Continuing Scientific Legacy of the Nazi Germany

Aryan Science and the Jewish Holocaust
Big Bang theory referred to as Modern “Genesis” retired the Biblical Genesis because the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske imparted to the enthusiastic audiences his conviction that the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world. Oliver Stone in his laterst documentary series "Secret History of America" is rehabilitating Hitler and Stalin as typical scape goats of public opinion. In fact, the director argues they were both products of their historical period. Let me add here that Philosopher M. Polanyi observed, “Newtonian physics and Darwin’s notion of the survival of the fittest were key elements both in the Marxist concepts of class warfare and of racial philosophies which shaped Hitlerism and scientific world view.” Logically, we may expect that another Jewish Holocaust is unavoidable and it will be a product of John Paul II's rehabilitation of Criminal “Science.”
U.S. Envoy to Ukraine Slams Jews for Holocaust and Communism
The Chicago Tribune reported, ‘And official U.S. delegation sent to Ukraine’s recent presidential inauguration of Yushchenko included a Ukrainian-American who has accused Jews of manipulating the Holocaust for their gain and playing an “inordinate role” in the rise of Soviet communism.”
Myron Kuropas was selected by the White House to fly to Ukraine with then-Secretary of State Colin Powell as part of the American delegation. Mr. Kuropas wrote in 2000, “Big money drives the Holocaust industry. To survive, the Holocaust industry is always searching for its next mark. Ukraine’s turn is just around the corner.” He has argued elsewhere that Jews played a driving role behind Soviet leader Joseph Stalin’s murderous policies in Ukraine. Mr. Kuropas has demonstrated his hostility towards Jews for some time. Michael Kotzin, executive vice president of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, explained to the Chicago Tribune, “This is not new stuff…if you go back over the decades, he’s taken these kinds of positions highly antagonistic to the Jewish people and Jewish interests and causes.”
The Knight Ridder news service confirmed “three State Department officials said the delegation was assembled by the White House.”
“It is astounding that on the eve of commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps, President Bush’s staff would not even bother to look into Kuropas’ regular attacks on Jews and what he terms the ‘Holocaust industry before sending him to Ukraine with our Secretary of State, to represent the United States of America,’ said National Jewish Democratic Council Executive Director Ira N. Forman. This deeply embarrassing incident shows a lack of judgment on the part of the White House and, frankly, a lack of basic competence,” Forman added.
Israel Supports Russia’s Efforts to Preserve Truth about World War Two
URL: http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/111616-israel_russia-0, 12.01.2010
Israeli newspaper Maariv reported that Israeli President Shimon Peres played a significant role in recent Russian-American agreement regarding Europe-based missile defense shield system. In his phone conversations with Obama and during their personal meetings he insisted that abandoning the idea of basing missile defense in Europe was necessary. Why did he have to make efforts that would result in strengthening of Russia’s positions?
Avigdor Eskin, Israeli political analyst, shared his comments on the matter:
“The decision of OSCE that equates Soviet soldiers with Nazi monsters, revengeful attitudes and encouragement of a new wave of Nazism at the state level in Ukraine and Baltic countries, along with the USA’s intentions to locate missile defense near the Russian borders, is a new and dangerous round of attempts to destabilize the situation in the region. It is also an attempt to try new methods in shaping borders and spheres of influence.
The specific role that Israel took up in its eagerness to persuade Obama’s administration not to aggravate a conflict reflects the state strategy of Israel. In recent years, Peres revisited his old role of a recognized master of diplomacy. It is not surprising that he started the project of preventing basing a missile defense shield system in Poland and the Czech Republic and went through with it.
The question of the reasoning behind Israel’s attempt to stop the spread of the American influence in the former CIS countries is very appropriate. The processes associated with the attempts to create a blockade situation for Russia and build a new order in the region do not coincide with Israel’s interests.
In order to understand the essential differences between the interests of Israel and the USA in the post-Soviet region, let us imagine a possible continuation of Bush’s policy. Active revival of Nazism in Ukraine and the Baltic countries at some point started to gain momentum. Americans came to a conclusion that there was nothing good they could expect from these nations and that the only choice the said nations had was between the color of red (getting close with Russia), and the color of brown.
Washington considers the second option to be the lesser evil. A US ambassador in Kiev personally awarded graduates of the Security Service of Ukraine with stripes knowing very well that he was encouraging the supporters of the Nazi ideology. The Academy was recently named after Shukhevych, the leader of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. The US Department of State and CIA not only condone the spirit of revengefulness in Ukraine and in the Baltic countries, but consciously encourage it guided by the intentions not to allow Russia to return to these lands.
A possibility of further unification and consolidation of Ukraine and the Baltic countries on the basis of rehabilitation and revival of Nazism is encouraged externally by similar tendencies in Romania that can spread to Moldavia up to an attempt of aggression against Transdniestria.
Yet, as it often happens with the Americans, their fosterlings have a tendency to get out of control. It cannot be ruled out that these post-Soviet tendencies will become the third power in Europe between the liberal West and Russia.
Israel is concerned with the American project in Eastern Europe because the Russophobia implanted there is immediately interwoven with Judaeophobia. Regardless of instantaneous rewards that can be tempting for the Israeli government, the spread of Nazism across the post-Soviet territory will always remain a direct threat not only for Jewish communities, but for Israel itself.
As for Russia, today it serves as a stabilizer not only in the Western regions of the former USSR, but also in the Caucuses and Central Asia.If we look at separatist tendencies within Russia from Jerusalem, we will come to a conclusion that any scenario of Russia’s separation or collapse would cause strengthening of the anti-Israeli forces.
All these tendencies are dangerous for Israel. The enhancement of a popular attitude suggesting that every national group that declares itself a nation should create an independent country is also dangerous. “Right for a state” is a direct result of the liberal view of the world currently selectively used by the West, promoting double standards. In the context of the Israeli-Russian relations, the struggle against the attempts to falsify the history of World War II is particularly important.
Mocking and hypocritical decision of OSCE that equated Soviet soldiers with killer monsters removed the scales from eyes of many Russians, revealing the real face of Western politicians who followed their Baltic colleagues. The basis for claims against Russia by Baltic revenge seekers and other supporters of Nazis is being prepared. Israel is concerned with these tendencies . Dr. Yehuda Bauer, a leading Israeli historian and scholar of the Holocaust, fiercely rebuffed historians revising the history.
At a special meeting in Yad Vashem, Israeli memorial for Holocaust remembrance, devoted to the 70th anniversary of Molotov - Ribbentrop Pact, he paid special attention to the attempts of the history falsification. He said that World War II had its liberators, Russian soldiers. He stated that while someone may not appreciate the Soviet regime, it had nothing to do with the fact that the Germans were the occupants and monsters, while Russian soldiers were the heroes and liberators.
In other words, the attempts to re-write World War II history are directed both against Israel and Russia, hence mutual interests. It is now up to those who govern in Jerusalem and Moscow. Peres’s success in preventing American missile defense shield system based in Eastern Europe is a great example for cooperation. Will Russian leaders be wise enough to act in compliance with the real geopolitical vectors? Will they be able to promote real interests of our peoples or will they continue encouraging the liberalization processes, entropy and territorial concessions?”
Avigdor Eskin , Pravda.Ru
LifeSiteNews.com Tuesday September 12, 2006
Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: “Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution”
Regensburg, Germany, September 12, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com This morning Pope Benedict XVI discussed evolution in his homily at the outdoor Mass celebrated in Islinger Field. In a direct attack on the concept of random chance evolution, Pope Benedict asked rhetorically: “What came first? Creative Reason, the Spirit who makes all things and giveth them growth, or Unreason, which, lacking any meaning, yet somehow brings forth a mathematically ordered cosmos, as well man and his reson.”
The Pope explained that the belief in God as Creator comes in the most ancient profession of faith known to Christians, The Apostle's Creed. “As Christians, we say: I believe in God the Father, the Creator of heaven and earth – I believe in the creator Spirit. We believe that at the beginning of everything is the eternal Word, with Reason and not Unreason,” he said.
Polish scientists fight creationism:
"No Reasonable Scientist Denies the Theory of Evolution"
autor: PAP, ar, 2006-10-19, Ostatnia aktualizacja
The Senate of the Warsaw Universirty declared just two weeks after the Pope's statement in Regensburg. The theory of evolution is commonly accepted by the scientists and it makes no sense to put it vis-a-vis creationism because creationism is no Science, said the spokesman of the Warsaw University. This statement was a reaction to the enunciations of politicians who maintained that evolution should not be taught in schools. In other words, unlike John Paul II, this Pope is no Reasonable Scientist. The opposition of Polish authorities to the German Pope materialized in the decision to build a Centre of Science Kopernik in Warsaw.
Nature 443, 890-891 (26 October 2006)
Almut Graebsch
Abstract
Deputy education minister calls evolution a 'lie'.
Fifty leading scientists in Poland have signed an open letter in protest against an aggressive anti-evolution campaign launched by the League of Polish Families (LPR), the ultra-right-wing coalition partner in the conservative Polish government."The theory of evolution is a lie," Mirosaw Orzechowski, Poland's deputy education minister, told the newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza on 14 October.
Atheists of All Countries Unite
In November 2006 a new Center for Inquiry held its inaugural press conference in Washington, D.C. Its aim? To “promote and defend reason, science, and freedom of inquiry in all areas of human endeavor.” This was deemed necessary because of the resurgence of fundamentalist religions across the nation, and their alliance with political-ideological movements to block science.” Prominent scientists signed a declaration lamenting the “persistence of paranormal and occult beliefs” and “retreat into mysticism.” Their contention was that public policies should be shaped by secular values (i.e. by atheistic values) and that science and secularism are “inextricably linked.” If they are, and if Richard Dawkins (b. 1941) is right to regard the existence of God as a vulnerable “scientific hypothesis”, it seems reasonable to assert that scientific progress has been the prinicapl cause of secularization.
Evangelist D. James Kennedy’s Florida-based television and radio organization, Coral Ridge Ministries, has produced a TV documentary and a book linking the Holocaust to the theory of evolution. Called Darwin’s Deadly Legacy, the documentary aired Aug. 26-27 on Christian cable networks and about 200 television stations across the country. It is now being sold on DVD along with the companion book, Evolution’s Fatal Fruit: How Darwin’s Tree of Life Brought Death to Millions. Both describe the Nazis’ embrace of eugenics and social Darwinism, their attempt to build a master race and to justify racism, slavery and even murder as survival of the fittest.
In 2006, the National Religious Broadcasters association inducted Kennedy into its Hall of Fame. As a result of a heart attack from which he never fully recovered, Kennedy last preached at Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church later that year, on December 24, 2006. His retirement was officially announced at the church on August 26, 2007.
Atheist clubs are springing up in American high schools,
warns head of US Catholic bishops
by Damian Thompson, Telegraph
Reposted from: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100012851/atheist-clubs-are-springing-up-in-american-high-schools-warns-head-of-us-catholic-bishops/ A “triumphalistic, self-righteous atheism” inspired by the work of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris is winning a following among American young people, leading to “atheist clubs” in high schools, according to Cardinal Francis George of Chicago. The cardinal, who is President of the US Catholic Bishops’ Conference, says that unbelief among young people is more than a question of stopping going to church: it is part of a fashionable “new atheism” which is every bit as intolerant as Christian fundamentalism. He told John Allen of the National Catholic Reporter: “In Chicago, we now have atheist clubs in high schools. We didn’t have those five years ago. Kids I would have confirmed in the eighth grade, by the time they’re sophomores in high school say they’re atheists. They don’t just stop going to church, they make a statement. I think that’s new. That’s perhaps a bit more like Europe.”
YouTube is crawling with videos by articulate, friendly American teenagers and university students proclaiming their uncompromising atheism; indeed, atheism is one of the fastest-growing movements in the 18-25 age group, casting doubt on old assumptions that the religious impulse is somehow hard-wired into the American psyche. (Wednesday, October 7, 2009 )
Making a Monkey Out of Darwin
Pat Buchanan
"You have no notion of the intrigue that goes on in this blessed world of science," wrote Thomas Huxley. "Science is, I fear, no purer than any other region of human activity; though it should be."
As "Darwin's bulldog," Huxley would himself engage in intrigue, deceit and intellectual property theft to make his master's theory gospel truth in Great Britain.
He is quoted above for two reasons.
First is House passage of a "cap-and-trade" climate-change bill. Depending on which scientists you believe, the dire consequences of global warming are inconvenient truths — or a fearmongering scheme to siphon off the wealth of individuals and empower bureaucrats.
The second is publication of "The End of Darwinism: And How a Flawed and Disastrous Theory Was Stolen and Sold," by Eugene G. Windchy, a splendid little book that begins with Huxley's lament.
That Darwinism has proven "disastrous theory" is indisputable.
"Karl Marx loved Darwinism," writes Windchy. "To him, survival of the fittest as the source of progress justified violence in bringing about social and political change, in other words, the revolution."
"Darwin suits my purpose," Marx wrote. Darwin suited Adolf Hitler's purposes, too.
"Although born to a Catholic family Hitler become a hard-eyed Darwinist who saw life as a constant struggle between the strong and the weak. His Darwinism was so extreme that he thought it would have been better for the world if the Muslims had won the eighth century battle of Tours, which stopped the Arabs' advance into France. Had the Christians lost, (Hitler) reasoned, Germanic people would have acquired a more warlike creed and, because of their natural superiority, would have become the leaders of an Islamic empire."
Charles Darwin also suited the purpose of the eugenicists and Herbert Spencer, who preached a survival-of-the-fittest social Darwinism to robber baron industrialists exploiting 19th-century immigrants.
For 150 years, the fossil record has failed to validate Darwin. ((On 22 October 1996John paul said"...les nouvelles connaissances conduisent a reconnaitre dans la theorie de l'evolution plus qu'une hypothese", which means that the Pope lied -rp)
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontologists," admitted Stephen J. Gould in 1977. But that fossil record now contains even more species that appear fully developed, with no traceable ancestors.
Darwin ruled out such "miracles."
And Darwinists still have not explained the origin of life, nor have they been able to produce life from non-life.
The most delicious chapter is Windchy's exposure of the Scopes Monkey Trial and Hollywood's Bible-mocking movie "Inherit the Wind," starring Spencer Tracy as Clarence Darrow.
The trial was a hoked-up scam to garner publicity for Dayton, Tenn. Scopes never taught evolution and never took the stand. His students were tutored to commit perjury. And William Jennings Bryan held his own against the atheist Darrow in the transcript of the trial.
In 1981, Gould had this advice for beleaguered Darwinists: "Perhaps we should all lie low and rally round the flag of strict Darwinism ... a kind of old-time religion on our part." Exactly. Darwinism is not science. It is faith. Always was.
Patrick Buchanan, former White House Chief of Staff during Reagan presidency, a catholic is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
The End of Darwinism:The Cover-Up Gets Underway
by Eugene G. Windchy
After a conference of 160 biologists rejected Darwinism in 1980, Harvard University’s famous evolutionary biologist Stephen J. Gould declared the theory “dead” in a scientific journal. In 1981, however, Gould noticed a trend among his colleagues to “mute” debate on theory so as not to encourage the creationists , and he said, “Perhaps we should all lie low and rally around the flag of strict Darwinism—a kind of old time religion on our part.”
As a case in point, in 1999 I was amused to see how Gould rode to the rescue of Darwinism in Kansas, where the state school board voted to let the local school boards decide what to teach about evolution. Apparently outraged by this attack on the Darwinists’ united front, Gould wrote for Time magazine an essay titled, “Dorothy, It’s Really Oz.” In it the Harvard professor skillfully ridiculed the Kansas plan and he eloquently defended evolution as fact—without ever mentioning Darwin or his theory…In effect, Gould defended textbook Darwinism, which he had declared “dead,” while not saying a word about it.
Sitting in Cambridge, Massachusetts, did Gould know what exactly he was defending in Kansas (maybe that [fraudulent] giraffe?). I could not find out. Wanting to obtain a list of the state’s biology books, I telephoned long distance to the Kansas School Board, and a very uncooperative employee told me I would have to ask the individual schools—as if the board did not know what books it had authorized. The telephone company helped me to reach a high school, where a panicky biology teacher demanded, “Why are you singling me out?” Nothing would persuade the man to let me know what biology books were being used in his school.How did public education get to be secret education? Sir Walter Scott understood that sort of thing. In his familiar words, “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive.”
Eugene G. Windchy in 1967 left his position as the U.S. Information Agency’s Assistant Science Adviser to investigate the forgotten naval incidents that enabled United States participation in the Vietnam War. This led to his writing Tonkin Gulf, which was reviewed in the New York Times as "superb investigative reporting" (September 26, 1971).
Windchy wrote the New Republic’s analysis of the Pentagon Papers (August 7, 1971) and other articles for the Nation, Saturday Review, Atlantic, and the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. In another New Republic article (January 29, 1972) Windchy contested the settled academic opinion, among both historians and political scientists, that the president has constitutional authority to make war without the nation’s having been attacked. Windchy drew upon James Madison’s notes concerning the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to show that, in the absence of attack, only the Congress has the right to initiate war. He also debunked a State Department document that purported to show that on 125 occasions presidents had exercised the war power on their own initiative. These were insignificant incidents, and on one occasion the U.S. Navy actually fired on a U.S. Consulate.
Pope Benedict XVI Enlists the Help of Russian Scientists
Scientific Conference Refuting Evolution Theory to be held in Rome, Italy
The Scientific Impossibility of Evolution
November 9, 2009 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. St. Pius V University (Rome)
In Response to Pope Benedict XVI’s Call for Both Sides to be Heard
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - OCTOBER 16, 2009
The Scientific Revolution started dominating accounts of the past only after the Second Warld War, when historians optimistically (and unrealistically) predicted that science would provide a universal, secular faith to unite the world. Thomas Kuhn's name symbolizes current views that science lurches unpredictable, a fallible human endeavor swayed like any other by local influences, personal interests, and political pressures.
The 150th anniversary of Darwin’s "Origin of the Species" in November 2009 was the occasion for a unique conference at Pope Pius V University in Rome presenting a scientific refutation of evolution theory. According to Russian sedimentologist Alexander Lalamov, “Everything contained in Darwin’s Origin of Species depends upon rocks forming slowly over enormous periods of time. The November conference demonstrates with empirical data that such geological time is not available for evolution.” Recently returned from a ground-breaking geological conference in Kazan, sedimentologist Guy Berthault will present the findings of several sedimentological studies conducted and published in Russia. In one of these, the age of the rock formation surveyed was found to be 0.01% of the age attributed to it by the geological time-scale—instead of an age of 10 million years, the actual age was no more than one thousand years. “Contrary to the conventional wisdom,” Lalamov observed, “these rocks formed quickly, and the fossils they contain must be relatively young. This finding contradicts the evolutionary interpretation of the fossil record.” www.sedimentology.fr
According to US biophysicist Dr. Dean Kenyon, “Biological macroevolution collapses without the twin pillars of the geological time-scale and the fossil record as currently interpreted. Few scientists would contest this statement. This is why the upcoming conference concentrates on geology and paleontology. Recent research in these two disciplines adds powerful support to the already formidable case against teaching Darwinian macroevolution as if it were proven fact.”
Polish Scientists Strike Back
www.tehrantimes.com, Monday Jan. 11, 2010
4-legged animals emerged earlier than thought
LONDON (AP) -- The water-dwelling ancestors of modern-day mammals, reptiles and birds emerged onto land millions of years earlier than previously believed, researchers reported. A set of fossilized footprints show that the first tetrapods — a term applied to any four-footed animal with a spine — were treading open ground 397 million years ago, well before scientists thought they existed. An expert unconnected with the research said the find would force experts to reconsider a critical period in evolution when sea-based vertebrates took their first steps toward becoming dinosaurs, mammals and — eventually — human beings. “It blows the whole story out of the water, so to speak,” said Jenny Clack, a paleontologist at Cambridge University. Until now, scientists thought they had the evolution from fin to foot fairly well understood. The earliest tetrapods had been traced to 385 million years ago. Experts theorized that they had split from their close relatives, a fleshy-finned family of fish, a few million years earlier and then gone on to conquer land. But the new fossil footprints — uncovered between 2002 and 2007 in a disused quarry in central Poland — push the timing back by several million years, according to Grzegorz Pienkowski, the scientific director of the Polish Geological Institute in Warsaw, where most of the article's authors are based. He said the fossils had been securely dated from the deposits they were found with. Although at least some of the footprints may have been made in shallow water, paleontologist Per Ahlberg, one of the article's co-authors, said it was nevertheless clear from the shape of the toe prints and the nature of the sediment that the animals spent time walking around on land. “We know from the site that you have rain drop prints and mud cracks in the sediment,” he said, noting also that the prints appeared far too crisp to have been made underwater. The find also challenges the commonly accepted notion that tetrapods colonized the surface from lakes or river beds. Ahlberg and his colleagues argued that the footprints were first created in what was probably a lagoon-like environment at the time, adding that a coastal location made sense because shifting tides could strand small marine animals, giving our fishy forebears an incentive to explore open land.
Although she acknowledged their importance, Clack warned against drawing conclusions exclusively on small marks left by animals on the bottom of a muddy surface hundreds of millions of years ago. She said it would be critical to see fossil evidence of the creature that made the footprints before coming to any definitive conclusion on exactly how, when and where vertebrates came to colonize the earth's surface. She said some theorized that tetrapods originally went ashore to lay their eggs out of reach of water-going predators or that their ancestors grew legs to scurry from pool to pool. She said she had personally favored the notion that fish emerged from oxygen-deprived waters in order, quite literally, to catch their breath. All those theories were called into question by the Polish find, she said. It wouldn't be logical for fish to lay their eggs in a place where the tide would wash right over them, for example, and the pool-hopping behavior wouldn't make sense in a coastal environment. As for her oxygen hypothesis, Clack said “that's probably out the window.” The fossils suggested that tetrapods evolved well before marine oxygen levels started to drop, she said. Ahlberg said paleontologists were already scouring the area for more evidence of footprints — and fossils of the animals themselves. “Obviously the hunt is on,” he said.
In 2000 the British magazine New Scientist devoted a cover story urging readers to “Start Worrying Now” because “From Kansas to Korea, Creationism is Flooding the earth.” Although this development seemed almost “beyond belief”, the magazine described creationism as “mutating and spreading” around the world even linking up with the like-minded people in the Muslim world.” Just five years later representatives from national academies of science around the world joined in signing a statement supporting evolution and condemning the global spread of “theories not testable by science.” Contrary to all expectations, geographical theologial, and political barriers had utterly failed to contain what had begun as a distinctively American movement to create a Bible-based alternative to evolution. Did the Superpower, like the Soviet Union contain it? Where is the Soviet Union? God won't be mocked! Can Poland win the battle, the Soviet Union lost?
Zaginęło dwóch geologów. Wielkie poszukiwania
bdc 2010-01-10, ostatnia aktualizacja 2010-01-10 16:00:02.0
On January 10, 2010 the Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza reported that a black Nissan patrol with two Polish geologists Patelski Piotr – 26-year-old and his 23-year-old colleague disappeared from the face of the earth. On January 13, the choppers of border guard found the car in the river Narew. They continue looking for their bodies, or for their footprints, which, according to their belief, will stay as the proof of their existence for millions of years.
January 12, 2010. Italian Vaticanist Andrea Tornielli has published unedited material in his latest book on John Paul II, titled “Santo Subito” or “Immediate Saint”. In the book, he discloses never before heard testimonies, from those who knew John Paul II best. Tornielli hopes to shed some light on what made John Paul II a powerful figure.Andrea TornielliAuthor “Santo Subito”"He spoke with God. You would take one look at him and you knew that he was a person who talked frequently with God.” The book includes unedited episodes throughout his pontificate. For example, the times he would break protocol to visit with ill patients. On one occasion he received a patient in his private chapel who wanted to see him, even though the patient had not made a formal request.
The Pope has blood on his hands
The Pope did great damage to the church, and to countless Catholics
Terry Eagleton - Monday April 4, 2005 The Guardian
Terry Eagleton, professor of cultural theory at Manchester University in his Special report for Guardian Unlimited wrote: “John Paul acknowledged equality with nobody. From his early years as a priest, he was notable for his exorbitant belief in his own spiritual and intellectual powers. Graham Greene once dreamed of a newspaper headline reading “John Paul canonises Jesus Christ” Bishops were summoned to Rome to be given their orders, not for fraternal consultation. Loopy far-right mystics and Francoists were honoured, and Latin American political liberationists bawled out. The Pope's authority was so unassailable that the head of a Spanish seminary managed to convince his students that he had the Pope's personal permission to masturbate them. Marco Politi, Vatican correspondent for “La Repubblica, in his book La Confesione (2001) disclosed a network of gay priests throughout Italy. Well, the pedophile priests in the United States never were sent to a prison; they just paid for their perversions. Roman Polanski did the same, yet the US justice wants to put him into prison. He is Jewish and that explains his predicament.
John Paul II's “Fittest Man”
Reports that Pope John Paul II made an appeal to the British government for the release of Augusto Pinochet “for humanitarian reasons” provoked outrage from human rights groups and relatives of the victims of Pinochet's murderous regime in Chile. Vatican spokesman Joaquin Navarro Valls confirmed that the Pope had interceded on hehalf of the former Chilean dictator.
In Chile an organization representing relatives of the “disappeared” published an open letter to the Pope declaring, “The Catholic Church cannot teach that to kill, to disappear and to torture thousands of oppositionists can be crimes that are left unpunished.”
In Argentina, the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, the most prominent organization of relatives of the tens of thousands of victims of that country's military dictatorship of the 1970s and early 1980s, went further, accusing John Paul II of “defending assassins.”
“We address you as a common citizen, because it appears aberrant to us from the Papal throne in the Vatican, without knowing nor having suffered the electric prods, the mutilations, rapes, you decide, in the name of Jesus Christ, to ask clemency for the murderer,” read the letter that the group gave to the Papal Nuncio in Buenos Aires.
“Jesus was crucified and his flesh was lacerated by the Judases who like you today defended the assassins,” it continued.
In 1991, after the leaders of the militrary junta had been found guilty of political mass murder, torture and other crimes and susequently pardoned by Peronist President Carlos Menem, they joined him as guests of honor at a reception held by the Vatican's representative in Buenos Aires marking the thirteenthg anniversary of Wojtyla's ascension to the Papal throne. Http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/mar1999/pope-m04.shtml
Pinichet's Victims Museum
Chile is gearing up for a presidential run-off next Sunday after neither top candidate clinched a definitive win in the first round of voting.
Independent candidate Sebastian Pinera, a conservative billionaire, is in the lead at present against former president Eduardo Frei.It is the largest show of support an independent candidate has seen in recent history. The two main candidates faced off in a televised debate late on Monday as their campaigns reach the final stretch.
At the centre of that debate was Chile's human-rights record. Some of Pinera's conservative supporters are known to have backed Augusto Pinochet's iron rule decades ago.
Amid this flurry of political activity, a new memorial museum is opening this week in Santiago, the capital, a project led personally by Michelle Bachelet, the current president.
The museum is a tribute to tens of thousands of victims, who like herself, suffered under Pinochet's rule. The Museum, like Yad vaShem, exhibits thousands of photos of the murdered victims.
Al Jazeera's Lucia Newman has this report. esday, January 13, 2010 , 12:54 Mecca time, 09:54 GMT. No other paper in the whole world dared print this piece of news. The UN did not send a Goldstone to investigate these murders.
Roman Pytel, Ph.D. poles4israel
http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/