak,” said Jenny Clack, a paleontologist at Cambridge University. Until now, scientists thought they had the evolution from fin to foot fairly well understood. The earliest tetrapods had been traced to 385 million years ago. Experts theorized that they had split from their close relatives, a fleshy-finned family of fish, a few million years earlier and then gone on to conquer land. But the new fossil footprints — uncovered between 2002 and 2007 in a disused quarry in central Poland — push the timing back by several million years, according to Grzegorz Pienkowski, the scientific director of the Polish Geological Institute in Warsaw, where most of the article's authors are based. He said the fossils had been securely dated from the deposits they were found with. Although at least some of the footprints may have been made in shallow water, paleontologist Per Ahlberg, one of the article's co-authors, said it was nevertheless clear from the shape of the toe prints and the nature of the sediment that the animals spent time walking around on land. “We know from the site that you have rain drop prints and mud cracks in the sediment,” he said, noting also that the prints appeared far too crisp to have been made underwater. The find also challenges the commonly accepted notion that tetrapods colonized the surface from lakes or river beds. Ahlberg and his colleagues argued that the footprints were first created in what was probably a lagoon-like environment at the time, adding that a coastal location made sense because shifting tides could strand small marine animals, giving our fishy forebears an incentive to explore open land.
Although she acknowledged their importance, Clack warned against drawing conclusions exclusively on small marks left by animals on the bottom of a muddy surface hundreds of millions of years ago. She said it would be critical to see fossil evidence of the creature that made the footprints before coming to any definitive conclusion on exactly how, when and where vertebrates came to colonize the earth's surface. She said some theorized that tetrapods originally went ashore to lay their eggs out of reach of water-going predators or that their ancestors grew legs to scurry from pool to pool. She said she had personally favored the notion that fish emerged from oxygen-deprived waters in order, quite literally, to catch their breath. All those theories were called into question by the Polish find, she said. It wouldn't be logical for fish to lay their eggs in a place where the tide would wash right over them, for example, and the pool-hopping behavior wouldn't make sense in a coastal environment. As for her oxygen hypothesis, Clack said “that's probably out the window.” The fossils suggested that tetrapods evolved well before marine oxygen levels started to drop, she said. Ahlberg said paleontologists were already scouring the area for more evidence of footprints — and fossils of the animals themselves. “Obviously the hunt is on,” he said.
In 2000 the British magazine New Scientist devoted a cover story urging readers to “Start Worrying Now” because “From Kansas to Korea, Creationism is Flooding the earth.” Although this development seemed almost “beyond belief”, the magazine described creationism as “mutating and spreading” around the world even linking up with the like-minded people in the Muslim world.” Just five years later representatives from national academies of science around the world joined in signing a statement supporting evolution and condemning the global spread of “theories not testable by science.” Contrary to all expectations, geographical theologial, and political barriers had utterly failed to contain what had begun as a distinctively American movement to create a Bible-based alternative to evolution. Did the Superpower, like the Soviet Union contain it? Where is the Soviet Union? God won't be mocked! Can Poland win the battle, the Soviet Union lost?
Zaginęło dwóch geologów. Wielkie poszukiwania
bdc 2010-01-10, ostatnia aktualizacja 2010-01-10 16:00:02.0
On January 10, 2010 the Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza reported that a black Nissan patrol with two Polish geologists Patelski Piotr – 26-year-old and his 23-year-old colleague disappeared from the face of the earth. On January 13, the choppers of border guard found the car in the river Narew. They continue looking for their bodies, or for their footprints, which, according to their belief, will stay as the proof of their existence for millions of years.
January 12, 2010. Italian Vaticanist Andrea Tornielli has published unedited material in his latest book on John Paul II, titled “Santo Subito” or “Immediate Saint”. In the book, he discloses never before heard testimonies, from those who knew John Paul II best. Tornielli hopes to shed some light on what made John Paul II a powerful figure.Andrea TornielliAuthor “Santo Subito”"He spoke with God. You would take one look at him and you knew that he was a person who talked frequently with God.” The book includes unedited episodes throughout his pontificate. For example, the times he would break protocol to visit with ill patients. On one occasion he received a patient in his private chapel who wanted to see him, even though the patient had not made a formal request.
The Pope has blood on his hands
The Pope did great damage to the church, and to countless Catholics
Terry Eagleton - Monday April 4, 2005 The Guardian
Terry Eagleton, professor of cultural theory at Manchester University in his Special report for Guardian Unlimited wrote: “John Paul acknowledged equality with nobody. From his early years as a priest, he was notable for his exorbitant belief in his own spiritual and intellectual powers. Graham Greene once dreamed of a newspaper headline reading “John Paul canonises Jesus Christ” Bishops were summoned to Rome to be given their orders, not for fraternal consultation. Loopy far-right mystics and Francoists were honoured, and Latin American political liberationists bawled out. The Pope's authority was so unassailable that the head of a Spanish seminary managed to convince his students that he had the Pope's personal permission to masturbate them. Marco Politi, Vatican correspondent for “La Repubblica, in his book La Confesione (2001) disclosed a network of gay priests throughout Italy. Well, the pedophile priests in the United States never were sent to a prison; they just paid for their perversions. Roman Polanski did the same, yet the US justice wants to put him into prison. He is Jewish and that explains his predicament.
John Paul II's “Fittest Man”
Reports that Pope John Paul II made an appeal to the British government for the release of Augusto Pinochet “for humanitarian reasons” provoked outrage from human rights groups and relatives of the victims of Pinochet's murderous regime in Chile. Vatican spokesman Joaquin Navarro Valls confirmed that the Pope had interceded on hehalf of the former Chilean dictator.
In Chile an organization representing relatives of the “disappeared” published an open letter to the Pope declaring, “The Catholic Church cannot teach that to kill, to disappear and to torture thousands of oppositionists can be crimes that are left unpunished.”
In Argentina, the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, the most prominent organization of relatives of the tens of thousands of victims of that country's military dictatorship of the 1970s and early 1980s, went further, accusing John Paul II of “defending assassins.”
“We address you as a common citizen, because it appears aberrant to us from the Papal throne in the Vatican, without knowing nor having suffered the electric prods, the mutilations, rapes, you decide, in the name of Jesus Christ, to ask clemency for the murderer,” read the letter that the group gave to the Papal Nuncio in Buenos Aires.
“Jesus was crucified and his flesh was lacerated by the Judases who like you today defended the assassins,” it continued.
In 1991, after the leaders of the militrary junta had been found guilty of political mass murder, torture and other crimes and susequently pardoned by Peronist President Carlos Menem, they joined him as guests of honor at a reception held by the Vatican's representative in Buenos Aires marking the thirteenthg anniversary of Wojtyla's ascension to the Papal throne. Http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/mar1999/pope-m04.shtml
Pinichet's Victims Museum
Chile is gearing up for a presidential run-off next Sunday after neither top candidate clinched a definitive win in the first round of voting.
Independent candidate Sebastian Pinera, a conservative billionaire, is in the lead at present against former president Eduardo Frei.It is the largest show of support an independent candidate has seen in recent history. The two main candidates faced off in a televised debate late on Monday as their campaigns reach the final stretch.
At the centre of that debate was Chile's human-rights record. Some of Pinera's conservative supporters are known to have backed Augusto Pinochet's iron rule decades ago.
Amid this flurry of political activity, a new memorial museum is opening this week in Santiago, the capital, a project led personally by Michelle Bachelet, the current president.
The museum is a tribute to tens of thousands of victims, who like herself, suffered under Pinochet's rule. The Museum, like Yad vaShem, exhibits thousands of photos of the murdered victims.
Al Jazeera's Lucia Newman has this report. esday, January 13, 2010 , 12:54 Mecca time, 09:54 GMT. No other paper in the whole world dared print this piece of news. The UN did not send a Goldstone to investigate these murders.
Roman Pytel, Ph.D. poles4israel
http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/

The Scientific Impossibility of Heliocentrism

If perchance there shall be idle talkers, who, though they are ignorant of all mathematical sciences, nevertheless assume the right to pass judgment on these things, and if they should dare to criticise and attack this hypothesis of mine (English translations of this letter put 'theory' instead of 'hypothesis') because of some passage of Scripture which they have falsely distorted for their own purpose, I care not at all; I will even despise their judgment as foolish. (Copernicus, in his dedicatory Letter to Pope Paul III)
So far as hypotheses are concerned, let no one expect anything certain from astronomy, which cannot furnish it, lest he accept as the truth ideas conceived for another purpose, and depart from this study a greater fool than when he entered it. Nicolaus Copernicus
Archimedes rejected classical heliocentrism of Aristarchus as a hypothesis and immortalized this rejection in his saying: “Give me a place to stand on and I will move the earth.” But Plutarch who was a priest of Apollo in the Delphic Oracle wrote, in the defense of the solar religion he professed, that a certain Seleucus, a Syrian astrologer proved Aristarchus' scheme. The authors of the Syrian translation of the Gospels known as Peshitta smuggled into their translation of the Gospel of Luke Seleucus's heliocentrism, but the canonical evangelists ignored it. Well, the Syrians, like Plutarch and the Romans worshipped a sun god under the name Mar Alah whose sculpture was preserved. The Hebrew Torah forbade the worship of sun, moon and other host of heaven, which was a common practice in all natural religions.
The Burden of Proof
In his Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina Galileo draws the distinction between scientific propositions which are “soundly demonstrated” (i.e. Proved) and others which are “merely stated”. If propositions of the first kind contradict the apparent meaning of passages in the bible, then, according to theological practice, the meaning of the passages must be reinterpreted. So far he has stated the attitude of the Church correctly; but he continues: “And as to the propositions which are stated but not rigorously demonstrated, anything contrary to the bible involved by them must be held false and should be proved so by every possible means.”
Now this was not the attitude of the Church. “Propositions which are stated but not rigorousalyy demonstrated,” such as the Copernican system itself, were not condemned outright if they seemed to contradict Holy Scripture; they were merely relegated to the rank of “working hypotheses”, with an implied “wait and see”; if you bring proof, then, but only then, we shall have to interpret Scripture in the light of necessity.” But Galileo did not want to bear the burden of proof; for the crux of the matter is, that he had no proof. Therefore, firstly, he conjured up an artificial black-and-white perspective, by pretending that a proposition must either be accepted or outright condemned. The purpose of this sleight of hand becomes evident from the next sentence:
“Now it truly demonstrated physical conclusions need not be subordinated to biblical passages, but the latter must rather be shown not to interfere with the former, then before a physical proposition is condemned it must be shown to be not rigorously demonstrated – and this is to be done not by those who hold the proposition to be true, but by those who judge it to be false. This seems very reasonable, for those who believe an argument to be false may much more easily find the fallacies in it than men who consider it to be trues and conclusive...”
The burden of proof has been shifted. The crucial words are those in italics. It is no longer Galileo's task to prove the Copernican system, but the theologians' task to disprove it. If they don't, their case will go by default, and Scripture must be reinterpreted. (A. Koestler, The Sleepwalkers, 436ff)
Well, in my comments for Blog4Brownback I did just that: I disproved the Copernican system showing that both Copernicus and Galileo did not really understand the mathematical working of heliocentricity.
The Lethal Math of the Solstices
Since Plato, all heliocentrists use the same deceiving trick: whenever they cannot explain certain phenomena in terms of heliocentric philosophy they revert to geocentric language or intermingle heliocentrism with geocentrism. The following excerpt from Wkipedia (entry: Solstice) is a typical sample of this doubletalk: “A solstice occurs twice a year, whenever Earth’s axis tilts the most toward or away from the Sun, causing the Sun to be farthest north or south at noon. The name is derived from Latin sol (sun) and sistere (to stand still), because at the solstice, the Sun stands still in declination, that is, its movement north or south is minimal.The sun doesn't move north or south in heliocentrism, it is the earth on its ecliptic which runs its yearly course.
According to the British National Maritime Museum, the solstices are the time when the Sun is at its furthest from the celestial equator and these occur in mid-summer and mid-winter. Incidentally, the British celebrate their midsummer’s day on either the 23rd or 24th of June, although their scientists assert that the longest day actually falls on the 21st of June and Wikipedia stresses that “Solstitial celebrations still centre upon 24 June, which is no longer the longest day of the year”.
In geocentrism, we would say: since the month of June the sun travels ever so slightly southward in the ecliptic each day for some six month of the year and each day the daylight becomes shorter. In December the sun halts for a few days in its journey before commencing the slow ascension northward once more for the next six month.
The sun moves in two cycles: 1) it is spiraling downward toward the tropic of Capricorn where the winter solstice occurs and 2) it is spiraling upwards toward the tropic of Cancer where the summer solstice occurs. Amazing thing is that when it reaches these two tropics it stays, for a few days, on the same orbit, or in other words, the sun stands still in declination.
The Inca Festival of the sun (Inti Raymi) marked the winter solstice and a new year in the Andes. One ceremony performed by the Inca priests was the tying of the sun. The ceremony to tie the sun to the stone was to prevent the sun from escaping to the North Pole. In Machu Picchu there is still a large column of stone called an Intihuatana, meaning “hitching post of the sun” or literally for tying the sun. The Roman Church, in order to prevent all critical reflection on Copernicus’s book, ordered the Spanish conquistadors to suppress all Inti Festivals, and to destroy all the intihuatana. One was preserved because the Spanish conquest never found Machu Picchu.. The perennial Roman heliocentrism is reflected in the pagan wheel of the year on the surface of St. Peter’s Square in front of St. Peter’s Church (see www.canadafirst.net/our_heritrage/solstice/). Since 1944, a theatrical representation of the Inti Raymi has been taking place at Sacsayhuaman (one mile from Cusco) on June 24 of each year, attracting thousands of local visitors and tourists.
The Roman historian Pliny observed in his Natural History: “We are so much at the mercy of chance that Chance herself, by whom God is proved uncertain, takes the place of God”. Like in Ch. Darwin’s books. In contradistinction, the Torah stresses: “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven.” (Ecc 3:1) So, God designed the solstices for a purpose. Can this purpose be discerned? The answer is a resounding yes. The solstices are the most convincing proof of the truth of the God inspired Torah’s astronomy. If the sun, having reached the solstitial tropics, reversed its spiral movement without staying on the same orbit for a few days we would not have this formidable argument against the heliohoax.
In order to fully comprehend this problem imagine substituting the speeding earth for the spiraling sun. The dead end arises when you try to explain a few days of the same length in the helioscheme. Because in this scheme the earth moves on the circular orbit of the ecliptic i.e. it moves downward or upward which also means that for half a year the days age growing shorter or on the upward turn – longer. They never stay the same, not on a few consecutive days of the year. In order to explain the solstices in heliocentrism we have to assume that at a certain point of of its travel the earth comes to a sudden stop, or, that its speed goes down from 20 miles per second to 0, and after a few days it suddenly jumps from 0 to 20 miles per second. Apocalyptic consequences of such an assumption for the life on earth are obvious unless you are so blinded by your helioreligion that you reject any rational argument. And besides, such an assumption thrashes the boondoggle of Newton’s Principia.
If the earth stands still for a few days it means that after that it has to increase its speed to make up for this delay, but that also means that covering more distance, thanks to the increased speed, would result in disproportionate increase of daylight on the upward travel of the earth and respectively decrease on the downward turn. Keep in mind the difference: the trajectory of the sun in geocentrism is spiral; the trajectory of the earth in the helioscheme is circular or elliptical if you prefer Kepler and Newton to Copernicus and Galileo.
When you introduce the moon into the solstitial equation, you’ll have to conclude that the solstitial areas are governed by a totally different set of physical laws that contradict the boondoggle hidden behind the Newton’s apple.
The authors who by their tables of date and time of solstices and equinoxes point to the empirically verifiable fact of the “sun” reaching the highest or lowest points in its travel around the earth miss the point, namely that it is the earth that stands still in declination (See, for example, the table of summer and winter solstices set up by the British National Maritime Museum at www.ac.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.3843) . The assertion that the summer solstices are the longest and shortest days of the year, and, that after the solstice, the days begin to get shorter or longer are simply not true. But on such false descriptions the helioboondoggle thrives since centuries.
Let me confront them with astronomical facts that totally destroy these deceptive manipulations. I will use for my presentation a Soviet calendar of the year 1989 because the Soviet astronomers are beyond any suspicion that they might manipulate the astronomical data. Copernicus being highly praised by K. Marx and F. Engels was embraced by them as a patron “saint” of their materialistic, atheistic ideology.
Here is their time of sunrises and sunsets on a few consecutive days in June and December of 1989: on June 20 the sun rose at 4.43 and set at 22.20; on June 21 again, sunrise at 4.43 and sunset at 22.20; on June 22, the same, sunrise at 4.43 and sunset at 22.20 and finally, on June 23 still the same, sunrise at 4.43 and sunset at 22.10. So, in effect we have not one longest day but four. Only on June 24 the sun rose one minute later (at 4.44) and set one minute later (at 22.21). We have the same situation on June 25, which means that we have 6 longest days of 17 h 37′ daylight. For four consecutive days the earth stood still in declination, which literally means that it did not move upward on its elliptical trajectory. Then it moved a little bit up to stand again for two days.
In the same year the Soviets had seven shortest days of 6 h 57′ daylight between December 18 and 24 although not in the same time frame: on Dec. 18 and 19 the sun rose at 8:58 and set at 15.55; on Dec. 20 and 21 the sun rose at 8.59 and set at 15.56; on Dec. 22 and 23 the sun rose at 9.00 and set at 15.57 and on Dec 24 the sun rose at 9.01 and set 15.58
In other words, in 1989 the earth stood still for 13 days. In helioscheme the earth covers the distance of 1, 728.000 miles per day and night and that means that on the remaining part of its trajectory the earth had to make up for over twenty million miles. Nobody, so far, explained the causes of these sudden stops and jump start accelerations.
In the year 2002 the Poles had only two longest days: on June 20 (sr 4.14- ss 21.01)* and on June 21 (sr 4.14 – ss 21.01). June 22 was one minute shorter. During the winter solstice they had the shortest day on December 21 (sr 7.43 – ss 15.25). But here is a surprise, December 22 was one minute longer (sr 7.43 – ss 15.26) but December 23 was, contrary to the rule, one minute shorter, exactly like the shortest day, although in a different time frame sr 7.44 – ss 15.26). December 24 was one minute longer (sr 7.44 – ss 15.27) but December 25 was again one minute shorter (sr 7.45 – 15.27). The Polish proverb says that it is only on New Year’s Day that the daylight is really longer “by a ram’s jump” (Na Nowy Rok przybywa dnia na barni skok).
*According to the table set up by the National Maritime Museum the summer solstice in 2002 occurred on 21 June, 13.24*According to the same source, the winter solstice occurred 22 December, 07.04
Consider in this context the dogmas of Copernicus’s contradicted by the results of Kepler’s researches.. The Polish Bombastes Furioso aka Sir Lucius O’Trigger hypothesized:
Planets move in perfect circlesPlanets move in constant speedSun at the center of these orbits
But Kepler showed:
Planets move in ellipsesPlanetary speed varies constantlySun is not quite at the center of the planetary orbits
Which “heliotruth” do you believe in? Is International Space Station moving in a perfect circle or rather in a perfect ellipse? Does it move in constant speed or rather its speed varies constantly? How do you drink water in zero gravity? I reflect on this question day and night since I saw the picture of the toilet installed aboard the ISS. Believe me, it’s a real monster.
Comment by Roman Pytel — November 30, 2007 @ 11:59 am
Galileo was a rather celebrated and frequent visitor to the Jesuit Roman College. His friendship with members of the Society of Jesus started in 1587, when, at the age of 23, he met Clavius, and continued for the rest of his life. The number and contents of Galileo's letters to Clavius show that he was a good friend of Clavius. The latter was able to needle Galileo about seeing Jupiter's four moons only because Galileo drew them on the lens of his telescope (One of his many confidence tricks). Other letters demonstrate the fact that Clavius' support for the heliocentric teaching was the preponderant reason for its acceptance among the learned. In the time of his distress it was to Jesuits like Clavius that Galileo turned. At one point the Jesuits of the Roman college having confirmed his discoveries of the motion of the earth honored Galileo with a three day celebration.
Otto Struve, of Pulkova, announced in 1873 that he had observed the dark companion of Procyon, whose existence had been suspected, on theoretical grounds, by Bessel (1844) and Auvers (1861). He continued, for some years, to publish his observations of it. It was then discovered to be an optical illusion, due to flaw in his object glass, which was found to give similar spurious companions to Arcturus, Capella, and Regulus.
GALILEO’S HUMAN EXPERIENCE AND REASONING
On the 100th anniversary of A. Einstein’s birth (Oct. 16, 1979), the pope made an admission: “The greatness of Galileo is comparable to that of Einstein, something recognized by all. The difference is that today, in the presence of the College of Cardinals…we are honoring Einstein, whereas Galileo was made to suffer a great deal…by the men and the organization of the Church.” 13 years later, in Oct. 1992 the pope declared that “Galileo, a sincere believer, showed himself to be more perceptive…than the theologians who opposed him.” The worst part of the Galileo error, the pope wrote, was that it “helped to anchor a number of scientists of good faith in the idea that there was an incompatibility between the spirit of science and its rulers of research on one hand, and the Christian faith on the other…a tragic mutual incomprehension…The Bible does not concern itself with the details of the physical world, the understanding of which is the competence of human experience and reasoning. There exist two realms of knowledge, one that has its source in Revelation and one that reason can discover by its own power…The distinction between the two…ought not to be understood as opposition. The methodologies proper to each make it possible to bring out different aspects of reality.” Knowledge that Reason can discover says: when in 1623 Galileo described how, if you whirl round in a circle holding out a pan of water with a ball in it, the ball will revolve in a contrary direction, he was defending Copernicus’s introduction of the idea of contrary rotation to explain celestial mechanics. But Galileo did not bother to explain who was holding out the pan with rotating earth in it! And the pope spurned the problem as well. It is not true, in spite of the pope’s assertion to the contrary, that Knowledge that has its source in Revelation does not concern itself with the details of the physical world. It does!
Consider the very revealing fact that in the Bible the number pi=3 and not 3.14. For Plato the certainty of mathematics (i.e. p=3.14) had been essential training for philosopher, “because he must rise above the world of change and grasp true being; it will tend to draw the soul towards truth and direct upwards the philosophic intelligence which is now wrongly turned earthwards; it forces the mind to arrive at pure truth by the exercise of pure thought.” Col 2:8 warns “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” In Riemannian elliptical space the circumference of a circle is always smaller than 2 pi times its radius. Accordingly, a Tennessee legislator suggested the value be legally fixed at 3, exactly like in the Hebrew Bible. It took more than 2000 years that the learned world could understand the deeper meaning of the Biblical Mathematics!
Osiander observed in his preface to Copernicus's book: "Since different hypotheses are sometimes available to explain one and the same motion...an astronomer will prefer to seize on the one which is easiest to grasp; a philosopher will perhaps look more for probability; but neither will grasp or convey anything certain, unless it has been divinely revealed to him."
Einstein's Greatness? Consider how deceitfully his dogma that the light is bent in the gravitational field was confirmed: No suitable stars were close to the sun during the eclipse period. And in addition to many technical difficulties. On the big day itself, the weather was cloudy. When the results proved inconclusive, Eddington set about massaging the data (sexing up the data, the Anglican scientists love the Jews who, like A. Einstein, despise the Torah), summarily discarding photographs that failed to confirm his pre-established views and suppressing contradictory evidence gathered by other eclipse teams. Many scientists were already converted to Einstein ideas and Eddington drew on his influential contacts to convince them that his expedition demonstrated the truth they wanted to hear. Nevertheless, some experts remained sceptical, and two decades went by before American astronomers were converted. (Patricia Fara, Science.p, 250f)
On 25 May 1977 I delivered at the Polish Oriental Society a lecture about Geocentric Astronomy of the Book of Job –“He stretched out the North over the empty place and hangeth the earth upon nothing” (Job 26:7) – A heliocentric diagram from the period before Joshua’s conquest unearthed in Israel confirms that the ancient Jews knew the heliocentric system elaborated later by Pythagoras, but rejected it (The Babylonian epic Enuma Elish mentions that the sun god Marduk established the orbit of the earth around the sun). The Biblical Secretaries of God knew about the relativity of the sunlight and therefore could not accept the heliocentric sun as the Light of the World and a Visible God (Darkness is also light for those creatures that can see in night, like owls and many other). My article “At the Sources of the Copernican Heliocentrism” was printed in the “Urania” 1/1981/LII, monthly of the Polish Association of the Friends of Astronomy. I pointed out in that paper that Copernicus did not prove immobility of the sun scientifically i.e. mathematically; rather he embraced the philosophical dogma that the sun being a god must rest (cp. Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover): “Moreover, the state of immobility is being considered more noble and more divine than the state of mutability and instability, which for that reason should be ascribed rather to the earth than to the universe (i.e. fixed stars and the sun) (De revol. I, 8 Polish edition of 1976, p. 18)
Roman Pytel Ph.D., poles4torah
http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/

Heliocentrism is Masonic Astronomy

Where the Steel turns into “butter” Roman Pytel — August 18, 2007 @ 7:09 am
Robert H. Brown w in his book Stellar Theology and Masonic Astronomy (New York. 1882, p. 31) calls heliocentrism Masonic Astronomy. “C. Fred Kleinknecht, head of NASA at the time of the Apollo Space Program, is now the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Council of the 33rd Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry if the Southern Jurisdiction. It was his reward for pulling it off. All of the first astronauts were Freemasons. There is a photograph in the House of the Temple in Washington DC of Neil Armstrong on the moon’s surface (supposedly) in his spacesuit holding his Masonic Apron in front of his groin.” Buzz Aldrin, a member of Clear Lake Lodge No.1417, Seabrook, Texas, took an embroidered flag showing the insignia of the Scottish Rite Freemasons (Southern Jurisdiction) on his journey, commemorated by a medallion issued in 1979. In its May/June 2001 issue, Psychology Today carried an interview with Astronaut Buzz Aldrin. Aldrin and fellow astronaut, Neil Armstrong, were the first to walk on the Moon, in 1969. Aldrin, a Freemason, was said to have conducted a bizarre Masonic ritual on the moon.
The Nuremberg Chronicle is a pictorial history of the earth from creation to the 1490s and was published in 1493. Michael Wohlgemuth's pictorial interpretation of the Creation in Genesis shows only circles, like Copernicus's diagram, on the first four consecutive days. And then suddenly in the fifth picture the miracle of colorful life appears: a river, a tree on the bank and a bird singing on its branches. You won't see any trace of life in Copernicus's diagram which is all about movements only. But the greatest surprise expects us in the seventh picture showing God reposing above His finished product – a series of earth-centered spheres with everything in its proper place (2:1-3). The caption of the third sphere sphaera ignis teaches us that the earth is surrounded by a ring of fire. You won't find this ring of fire in Copernicus's book or diagram. It turns out that The Nuremberg Chronicle is right. The modern science confirmed that.
The Thermosphere is the layer above the mesopause. The gases of the thermosphere are even thinner than those in the mesosphere, but they absorb ultraviolet light from the sun. Because of that, the temperatures rise to 3,600º F (2,000º C) at the top. This is at the height of 430 miles (700 km) of the earth's surface. (Keep in mind the towers did not implode immediately. It took time for the buildings to burn, weaken and fall. Some people wonder how in the world can steel melt. It can melt around 1400-1450°C. 2650 degrees F. However it can begin to bend under heavy weight long before it reaches those temperatures depending on the weight the steel supports. I guess they have never seen a steel factory as I have. http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/109255-911_conspiracies-0)
Now, let me quote a short passage from the Epilogue of the book mentioned previously First on the Moon:
“Look at the command module itself – the only component of the 363-foot-high Apollo-Saturn assembly that does come safely back to earth. A substantial fraction of its weight consists of the massive heat shield that protects it during reentry into the atmosphere, and therefore serves no purpose at all during the last hundred miles of the half-million mile round trip.” We don't know what material was used for this shield because even tungsten or wolfram widely used in space missiles and other equipment that must withstand high temperatures, melts at 3410ºC.
And here is a question and an answer from an interview of Bill Keysing for Nardwuar the Human Serviette:
NTHS: Doesn’t NASA say that the reason there were no stars is because their cameras weren’t set for the proper exposure, isn’t that their line?
BK: That’s their line and that’s pure baloney, because I’ve talked to photographic experts who say that NASA have all the money in the world to have a camera that would have taken magnificent pictures of stars. But there’s a little problem, you know, the temperature on the moon is 250ºF during the lunar day, and a friend of mine put some film in an oven and ran it up to 250º F and the film just curled up. If you notice that the Hasselblad camera is worn outside of the astronaut’s suit and it is not curled in any way. So that camera would have heated up to the temperature to bake cookies in a very short time, because the Sun on the moon is absolutely relentless, there’s no atmosphere to mitigate the heat of the Sun. So it’s obvious that the pictures that they brought back were not taken on the moon, nor could they have actually taken any picture on the moon, even if they had gone there.
NASA FAKED A SHUTTLE IMAGE!!!!!
BABloggee parkylondon alerted me to this NASA image of the Space Shuttle Atlantis’s cockpit, taken in March 2000 during mission STS-101. He sent me a note via Twitter telling me how much he liked it, but as soon as I saw it I smelled a rat. A SPACE SHUTTLE-sized rat. The picture showed stars!
It is strange but not a single star could be seen on the pictures of the Moon flight. Stars are even brighter in space than as seen from the Earth. Instead, there was blue light streaming into the illuminators of the space ship, at the time when it is known that open space is absolutely black.
The thermosphere extends from an altitude of 100 km, which means that the astronauts sojourned for a while in a fiery furnace 600 km long. There is total silence in their logbook on the stretch between 177 miles and 3,140 miles distances from the earth. The astronauts and most encyclopedias keep mum on the temperature of the thermosphere for obvious religious reasons. According to the Koran, Muhammad ascended to heaven from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem on the horse Buraq which had four human heads (In Polish folklore, a certain Twardowski ascended to the moon on a cock). In Soviet artist Belov’s huge painting Space Brothers, c. 1980, the figures on horseback carry the symbols of Soviet Russia triumphantly into space. The Soviets assimilated the Islamic religious imagery for political purposes. Keep in mind that their space missions were launched from the aerodrome at Bajkonur which is in Kazakhstan, a Muslim country. Politically, any mission into space is a minefield.
Religion enters the picture of First on the Moon on July 20. During a service in the Webster Presbyterian Church, of which Buzz Aldrin was an elder, the Reverend Dean Woodruf said in his sermon: “When self-fulfillment and fulfillment are put together perfectly we are what we are meant to be. This is what Nietzsche developed in his idea of the “Superman.” This is not a new biological species but a new kind of man who realizes his capacity for self-transcendence and self-fulfillment. This is what Nietzsche meant when he spoke through Zarathustra: 'Bless the cup which is about to overflow, so that the water, golden flowing out of it, may carry everywhere the reflection of thy rapture. Lo! This cup is about to empty itself again, and Zarathustra will once more become a man.” As you may recall, Nietzsche's Uebermensch (superman) was pictured as a “blond, blue-eyed beast”. Incidentally, N. Armstrong is a blond, blue-eyed man (or beast, if you prefer the Darwinian jargon) and has a statue of the Buddha (with a swastika on his chest) in his apartment. Recently, he paid a visit to Israel.
Well, in the cartoon The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron, an episode titled The 'N' Men had Jimmy and his friends careening out of control through the Van Allen radiation belt, giving them all superpowers based on what each was doing at the moment they went through the radiation belt. This situation parodies the origins of the Fantastic Four.
The Reverend Woodruf preached his sermon while the astronauts were traveling through the Van Allen Belts.
Between 50 km and 85 km above the ground Mesosphere extends. The temperatures in this zone drop to -184º F (-120º C) at the mesopause.
A test pilot named Joe Kittinger jumped from 74,000 feet. Near 40,000 feet, his thermometer read 98 degrees below zero, but his pressure suit, which was electrically heated, kept all but his legs warm. When Kittinger landed in the desert, thirteen minutes and 45 seconds after leaving the gondola, only his right hand bore any evidence of his journey from space. On that side, the glove had failed to pressurize, and the hand had inflated to almost twice its normal size. The swelling went down eventually, but the memory of a hostile sky stayed with him.” Man will never conquer space,” Kittinger had told his crew over the radio before he leaped. “He will learn to live with it, but he will never conquer it.” (Burkhard Bilger, Falling The New Yorker, Aug 13, 2007)
William Cooper wrote:
“NASA was created to make interstellar travel believable. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon. No man has ever ascended higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the earth’s surface. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. Any intelligent student with a basic physics can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings.” http://harvest-trust.org/majestyt.htm
If the Muslims can believe in Muhammad ascending to heaven on a horse, millions of others can believe in the Apollo landing on the moon. People always need to believe in something.
Peeping into the Mind of Newton:
Newton was a Cambridge Platonist. Let's peep into the mind of the Cambridge Platonist Henry More. In his Antidote to Atheism (1668), he warmly defended the story of a “witch” who had been married to Satan for 30 years; and he thought it sheer blasphemy to question the ability of witches to raise storms by incantation, or ride on a broom. He so purified himself in body that his urine had the fragrance of violets (Gandhi used to wash himself with his urine and was a violent anti-Semite, because the Jews refuse to do that)
Don't you dare to doubt that they can go the moon on their brooms!
The radical lesbian feminist Mary Daly, a brilliant woman has become totally committed to this new worldview.(New Age) In her various books, like Pure Lust and another one called Outercourse: The Be-Dazzling Voyage, she describes the meeting of radical witch feminists on the other side of the moon. Thousands of liberated women from the past and the present are gathered on the other side of the moon… you understand this is just playful… and in this gathering there is enormous rage against patriarchy... And so these women howl in unison as a sort of liturgical chant: "For peace and love we ever yearn, but some do wrong and never learn. This time it won’t be us that burn. Another New Age channeler, Ken Carey, says, "The great day of purification has begun...”
“For you (Nebuchadnezzar) have said in your heart: I will ascend to Heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God...I will ascend above the heights of the clouds and will be like the most High” (Isa 14:13ff)
“Yet you shall be brought down to She'ol, to the sideas of the pit.” (Isa 14:15)
“Upon this rock...” (Mt. 16:18) A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 is a fake.
Telegraph Aug 29, 2009
Curators at Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the “lunar rock”, valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood.
Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation, said the museum would continue to keep the stone as a curiosity.
The rock was given to Willem Drees, a former Dutch leader, during a global tour by Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin following their moon mission 50 years ago.
J. William Middendorf, the former American ambassador to the Netherlands, made the presentation to Mr Drees and the rock was then donated to the Rijksmuseum after his death in 1988.
“I do remember that Drees was very interested in the little piece of stone. But that it’s not real, I don’t know anything about that,” Mr Middendorf said.
Nasa gave moon rocks to more than 100 countries following lunar missions in 1969 and the 1970s.
The United States Embassy in The Hague is carrying out an investigation into the affair.
Researchers Amsterdam’s Free University were able to tell at a glance that the rock was unlikely to be from the moon, a conclusion that was borne out by tests.
Apollo moon rocks lost in space? No, lost on Earth
September 15, 2009, AP Sep 14, 2009 By TOBY STERLING
The detection of a fake moon rock in the Netherlands’ national museum should serve as a wake-up call for more than 130 countries who received gifts of lunar rubble from both the Apollo 11 flight in 1969 and Apollo 17 three years later. The Misidentification raised questions about how well countries have safeguarded their presents from Washington.
NASA keeps most of the 382 kilograms (842 lbs) gathered by the Apollo missions locked away, giving small samples to researchers and lending a set of larger rocks for exhibitions.
Apollo 11 gift rocks typically weigh just 0.05 grams, scarcely more than a grain of rice. The Apollo 17 gift rocks weigh about 1.1 grams. Both are encased in plastic globes to protect them and ease viewing.
The Amsterdam case appears to be not fraud but the result of poor vetting by the Rijksmuseum.
Spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder said the museum checked with NASA after receiving the rock in 1992 from the estate of the late Prime Minister Willem Drees. NASA told the museum, without seeing it, that it was “possible” it was a moon rock.
But it weighed a whopping 89 grams (3.1 ounces). In addition, its gold-colored cardboard plaque does not describe it as a moon rock.
The U.S. ambassador gave Drees the rock during an Oct. 9, 1969 visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts to the Netherlands. Drees’s grandson, also named Willem, told the AP his grandfather had been out of office for more than a decade and was nearly deaf and blind in 1969, though his mind was still sharp.
“My guess is that he did not hear well what was said,” said the grandson. “He may have formed his own idea about what it was.”
The family never thought to question the story before donating the rock, to which it had not attached great importance or monetary value.
The Marvels of the Moon
Roman Pytel — February 8, 2008 @ 1:19 pm
It would be nice to pretend, as the so-called theistic evolutionists do, that the study of evolution can be carried out without having any effect on religion. The heart of the matter is that evolution is, by definition, a story of origins, like the myth of Tammus, or Mithra and of many others. This means that it really does supersede another creation story – in particular, the creation story as the very core of Judeo-Christian narrative.
Indian religious philosophy regards the universe as resulting from a non purposive manifestation of, or emanation from, an absolute unity that is not personal in any strict sense.
In the Assyrian inscriptions we find recorded the Chaldeo-Babylonian idea of an evolution of the universe out of the primeval flood or “great deep,” and of the animal evolution out of the earth and sea (cp. Darwin's “warm pond”.
The general idea of evolution in Nature, transmitted from the Chaldeans through the Phoenicians, took strong hold upon Greek thought and was developed in many perverse ways; Aristotle sometimes developed it in a manner which reminds us of modern views.
Hand in hand with evolutionism goes the idea that the Universe is built of four basic elements. In ancient Greece, at the very dawn of philosophy itself, a group who are now called atomists (particularly Leucippus and Democritus) postulated that all matter was formed of “atoms”, which were small, hard and indestructible. They taught that the atoms moved in a void, and that it was in eternal fallings and collisions of them that creates everything in the world (in modern Science, these fallings and collisions were initiated by “Big Bang”). By postulating the void that all atoms “fell” with relation to, they were perhaps the first explicit absolutists in history. They inspired Newton's absolute Space. He speculated, If ever Space had not existed, God at that time would have been nowhere.
Before the end of the 16th century, Galileo has begun experimenting with inclined planes and pendula, and had come up with some remarkable results, including that all objects “fall” (or roll down the inclined plane) at the same rate, regardless of their mass or the steepness of the slope. (Accordingly, Einstein argued: “Just as in the case with the electric field produced by electromagnetic induction, the gravitational field has similarly only a relative existence. For if one considers an observer in free fall, e.g. From the roof of a house, there exist for him during his fall no gravitational field -at least in his immediate vicinity. For if the observer releases any objects, they will remain relative to him in a state of rest, or in a state of uniform motion, independent of their particular chemical or physical nature. (In this consideration one must naturally neglect air resistance.) The observer therefore is justified to consider his state as one of “rest”).
Let me remind here that Galileo, using his telescope, claimed that he saw the detail of the moon that is invisible to the naked eye. This claim was consistent with the fundamental heliocentric dogma that the earth is one of heavenly planets and in this sense the title of Copernicus's book is to be understood, The Rebvolutions of the heavenly bodies.
Galileo's renderings revealed the moon shadows as craters, hills and valleys. Identifying such Earthlike topography in a heavenly “body” was an important step toward the conclusion that later put him at odds with the Catholic Church: that Earth was not the center of the universe.
Do they see rains on the Moon with their telescopes?
T. Campanella in his Apologia pro Galileo (Frankfurt 1623) was well aware that Galileo's inspiration for seeing the detail of the moon that is invisible was derived from the same source as Muhammad's claim about billions upon billions of virgins inhabiting the “heavenly bodies” built of four philosophical elements. He wrote:
“Galileo also says that water exists on the moon and the planets which cannot be. These bodies are incorruptible, for do not all scholastics contend with Aristotle that they endure without change throughout all time? He describes land and mountains in the Moon and other celestial globes, and not only vilifies immeasurably the homes of angels, but lessens our hope regarding Heaven.
“If the four elements which form our world exist in the stars, it follows from the doctrine of Galileo that, as Muhammed declared, there are many worlds with lands and seas and with human inhabitants. In Surah Fatiha Allah is called the “Lord of the Worlds” (plural). However, Scripture speaks of only one world and of one created man, so that this belief is opposed to Scripture. I pass without comment the opinion that Galileo has revived the heresy that Christ must make atonement for the men who inhabit the stars and die there again; just as formerly it was said that Christ must be crucified a second time in the antipodes, if the men living there were to be saved as we have been saved. In other words, Galileo's Christ was a perpetual pilgrim, like John Paul II was.
Muhammad, for political reasons, rejected the idea of the Biblical Eden planted by God in earth and embraced instead the idea of the Garden of Immortality that the Babylonian myth placed in Heaven. Unlike the Biblical Adam who was simply “sent forth from the garden of Eden” (Gen. 3:23), the Koran's Adam was “sent down from the Garden” (Sura Ta-Ha 20:123). Similarly, in the so-called Gospel of Marcion Jesus was sent down, maybe from a hanging, heavenly garden,” like a certain Clark Kent who can live in Smallville, like huris can live up there:
In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar,
Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea,
Jesus descended (out of heaven) into Capernaum, a city in Galilee,
and was teaching (in the synagogue) on the Sabbath days,
And they were astonished at his doctrine (3:1/4:31)
Muhammad, like the Babylonian godman Etana ascended to heaven on the horse called Buraq. And remember all those terrorists on the way to the Virgins. Where do they get all those virgins from?
Newton took both impenetrability, and the lawlike behavior of bodies, to be essential features of our conception of body. Inspired by Lucretius' idea of “Fall”, as described in his De rerum natura he imagined the planets are falling to their common center of gravity like apples are falling to the ground of earth.
The first telescopic observations of the moon on record were carried out by the Englishman Thomas Harriot (c. 1560-1621), on the evening of July 26, 1609. However, based on his extant correspondence as well as entries in his notebooks, as in the case of sunspots Harriot did not appear to have drawn any particular physical significance from what he saw.
We know that some people can see phases of Venus with naked eye and maybe Moses was one of them.
One cannot help but wonder, is the moon a heavenly body (like a habitatation for material girls, or huris) in the Copernican sense, or is it a light serving as a sign, comparable to Venus?: “And God said,. 'Let there be lights in the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years.” (Gen 1:14) The subjection of everything to a certain order is for man because this order enables man top exist as a living being.,
We learn from the Mishna Treatise Rosh Hashana 2:8 that “Rabban Gamliel had a chart of moon shapes on a wall, and he would show this to the people, and ask: Was it like this one? Like that one?” And that's exactly what the word 'sign' means.
The Russian Professor of astronomy A.B. Arkhipov in his book Nyerazgadannye Tainy Vsyelennoy (The Unsolved Secrets of the Universe) published in Moscow (2004 ISBN 5-94538-446-1) among the lunar marvels mentions the following astronomical events described in ancient chronicles:
1048 The Armenian Chronicle of Etaum Patmich of the 13th century reads: “In that year, on May 14, in the early night during the New Moon a star was visible on the disc of the Moon. According to Armenian astronomers Barsegyan and Parsamyan an attempt to identify this star with the supernova of 1054 means stretching the truth.
1064 “In those days a star of unusual brightness appeared within the circle of the moon after a few days following her moving away from the sun. J. Malvesius Chronicon (Muratori L.A. Retum Italicarium scriptores. Lib. 14. Milan, 1729, p. 873)
1540 W.S. Cameron's Lunar transient phenomena catalog (NSSDC/WDC-A-R&S 78-03, Greenbelt: NASA, 1978, p. 109) describes a strange engraving depicting a star which appeared On November 26 on the black part of the New Moon
The same catalog mentions that on March 5, 1587 many people saw a star within the circle of the Moon “exactly between the edges of her horns.”
On page 136 of Prof. Arkhipov's book you'll find two copies: one representing a Byzantine coin depicting a star within the horns of the New Moon (see the flag of Turkey and of other Muslim states) and a similar event as depicted by the pre-Columbian astronomers of Peru.
Cultural blindspots prevent people from seeing things that are perfectly obvious in other cultures. Furthermore, even within a culture that is capable of perceiving something, individuals usually cannot see things until they are educated to them Exactly, like Moses was educating his people by giving them the ordinance to look out for the New Moons.
So try it for yourself and you'll see with your naked eyes. You'll see the blue sky through the “cutout” of the new moon, and sometimes the black part of it, which, obviously blocks the view of the blue sky, but not always, contrary to Galileo's claim. And then, you will be bound to ask yourself the question, is Venus a body too if I can see blue sky through the cutout of its crescent. And then, maybe, you will admit that the earth created by G-d as our homeland is totally unique in the Universe. Exactly, like the Torah claims. Everything up there is to remind us of times, and seasons, and years and of other events important for our lives. And then you'll find easily the answer to the question why God created the heaven first: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. In such an astronomy the phases of Venus do not confirm the truth of the sun-centered world.